Hey folks.
So far, most of my Fossil use has been on projects I own almost
exclusively. However, I'm about to start working on projects with a
community, and while I'm going to push Fossil adoption hard, I may get
some pushback from Git users. Is it possible to use Fossil in a workflow
with p
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Nolan Darilek wrote:
> some pushback from Git users. Is it possible to use Fossil in a workflow
> with people who would rather use Git/Github?
Richard wrote a nice summary of that on Oct 16th which i'll paste in here:
---
Fossil does not currently sup
Thanks, but that's not really what I asked.
I totally get Fossil's development model, have used it for over a year
and think that it'd be a great fit for this particular community. I also
read this message when it was originally posted. But I may be working
with people who would rather submit
Hi Nolan, Stephan,
I think that this is doable for a restricted subclass of usage scenarios
(these conforming workflow style cited by Stephan above + bunch of
other restrictions).
We can benefit the fantastic opportunity of sqlite as fossil artifacts
container - I think that it is possible
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Alek Paunov wrote:
> As Fossil API, for the proof of the concept, the server can use the JSON
> API, Stephan ?
>
>
The biggest catch there is binary data, since JSON has no native way of
handing it. However, my current thinking on binary data is this...
from JSON
On 04.11.2011 21:01, Stephan Beal wrote:
The biggest catch there is binary data, since JSON has no native way of
handing it. However, my current thinking on binary data is this...
from JSON we serve URL paths which, which called by an HTTP client, will
return the raw content (binary or not) for
Apologies in advance if this makes no sense. I've only done a tiny bit with git
and that was some time ago.
What if you have a single directory that both version control systems use? You
pull from git, commit to Fossil, do your changes and commit to Fossil, and then
push your changes to git. Wh
On 11/4/2011 11:48 AM, Alek Paunov wrote:
Hi Nolan, Stephan,
I think that this is doable for a restricted subclass of usage scenarios (these
conforming workflow style cited by Stephan above + bunch of other restrictions).
We can benefit the fantastic opportunity of sqlite as fossil artifacts
co
On 04.11.2011 22:32, Andreas Kupries wrote:
Does hg have something git's rebase and other history rewriting
operations ?
Yes - hg supports all of them and more (via various bundled [1] and
endless count of community extensions), but as you know, history
rewriting kills any repo/repo synchroni
Just a heads-up:
I did a quick test, and this didn't seem to work:
* Created a new Fossil repository
* Opened it into ./fossil, added README.txt with contents "foo".
* Changed to parent directory, created Git repository in ./git
* Imported Fossil repo and switched to trunk branch
* Modified READ
On 10/11/2011, at 2:30 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> I tried to do something similar, using a git tag to keep track of where I was
> up to
> for the incremental import.
>
> It mostly works, except the timeline shows each import as disconnected from
> the previous import. See attached.
>
> For the
On 10/11/2011, at 2:50 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:On 10/11/2011, at 2:30 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:I tried to do something similar, using a git tag to keep track of where I was up tofor the incremental import.It mostly works, except the timeline shows each import as disconnected fromthe previous import.
No comments on this?It works for me. Shall I commit this fix, or are there potential issues with it?On 10/11/2011, at 3:17 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:On 10/11/2011, at 2:50 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:On 10/11/2011, at 2:30 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:I tried to do something similar, using a git tag to keep t
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> No comments on this?
>
> It works for me. Shall I commit this fix, or are there potential issues
> with it?
>
I think go ahead and commit.
>
> On 10/11/2011, at 3:17 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
>
> On 10/11/2011, at 2:50 PM, Steve Bennett wro
On 14/11/2011, at 9:55 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> No comments on this?
>
> It works for me. Shall I commit this fix, or are there potential issues with
> it?
>
> I think go ahead and commit.
FYI, what I committed this doesn't work p
15 matches
Mail list logo
