On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 20:36 +0100, Thomas wrote:
> On 2018-06-14 17:47, Roy Keene wrote:
> > If it's any conideration, if it's not a mailing list or something
> > else
> > pushed to me, I'll never see it. A fossil users' forum will never
> > get
> > checked (pulled) by me since I am just too laz
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 06:05:33PM -0600, Scott Robison wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
>
> > > git branch -D name
> >
> > Eh, filesystems let you delete files. Unlike most filesystems, git lets
> > you restore your deleted branches (yes, provided you don't gc the r
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 02:02:39PM -0400, Ron W wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:18 AM, wrote:
>
> > Can Fossil offer 2 solutions? SQLite based and PostgreSQL(insert big RDB
> > here)?
> >
>
> I think that the only way this will happen would be to fork Fossil into a
> new project. This would b
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 05:29:41PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
> Okay, more git bashing...
Yeah. It's too easy _not_ to do.
Git is just another steaming Linux-centric pile that makes me so thankful
there are people like Dr. Hipp and you and all the fossil guys.
Consider the following points:
1)
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:08:05AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> On 9/11/2013 08:59, John Long wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:49:14AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> >>Only 7 months left of MS support: http://goo.gl/dtpQj4
> >
> >So what?
>
> After the
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:49:14AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> On 9/11/2013 08:36, Michai Ramakers wrote:
> >For my information: is WinXP still an 'officially supported' platform?
> >I realise it's a bit old, but I happen to use fossil on that platform,
> >occasionally.
There are plenty of people
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 06:40:19PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:26 PM, John Long wrote:
>
> > ...that problem is solved by using SHA1. The other issue, which is
> > specific to
> > specific situations, is whether the hash alone is sufficien
Stephan, Andy,
> Put briefly: when you tell fossil to give you the contents of file
> abcdef, it may internally go through several versions of that file on
> its way to generating the one you requested, applying deltas as it goes.
> The end result is that the content is logically immutable, an
Sorry for the delay. I've been swamped with work.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 02:30:10PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:58 PM, John Long wrote:
> > Digital signing means "I certify that I wrote this." This thing itself, and
> > not something
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 09:28:00PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:03 PM, John Long wrote:
> > My understanding is you already compute checksums on commits.
>
>
> At a lot of places. "Blob content" is referenced by its content SHA1, so
>
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:43:36PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:39 PM, John Long wrote:
>
> > If you're working on flagging PGP commits then it would be really nice to
> > say PGP in red if the signature doesn't verify or green if it doe
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:32:21PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:07 PM, John Long wrote:
>
> > I need to go back in the archives and see where I can find an example of
> > this but in the meantime to ask the obvious, is fossil verifying the
> > s
I need to go back in the archives and see where I can find an example of
this but in the meantime to ask the obvious, is fossil verifying the
signatures as part of the commit process or does fossil simply carry the
data so the signature can be verified manually?
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:00:41PM
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 03:11:34PM +0800, Michael Richter wrote:
> On 15 August 2013 21:23, John Long wrote:
>
> > Hi, is it possible to ignore UNIX executables? I want to do an addr on a
> > directory tree but I don't know how to tell fossil not to track the
> > bi
much
requested capability. But then again I do about 1% of my development on UNIX
and 99% elsewhere so a lot of things in UNIX seem strange to me and I
probably miss the point a lot.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:37:22AM -0400, Ron Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:14 AM, John Lon
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:24:57AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:11 AM, John Long wrote:
>
> >
> > Ok so would you mind explaining how you deal with this issue? Are you
> > manually adding stuff, or just adding .c and .h files, or ??
> >
&g
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:58:52AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
>
> >
> > I guess Richard works mostly on Windows and can ignore *.exe ;-)
> >>
> >
> > IIRC (maybe wrong) he works more on Mac.
> >
> >
> I work on Linux. Linux has been my prima
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 03:17:32PM +0100, David Given wrote:
> John Long wrote:
> [...]
> > That's what I have been doing. But it seems very wrong to have to play games
> > with this.
>
> If you know the names of the binaries in advance, it should be possible
> to
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 03:35:08PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:23 PM, John Long wrote:
>
> > Hi, is it possible to ignore UNIX executables? I want to do an addr on a
> > directory tree but I don't know how to tell fossil not to track the
>
Hi, is it possible to ignore UNIX executables? I want to do an addr on a
directory tree but I don't know how to tell fossil not to track the binaries
since they have no naming pattern. Until now I've been living with it but it
is very annoying and time for me to ask. Help!
Sorry if this appears tw
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:31:18PM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:22 PM, John Long wrote:
>
> > I just finished deleting a few dozen repos since I moved a bunch of source
> > code to another machine and fossil refused to like it. After that I found a
>
I just finished deleting a few dozen repos since I moved a bunch of source
code to another machine and fossil refused to like it. After that I found a
discussion on the mailing lists about test-move-repository. Not a big deal
since this was all test stuff but I would like to know what the official
22 matches
Mail list logo
