Re: [FOSSology] Scheduler entering a loop

2009-05-28 Thread Laser, Mary
Hello Bennis, I don't see any indication that the scheduler is stuck in a loop. The "WARNING" messages below are simply informational. What do the subsequent messages look like? Mary From: Abraham Bennis [mailto:abrahamben...@johndeere.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 26

Re: [FOSSology] RPM Spec Recommendations

2009-05-28 Thread Matt Taggart
> Would it be a good idea reduce the overall build complexity by > splitting each agent into its own install package? For example, > libextractor is only used by the pkgmetagetta module, which most > people probably don't care about anyway. The Debian packaging is already designed with this

Re: [FOSSology] RPM Spec Recommendations

2009-05-28 Thread Matt Taggart
> After some thought, I think this would be a GREAT case study to > demonstrate why Linux needs to have certain standards in place that are > COMMON across all distributions.The efforts that were spent on getting > FOSSology running on another distribution of Linux (from Debian to Redhat >

Re: [FOSSology] RPM Spec Recommendations

2009-05-28 Thread Matt Taggart
> Without looking too closely at the fossology build setup, I imagine > this would be pretty easy to do inside the RPM itself. We can create > sub-packages for the various modules, and dynamically add the > buildrequires on ie. libextractor only when building a module where > it's needed.

Re: [FOSSology] RPM Spec Recommendations

2009-05-28 Thread Jeff Sheltren
On May 28, 2009, at 8:01 AM, Bob Gobeille wrote: > > On May 27, 2009, at 10:55 PM, Jeff Sheltren wrote: > >> On May 15, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Jeff Sheltren wrote: >> >> The only build requirement that I can see which isn't in EL5 base or >> in EPEL is libextractor-devel. I rebuilt a fedora libextract

Re: [FOSSology] RPM Spec Recommendations

2009-05-28 Thread Bob Gobeille
Hi George, This is why the Linux Standard Base (LSB) was created: http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/lsb The biggest problem we have is with different ways to do packaging (apt, rpm, yum) and the fast and distributed release cycle across the distros. Bob On May 28, 20

Re: [FOSSology] RPM Spec Recommendations

2009-05-28 Thread george . pace
Bob (and everyone else on the list) I wanted to take this opportunity and thank the team for making such great strides getting FOSSology to the point of an RPM install. I am looking for to the official release After some thought, I think this would be a GREAT case study to demonstrate w

Re: [FOSSology] RPM Spec Recommendations

2009-05-28 Thread Bob Gobeille
On May 27, 2009, at 10:55 PM, Jeff Sheltren wrote: > On May 15, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Jeff Sheltren wrote: > > The only build requirement that I can see which isn't in EL5 base or > in EPEL is libextractor-devel. I rebuilt a fedora libextractor > package in order to get the fossology build working -