John Vandenberg wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru wrote:
I have no idea of the en.ws situation, nor do I want to have any idea, but
I would like to remark that leaving such things to the community decision
is a good idea only if the community
Birgitte SB wrote:
Sorry but there is no reason to have a RFC on Meta for anything remotely like
this situation. And I would say that if were regarding any wiki (I am sure I
have said that for similar situations on other wikis in the past). The wikis
are autonomous on these issues. If
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dirk hun...@iis.sinica.edu.tw
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:58:07 +0800
Subject: A question about Attribution survey and licensing next steps
To: foundation-l-ow...@lists.wikimedia.org
What is your purpose on this statistics? Can you explain it for me? I
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
2009/3/11 geni geni...@gmail.com:
Importing wikipedia content would be an absolute pain
Why? The language doesn't require you to include a full list of
authors. Only if you want your copy to be a link-creditable copy,
Resending Sue Gardner's report for January, for the list archive.
I really like to be able to link to it. (Sue, you have a habit of
starting paragraphs with From and this bug is still there.)
--
Lars Aronsson (l...@aronsson.se)
Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se
--
I have refrained from commenting in the interests of letting this play out but
find myself in disagreement with our worthy colleague from Wikisource. The
locus of this complaint, as I see it, is that he was unfairly removed from his
position. I see no merit in his claims for the following
That people on this list can't necessarily interfere or overturn the
de-adminship is a point separate from whether or not it can be discussed
here. I'm not aware of any hard rules limiting topics of discussion to those
issues which can readily be addressed by participants of this forum.
Bringing
--- On Thu, 3/12/09, Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net wrote:
From: Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Pissed off at en:Wikisource
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Thursday, March 12, 2009, 3:03 AM
Birgitte SB wrote:
Hi all,
Since January there has been a proposal at Meta to facilitate image
restoration. Support has been nearly unanimous.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Restoration.wikimedia.org
To keep the discussion centralized, please post comments or questions to the
proposal talk page.
Many thanks to
Posting during breaks is a bad idea. I meant kill as in we should stop
discussing this as there is no effective remedy, no mod kill intended.
From: Nathan nawr...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Thursday,
Biographies of living people bring up legal issues, this matter does not.
From: Delirium delir...@hackish.org
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 5:05:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Pissed
Hi everyone,
I've appointed two new volunteers into the role of email system team leader
(commonly known as OTRS admin), Daniel Bryant and Mark Wesbeeg.
Daniel is a longtime OTRS agent since March of 2007, an administrator on
en.wikipedia, and a bureaucrat on meta. His unified account name is
Should someone handle this?
http://www.blackwikipedia.org/
BlackWikipedia is a nonprofit private organization to support WMF, the
Foundation working to maintain and develop the free online
encyclopedia, Wikipedia. Wikipedia is constantly looking for donors as
you can see in the banner top of
13 matches
Mail list logo
