A hoax, and I have out in a request for speedy removal, as no such
chapter have send in an application to ChapCom.
Anders
김우진 skrev:
> According to http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1636517, This page
> insists that Wikimedia Korea has been approved in Sep 12 2009 by Wikimedia
> F
A proposal from me that I have entered on
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Improving_Foundation-l
Wikiinfrastructure to support and ease moderation
-All users on foundation-l must have an User account on Meta, with
automatic mailsignal when discussion page is changed
-Document wanted behavior rule
Anthony skrev:
> This is especially true if the main person complaining about the discussion
> has only been here for a month.
>
Just for the record as I will not pursue this issue any more.
I have used e-mails daily since 1984 (actually then introducing the
first mailsystem into a major Swedi
s is after all a
> platform for discussion, not for people to come and find out how I
> feel about things.
>
> Mark
>
> skype: node.ue
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Jussi-Ville
> Heiskanen wrote:
>
>> Thomas Dalton wrote:
>>
>&
I have only been on this list for a month, but I am confused over what I
read. There are over 700 subscribers, but two, Anthony and Thoams Dalton
is allowed, to generate more then a third of all entries and often just
these two are driving a whole thread discussion. On Wikipedia we all
work har
When I analyze different language version I have developed a small model
dividing up the versions into being in one out of three development phases
-The buildup phase where mostly just more articles are added. Most of
the bigger versions have left this phase but many newer one are still in
this.
Some complementing data on users from Swedish Wikipedia,
-Youngsters 15-22- high turnover & somewhat decreasing volume - do
vandal fighting, write of computer games, music, film, sport etc (and
these areas are worthy of respect too)
-Middle aged 22-50
--An increasing number of low volume contr
I also like this approach
*On most informal level - a Working Group, carefully organized under a
"Working Group Organizer" who has a time-limited agreement/recognition
letter with the Foundation
*On intermediate level - a legally recognized organizations that could
support an interest group, th
an way to
> control but rather to nurture an organic community. Also, we should let these
> groups name themselves.
>
>
>
>
> ________
> From: Anders Wennersten
> To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2009 12:03:5
start for a contract with these new
entities. Yearly renewal periods and regular reporting should be OK in
these cases..
Anders Wennersten
treasurer Wikimedia Sverige
Member of ChapCom
> Aside from the new chapters, right now the Board of Trustees is looking
> at what kinds of rela
10 matches
Mail list logo
