Thus said Warren Young on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 08:45:33 -0600:
> It's basically a dead protocol these days. There is no reason Fossil
> should implement it. Wrappers like tsocks are indeed the right way to
> use SOCKS in 2015.
I don't think it's exactly dead yet. I still find it quite convenient t
On Oct 20, 2015, at 5:21 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/quickstart.wiki#proxy
SOCKS is a completely different protocol from HTTP. It was a common way to
allow a privately-addressed LAN access the Internet through a border gateway
back in the day
I actually found that page, but it speaks only of http proxies. Not
socks proxies.
At the moment I solved using tsocks[1].
[1] http://tsocks.sourceforge.net
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 10/20/15, Paolo Bolzoni wrote:
>> Dear list,
>>
>> I'd like to use fossil in a
On 10/20/15, Paolo Bolzoni wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I'd like to use fossil in a strangely configurated headless machine.
> In that machine to connected to the internet I need to use a socks
> proxy.
>
> I checked the fossil manual, but I could not find anything about it.
> It is possible to clone a
Dear list,
I'd like to use fossil in a strangely configurated headless machine.
In that machine to connected to the internet I need to use a socks
proxy.
I checked the fossil manual, but I could not find anything about it.
It is possible to clone and sync via socks proxies?
I'll be happy to read
5 matches
Mail list logo