Awesome!
On Saturday, May 14, 2011, Tim Starling wrote:
> Email notification for user talk page changes is now enabled on all wikis.
>
> The issue came up at the MediaWiki developer meeting here in Berlin. A
> few ops people were sitting together, we couldn't think of any reason
> why it wasn't e
>social communities
I think most would argue that porn is inherently anti-social. I don't see a
lot of social communities made up of just one person (probably half of IRC).
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:55, Nathan wrote:
> Pretty neat; maybe porn isn't on the map because there is a continent
> de
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 22:29, Utkarshraj Atmaram wrote:
> Remember, Sam Vaknin is a Ph.D., so he cannot be wrong.
Probably has a Bachelor in Science, too.
~A
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wik
Good?
"Though the Wikipedia has more than 12 million registered users, its
inner core consists of roughly 1,700 administrators who possess the
ability to reject edits, lock down pages from further editing, and
deem entire entries unworthy. But the real power lies in the
Wikipedian equivalent of th
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 20:05, Jay Walsh wrote:
> Wikipedia is written by hundreds of thousands of volunteers from around the
> world, and that won't change with this project. The Wikipedia Public Policy
> Initiative will recruit Wikipedia volunteers to work with public policy
> professors and
Amusing, perhaps, but it would really serve no purpose other than to
be vindictive and pointed (everyone know Wikimedia is smarter than
Fox). Besides, it'd be a copyvio.
~A
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 19:39, stevertigo wrote:
> David Gerard wrote:
>> http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/05/10/por
I recognize that the issue is more about the point and process of the
whole thing, and that it's not just Wales who deleted images, but I
think some perspective is useful.
Jimbo deleted 71 images.
That doesn't call for outright rage.
~A
___
foundation
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-May/thread.html
Everything is archived.
~Amory
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
It still works, it's just harder. And I'm totally with you on the
second point. Jimmy got a needed process started. Could he have
started it a different, less dramatic way? Probably. Would that have
been better? Probably. As effective? Probably not. If you're
looking to masturbate, Commons
This is nuts. Literally, nothing has changed. Stuff on Wikimedia
sites needs to be either educational or aimed at furthering the goals
of the project and the foundation. We don't host articles about my
her breasts or his penis, and we don't need to host images of them
either. Arguing otherwise
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 19:07, K. Peachey wrote:
> The more time you spend trying to shutdown the pages/groups/whatever
> else, the more it encourages users to do it, So just pay no attention
> to them.
We have an article on that! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
~A
___
11 matches
Mail list logo