That is close to what i do for initial prototypes - develop in the chrome
dev tools console, injecting the code into the page, but at some point it
has to get integrated.
(sent from a mobile device, possibly from bed - please excuse brevity,
typos, and top-posting)
- stephan beal
http://wander
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Stephan Beal
wrote:
> Testing/tweaking JS code generated from C code, requiring a recompile and
> server process restart after each change, gets really tedious really
> quickly, so i'd like to keep the implementation as trivial as possible ;).
>
Maybe could have
Thus said Scott Robison on Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:04:29 -0600:
> Sorry for opening this huge can of worms! :)
Haha, don't sweat it. I've actually wished for some improvements to the
permission checkbox page for a while. I've always found it annoying that
the letters are not displayed when selectin
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Scott Robison
wrote:
> On Sep 30, 2014 9:57 AM, "Stephan Beal" wrote:
> > i didn't even consider the font width - excellent point.
>
> {snipped}
>
> Sorry for opening this huge can of worms! :)
>
i lay the blame squarely on Andy B. for that one ;). i'm really pl
On Sep 30, 2014 9:57 AM, "Stephan Beal" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Andy Bradford
wrote:
>>
>> I actually did try to update it myself last night but had alignment
>> issues due to the font on the (s) letter not being a fixed font.
>
>
> i didn't even consider the font width -
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Andy Bradford
wrote:
> I actually did try to update it myself last night but had alignment
> issues due to the font on the (s) letter not being a fixed font.
>
i didn't even consider the font width - excellent point.
> > http://fossil.wanderinghorse.net/tm
Thus said Stephan Beal on Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:32:06 +0200:
> Here's a screenshot showing a partial implementation, with a couple
> different placement options. i'm not happy with any of them :/.
I actually did try to update it myself last night but had alignment
issues due to the font on
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> Or perhaps instead each Capability should have it's letter next to it?
>>
>> (s) Setup(u) Reader (r) Read Ticket
>> (a) Admin(v) Developer(n) New Tickets
>> (d) Delete (g) Clone(c) Append To Ticket
>> (
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Andy Bradford
wrote:
>
> Would it be better to just add each new capability letter to the end of
> the current string?
>
Seems i spoke to soon on the option of underlining/marking the most
recently selected letter: the sorting (ironically enough) gets in the way
The first impl used whatever order the checkboxes are in, but that was even
less readable. One simple solution, i think, would be to keep the sorting
but underline the most recently selected letter. Will try that when i get
home.
- stephan
Sent from a mobile device, possibly from bed. Please e
Thus said "Joe Mistachkin" on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 14:43:15 -0700:
> Works great. I made a couple style tweaks, including adding some CSS
> and moving the new elements out one level. I'm not sure if my CSS is
> the best choice, please feel free to enhance the styling.
Looks fine here.
I sometime
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Scott Robison
wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2014 12:49 AM, "Stephan Beal" wrote:
> >
> > Sidenote: i'm curious why most people prefer postscript addition, when
> prefix is "never slower and sometimes faster." (Not that it matters one
> iota for a case like this, it just se
Scott Robison wrote:
> --===0702352335==
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044286d854da5a05042007d5
>
> --f46d044286d854da5a05042007d5
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On Sep 28, 2014 12:49 AM, "Stephan Beal" wrote:
>>
>> Sidenote: i'm curious why most pe
On Sep 28, 2014 12:49 AM, "Stephan Beal" wrote:
>
> Sidenote: i'm curious why most people prefer postscript addition, when
prefix is "never slower and sometimes faster." (Not that it matters one
iota for a case like this, it just seems to be very deeply embedded in most
people i know.)
I think mo
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> In JS there are only 2 scopes: global and local function scope, so that
> (var e) behaves as if it's declared outside of the for loop, whether or not
> it really is. Kinda silly, i know.
>
Had to go clarify that for my own sake:
http://dail
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Joe Mistachkin
wrote:
> Works great. I made a couple style tweaks, including adding some CSS and
> moving the new elements out one level. I'm not sure if my CSS is the best
> choice, please feel free to enhance the styling.
>
Looks good to me, but bit of trivi
Stephan Beal wrote:
>
> Please try this out:
>
> http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?r=inherit-priv-mark-sub
>
Works great. I made a couple style tweaks, including adding some CSS and
moving the new elements out one level. I'm not sure if my CSS is the best
choice, please feel free
17 matches
Mail list logo
