in another word it is not possible to link staticly...
For little project, no hardware acceleration devices does not hurt.
But, for projects that need secure connections with numerous users, it will be
crucial.
Let imagine accountants that need speed secure connections ...
Why don't fossil create
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:02 PM, K. Fossil user <
ticketpersonnal-fos...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Why don't fossil create a lite version that could be static and the full
> one which will forbid the static option ?
> Isn't that a good idea ?
>
That's like asking, "why not have a fossil which has no ne
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:02:59PM +, K. Fossil user wrote:
> in another word it is not possible to link staticly...
> For little project, no hardware acceleration devices does not hurt.
> But, for projects that need secure connections with numerous users, it will
> be crucial.
> Let imagine a
1/ RedHat is a company that needs to earn money.
If static compiling is used then few people may need to buy their products.
If you read what is written, it is not said IMPOSSIBLE.
It is said DISCOURAGED, which is TOTALLY not the same.
As I said, it should be possible to dynamically linking, but I
>
>Why don't fossil create a lite version that could be static and the full one
>which
>will forbid the static option ?
>Isn't that a good idea ?
>That's like asking, "why not have a fossil which has no networking support?"
>and the
>answer is, "because it would be nearly useless." On modern Lin
suggest a lite release of fossil so --static could
be used
>
>Why don't fossil create a lite version that could be static and the full one
>which
>will forbid the static option ?
>Isn't that a good idea ?
>That's like asking, "why not have a fossil which has n
s in the from field. I'm used to fossil-users@ being in the
from address of mailing list emails.
>
> De : K
> À : ticketpersonnal-fos...@yahoo.fr
> Envoyé le : Vendredi 1 février 2013 0h45
> Objet : Re: [fossil-users] I suggest a lite release of fossil so --static
> coul
On 1/31/2013 2:02 PM, K. Fossil user wrote:
in another word it is not possible to link staticly...
For little project, no hardware acceleration devices does not hurt.
But, for projects that need secure connections with numerous users, it
will be crucial.
Let imagine accountants that need speed
>
> I'm not sure if I understand what's being said, but if I do, I would
> disagree that Fossil sans networking support would be "nearly useless".
>
> I use Fossil locally exclusively. I may be in the minority. I do not know.
>
"Nearly" meaning essentially "for everyone who uses it with remote rep
on Feb 01, 2013, Stephan Beal wrote:
>
>
>I'm not sure if I understand what's being said, but if I do, I would disagree
>that
>Fossil sans networking support would be "nearly useless".
>
>
>
>
>I use Fossil locally exclusively. I may be in the minority. I do not know.
>
>"Nearly" meaning essent
10 matches
Mail list logo