Here's a link to a useful post by Member of European Parliament detailing
the schedule for ACTA in the next months:
http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/ow1v5/acta_note_from_marietje_schaake_member_of_the/
Regards,
--
Orionist
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Kim Bruning
Apparently the ambassador of the Netherlands did not get permission in time
to sign the agreement. It seems nobody really knows yet why that was, but
it is expected that the signature will follow. Also the signature of Spain,
Slovenia and Cyprus seems to be missing yet. Source:
Hi all,
the Wikimedia Foundation's Global Development department has recently
published a midyear report on its activities, regarding the 2011-12
annual plan. You can find it on Meta:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WMF_Global_Development_Midyear_report_2011-12
--
Tilman Bayer
Movement
I opened a RFC request on Meta,
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/POV_in_Chechen_Wikipedia
In my view, this is a situation similar to the one in Acehnese Wikipedia,
which we had recently - when a group of users basically hijack a WMF
project and start to promote goals
Hoi,
Thanks for bringing this up, Yaroslav. If it turns out to be a really
solid claim, we would need someone neutral with language competence to
figure out what is going on there... Any ideas? I have a retired
professor in mind who speaks the language fairly well (Johanna Nichols
from UC
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:58:02 +0100, Thomas Goldammer
tho...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hoi,
Thanks for bringing this up, Yaroslav. If it turns out to be a really
solid claim, we would need someone neutral with language competence to
figure out what is going on there... Any ideas? I have a retired
On 27 January 2012 06:38, Philippe Beaudette phili...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi everyone -
Sue has asked me to create a mailing list to discuss advocacy and
Wikimedia's position in it for the future. Although I don't yet have the
list created, I wanted to put out a call for moderators. If
Hm, I think closing it is no option we should really consider. Maybe
we must try to share apart those who have understood the principles
and abide by them and those who don't and - well - remove sysop rights
of the latter group and encourage the first group to have the wiki
cleaned up and to
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:23:22 +0100, Thomas Goldammer
tho...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hm, I think closing it is no option we should really consider. Maybe
we must try to share apart those who have understood the principles
and abide by them and those who don't and - well - remove sysop rights
of
I haven't read the RFC carefully, but since it is opened, so I informed
Sasan700 and Dagger on their talk page. Also emailed Sasan700.
Best regards,
Benjamin Chen / User:Bencmq
On Friday, January 27, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:23:22 +0100, Thomas
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:14:40 +0800, Benjamin Chen cnchenmi...@gmail.com
wrote:
I haven't read the RFC carefully, but since it is opened, so I informed
Sasan700 and Dagger on their talk page. Also emailed Sasan700.
Best regards,
Benjamin Chen / User:Bencmq
Great, thanks, Benjamin.
As for the article on Ramzan Kadyrov, I just checked and the only editor was
Дагиров Умар plus a bot (Luckas-bot)
Best regards,
Benjamin Chen / User:Bencmq
On Friday, January 27, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:23:22 +0100, Thomas Goldammer
Interesting facts about size, growing and accelerating.
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/en/geoffrey_west_the_surprising_math_of_cities_and_corporations.html
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
Hi all,
The WMF Board of Trustees is planning our winter meeting for next
weekend. The draft agenda is posted here for comment:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Board_Meetings/February_3-4,_2012
This is a very full agenda, focusing on three main topics: the WMF
annual planning process
Hi Phoebe, Often the most interesting thing about an agenda is what it
omits. So the first board meeting after the SOPA blackout is not going to
discuss blackouts, SOPA and lobbying?
WereSpielChequers
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:22:56 -0800
From: phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 5:41 PM, WereSpielChequers
werespielchequ...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Phoebe, Often the most interesting thing about an agenda is what it
omits. So the first board meeting after the SOPA blackout is not going to
discuss blackouts, SOPA and lobbying?
I am assuming Legal will
Phoebe,
On this agenda, could you give more detail about the topic Paid editing
discussion? There is a current discussion on EN at the Village Pump regarding,
among other things, PR personnel who edit on Wikipedia in ways that might
violate NPOV and COI policy. It would be good to know if the
Phoebe, this meeting is not the one to approve or not the Recomendations
from Sue, right? I always imagined that would be AFTER the meeting in Paris.
_
*Béria Lima*
http://wikimedia.pt/(351) 925 171 484
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
livre acesso ao
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Kat Walsh k...@mindspillage.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 5:41 PM, WereSpielChequers
werespielchequ...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Phoebe, Often the most interesting thing about an agenda is what it
omits. So the first board meeting after the SOPA blackout is not
Hello Kim,
Geoff asked me to prepare the following summaries of ACTA and OPEN with
the understanding that it only represents some preliminary research to
support the ongoing community discussion. You can find the research here:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Legal/ACTA
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net wrote:
..
One does well to follow Michael Geist's blogs on this
[http://www.michaelgeist.ca/ here]. He has been on top of this issue since
it started, and provides links to developments on his left sidebar.
ACTA is probably
I found two sentences unclear, but didn't know how to fix them; see
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Legal/ACTA
--
[[:en:User:Slashme|David Richfield]]
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
If I understand correctly, Obama has issued an executive order
approving ACTA, but that executive order is suppressed as a state
secret. And the administration hasnt given it a number because there
are no gaps in the numbering of Obama's EO list..?
As I understand it's rather called an
23 matches
Mail list logo
