Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-29 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > My understanding is that the concern raised was about copying (i.e. > shell command cp, or maybe scp), not syncing. > It would only be copied if someone copies their checkout db file, which would be a highly unusual thing to do. Of course, wh

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-29 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 01:52:49PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 12:56 PM, BohwaZ wrote: > > > provides that, but it's ok as long as it's not turned on by default and > > we can clear the history, like before copying a repository file to > > publish it online. > > > > It's

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-15 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 12:56 PM, BohwaZ wrote: > provides that, but it's ok as long as it's not turned on by default and > we can clear the history, like before copying a repository file to > publish it online. > It's stored in the checkout db, so it's _never_ synced. The '-c' flag clears the h

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-15 Thread BohwaZ
Le Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:58:56 +0200, Stephan Beal a écrit : > If you don't find the idea offensive/abusive, you needn't say > anything. If you do, please voice your concerns. If there is > sufficient outcry i'll drop that branch instead of integrating it. If > we do decide to add it, i will add a

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-12 Thread Chad Perrin
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:14:01AM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:58 PM, B Harder wrote: > > > fossil set tracker [on|off] ? > > > IIRC "Trac" was Fossil's predecessor for ticket tracking, and "tracker" > always implies tickets to me (as a by-day/by-night developer). > >

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread Kees Nuyt
[Default] On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:32:10 +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: > >> I wouldn't be interested in logging query-class commands, like >> fossil ls, fossil status, fossil timeline >> > >Do you mean the SQL code itself? No, I now realize "query" is a confusing word. I mean the class of commands

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread B Harder
fossil set tracker [on|off] ? On Sep 11, 2013 2:32 PM, "Stephan Beal" wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Kees Nuyt wrote: > >> I wouldn't mind logging the arguments as well, especially for commands >> that modify the repository or a stash. >> > > i considered it, but the code overhead ju

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread Ron Wilson
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Kees Nuyt wrote: > [Default] On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:32:10 +0200, Stephan Beal > wrote: > >> usage -> commandtrace or commandhistory or cmdtrace or cmdhistory > > > > i think 3 of those might mess up the column alignment in 'help' ;). > > Yeah, I'm happy with 'cmd

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread Ron Wilson
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:58 PM, B Harder wrote: > fossil set tracker [on|off] ? > Or 'fossil set cmdhist [on|off]' Good idea. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fos

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread Stephan Beal
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Ron Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:58 PM, B Harder wrote: > >> fossil set tracker [on|off] ? >> > Or 'fossil set cmdhist [on|off]' > i like cmdhist but my fingers don't like typing it :/. cmdhist. Just feels awkward to type. Kind of like the word "aw

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:58 PM, B Harder wrote: > fossil set tracker [on|off] ? > IIRC "Trac" was Fossil's predecessor for ticket tracking, and "tracker" always implies tickets to me (as a by-day/by-night developer). How about... fossil set nsa-mode on|off ;) That reminds me (for some reaso

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Kees Nuyt wrote: > I mean the class of commands that doesn't change anything to a > repository or a checkout is not interesting for logging. > That's a very good point - didn't think of that. We could also do this at the db level - log them all but then create v

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Kees Nuyt wrote: > I wouldn't mind logging the arguments as well, especially for commands > that modify the repository or a stash. > i considered it, but the code overhead just wasn't worth it at that time of night. One of these days i'll miss having that, add i

[fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread Stephan Beal
Hi, all, Once 1.27 officially goes out the door, i plan on pulling the new 'usage' command into the trunk (for 1.28). My question to you is: is there anyone who finds the idea of fossil recording which commands (not their arguments) and the times of their usage in the local checkout database offen

Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command

2013-09-11 Thread Kees Nuyt
[Default] On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:58:56 +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: >Hi, all, > >Once 1.27 officially goes out the door, i plan on pulling the new 'usage' >command into the trunk (for 1.28). My question to you is: is there anyone >who finds the idea of fossil recording which commands (not their arg