[fossil-users] The command "update --nochange" actually changes _FOSSIL_

Hi All, Just something I noticed that seems un-intuitive and makes calling the binary from something like PHP more difficult. The "--nochange" option is documented as "do not perform changes but show what would be done" so it really shouldn't change _FOSSIL_. If you don't have write permission to

Re: [fossil-users] The command "update --nochange" actually changes _FOSSIL_

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Steve Waggoner wrote: > Hi All, > > Just something I noticed that seems un-intuitive and makes calling the > binary from something like PHP more difficult. The "--nochange" option is > documented as "do not perform changes but show what would be done" so it > reall