the
time which is wonderful.
Thanks for any suggestions.
--
Graeme Pietersz
https://pietersz.net/
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:22:08 -0700
Ross Berteig wrote:
> On 10/9/2014 12:18 PM, Graeme Pietersz wrote:
> > >
> > I also need to keep data files unchanged, but as they are not in
> > fossil, they should be OK (Fossil should not delete these as long as
> > I do no
files have "changed", and manually
copy new versions over (there are only a handful).
Does that sound sane?
Graeme
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:50:08 +0200
Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Graeme Pietersz
> wrote:
--- snip ---
> What you're trying to
Thank you Stephan! I have a solution and I have a better understanding
of Fossil as well :)
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 13:59:55 +0200
Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Graeme Pietersz
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the explanation, further questions below if I can s
On 11/03/15 00:45, Ron W wrote:
I'm thinking he wants 2 sets of default settings: The existing one
(which he perceives as being open source oriented) and another set
that are more appropriate for use by software teams within a
"corporate environment".
It would be nice to have, and not ju
On 11/03/15 12:25, Andy Goth wrote:
On 3/11/2015 12:49 AM, Graeme Pietersz wrote:
On 11/03/15 00:45, Ron W wrote:
I'm thinking he wants 2 sets of default settings: The existing one
(which he perceives as being open source oriented) and another set
that are more appropriate for u
On 11/03/15 23:53, Andreas Kupries wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:16 AM, jungle Boogie wrote:
Hi Andreas,
On 11 March 2015 at 10:58, Andreas Kupries wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Richard Boehme wrote:
I would be strongly in favor of presets in Fossil as everyone has outlined
On 12/03/15 02:46, Andy Bradford wrote:
Thus said Andy Goth on Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:56:43 -0500:
anonymous does have some privileges not inherited from nobody (hmncz)
anonymous doesn't have z by default.
No, but nobody does:
https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/68ce0bcf6269988e
Maybe
On 11/03/15 23:21, Andy Goth wrote:
On 3/11/2015 8:58 AM, Graeme Pietersz wrote:
On 11/03/15 12:25, Andy Goth wrote:
All you have to do is take away all of nobody's privileges.
f user capabilities nobody ""
Can also be done with the web interface.
And the same for anonym
On 13/03/15 08:17, jungle Boogie wrote:
Yes, I'm being optimistic about the userbase but we must agree Fossil
to much easier and friendlier to use.
Not always. My reply to this turned out to be rather long and a bit of
rant, so I turned it into a blog post. I hope its not spammy to post a
l
invariably uses Git, and usually Github.
On 13 March 2015 at 08:40, Graeme Pietersz wrote:
On 13/03/15 08:17, jungle Boogie wrote:
Yes, I'm being optimistic about the userbase but we must agree Fossil
to much easier and friendlier to use.
Not always. My reply to this turned out to be ra
[1] http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/million-lines-of-code/
[2]
http://www.quora.com/What-version-control-system-does-microsoft-use-internally
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult
On 3/13/15, Graeme Pietersz wrote:
On 13/03/15 19:50, David Mason wrote:
You have a typo in
On 14/03/15 01:34, Warren Young wrote:
On Mar 13, 2015, at 1:59 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 01:50:19PM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
The thing about most other large projects is that they do not have this
highly-distributed hierarchical contribution model. You’re eith
On 14/03/15 01:45, bch wrote:
On 3/13/15, Graeme Pietersz wrote:
Obviously positing a link to fossil-users is a good way to have mistakes
spotted!
On 13/03/15 22:24, bch wrote:
I am sure that Git has massive advantages for some people, particularly
for large projects with huge numbers of
On 14/03/15 03:01, Warren Young wrote:
On Mar 13, 2015, at 6:40 AM, Graeme Pietersz wrote:
My reply to this turned out to be rather long and a bit of rant, so I turned it
into a blog post.
Some critiques:
1. The post is visually divided into two sections, pro-Fossil and pro-Git, but
the
On 14/03/15 05:20, Warren Young wrote:
On Mar 13, 2015, at 4:22 PM, Graeme Pietersz wrote:
On 14/03/15 03:01, Warren Young wrote:
I believe that once you extract the hosting services from the comparison,
Fossil comes out quite a bit ahead of Git.
Even without hosted services, Git still
On 14/03/15 15:04, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 10:28 AM, j. van den hoff
mailto:veedeeh...@googlemail.com>> wrote:
really a test case for "how does github feel to a newbie". answer:
awkward, to say the very least.
FWIW i have had to use it a dozen times and still fee
On 14/03/15 17:55, jungle Boogie wrote:
On 14 March 2015 at 05:07, Graeme Pietersz wrote:
On 14/03/15 15:04, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 10:28 AM, j. van den hoff
wrote:
really a test case for "how does github feel to a newbie". answer:
awkward, to say the
On 14/03/15 22:03, David Mason wrote:
Thank you Graeme for your thought-provoking post. It seems most
challenges and rebuttals have played out.
Thank you. Yes, I think the discussion is nearly done.
If anyone was mining this thread for ways to improve fossil, I think
they'd see 2 things:
1
On 16/03/15 13:30, Ron W wrote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Graeme Pietersz
> <mailto:gra...@pietersz.net>> wrote:
>
> No one system has all these, but looking at multiple ticket trackers,
> the obvious things to me are:
>
> 1) email notifications, the most
On 16/03/15 13:30, Ron W wrote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Graeme Pietersz <mailto:gra...@pietersz.net>> wrote:
No one system has all these, but looking at multiple ticket
trackers, the obvious things to me are:
1) email notifications, the most important for
On 16/03/15 22:30, Ron W wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Graeme Pietersz <mailto:gra...@pietersz.net>> wrote:
On 16/03/15 13:30, Ron W wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Graeme Pietersz
mailto:gra...@pietersz.net>>
<mailto:gra...@piet
On 17/03/15 00:27, jungle Boogie wrote:
On 16 March 2015 at 11:33, Graeme Pietersz wrote:
So you need an RSS to email script or service that can login to the Fossil
site.
Or permissions for nobody to view the rss feed.
I cannot find a separate RSS permission.
Unless that exists and I
On 17/03/15 01:08, Ron W wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:22 PM, jungle Boogie
mailto:jungleboog...@gmail.com>> wrote:
You're right, it won't be private, so you'll be stuck having your
password in some rss fetch thing. One would have to weigh the risks.
Where I work, we allow - in F
On 17/03/15 06:20, Warren Young wrote:
On Mar 16, 2015, at 11:15 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
The timeline graph is drawn using JS. Without JS you do not get the
very nice timeline graph. I don't see any reasonable way around that.
Hi, it’s the resident pro web app developer checking in again.
You could just use the version in the repos. It will not be the latest
version, but will work perfectly well. This is probably what you would
do with any other VCS, so it should not be a problem (or any other
software, for that matter).
There is an Ubuntu PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~beowulfof
s that Stephan mentioned. I almost never have clutter-free
> source trees, and addremove is just too all-inclusive for that work flow.
>
I use addremove all the time. I works well as long as I do wish I could
undo easily when I make mistakes with it. --dry-run h
directories in any
version. Not sure if that helps.
I would be very grateful for any help.
Graeme
--
Graeme Pietersz
http://moneyterms.co.uk/
http://pietersz.net/
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
--
Graeme Pietersz
http://moneyterms.co.uk/
http://pietersz.net/
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
t
> seamless support. If you work back and forth between Windows and Unix
> then you probably just don't use symlinks, so it won't be a problem
> for you!
>
> ../Dave
>
>
> ___
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
--
Graeme Pietersz
http://moneyterms.co.uk/
http://pietersz.net/
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
30 matches
Mail list logo
