> fo-install is using the addgroup command. This one is specific to Debian
> IIRC. The one which seems common to most distro is groupadd. So the
> install fails on CentOS due to that.
Actually it doesn't, but it was doing some checking in a way that was
noisy. I switched to a less verbose way.
>
Bruno Cornec said on Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:50:21PM +0100:
> Then I have issues with the postgresql conf, which is normal as I didn't
> finished that part. Will work on that just now.
I'm working in an empty chroot to test the fossology install, so I have
no previous postgresql install setup. H
Hello,
Matt Taggart said on Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:17:08AM -0800:
> Hmm, must be a race condition, I'll see if I can add something to prevent
> that.
Thanks.
I'm now testing the installation of my packages, and find other small
issues.
fo-install is using the addgroup command. This one is sp
> In my build travel, I also found what seems to be a bug in the building
> process of Fossology:
>
> Normal call for fedora packages (that I mimic on centos) is:
> make %{?_smp_mflags} SYSCONFDIR=%{_sysconfdir}
>
> However, using SMP features leaded to a build error:
> Regenerating variables lis
Bruno Cornec said on Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:55:34AM +0100:
> So I've produced preliminary *non working* packages that I'll now test
> to see the install deps. Once the process is reliable (I pass my weekend
> adding the chroot feature to project-builder in order to support that)
> I'll give you a
Channing Benson said on Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 02:42:40PM -0500:
> Experience of installing packages required for FOSSology on a RHEL5.3
> x86 system that was installed with just development and default
> packages.
I want to report my findings using that report, and building in a cenot
4 & 5 chroot
6 matches
Mail list logo
