Am 13.03.2012 03:39, schrieb Andreas Kolbe:
It's not me who's uploading hundreds of pornographic media onto Wikimedia
sites. There are places for porn online, just like there are places for
online poker, and amateur digital art. I have no problem with any of them.
But listen to yourself – you
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Tobias Oelgarte
tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 03:39, schrieb Andreas Kolbe:
No. I'm not accusing you for prudery, but for making wrong cited
statements. Your assumption is that we have to sacrifice neutrality to
please a audience that
Am 13.03.2012 10:39, schrieb Andreas Kolbe:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Tobias Oelgarte
tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 03:39, schrieb Andreas Kolbe:
No. I'm not accusing you for prudery, but for making wrong cited
statements. Your assumption is that we have to
I'm speaking as an individual here, not on behalf of my chapter.
The problem that the English language Wikipedia has that the German
language one does not, is that we cover countries as far apart as the
libertarian micronation of 'Sealand
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Sealand'
On 12 March 2012 12:28, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
deepest parts of the US bible belt, and areas such as Pakistan and India,
which have sizeable English-speaking populations and a very strong religious
vein. With such a diverse worldwide readership on one language,
Hoi,
When you consider that the current proposal is for a system where it takes
one click to see something anyway, I do think the notion that something is
not knowable is over the top.
Thanks,
Gerard
On 12 March 2012 14:07, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 March 2012 12:28,
On 12 March 2012 13:55, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
When you consider that the current proposal is for a system where it takes
one click to see something anyway, I do think the notion that something is
not knowable is over the top.
The rationale is problematic: to
Hoi,
That is beside the point. You are against the proposal that is on the
table. It is a compromise. Now the fact that some want much more and you
want much less makes it a compromise.
So what gives, why do you refer to the opposing point of view ? Why not
accept the proposal as is and leave it
The bible belt phrase that some people throw around in this discussion is
just a stand-in for anti-Americanism and a sign of profound ignorance. It's
best ignored, along with the people who use it.
___
foundation-l mailing list
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Searchlimit=250offset=20redirs=0profile=imagessearch=male+human
So unless I want to see 100 dicks and arseholes I am somehow against *
knowledge*?
Hoi,
In the Netherlands we have our own bible belt.. it is not exclusive to the
USA
Thanks,
Gerard
On 12 March 2012 16:43, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
The bible belt phrase that some people throw around in this discussion is
just a stand-in for anti-Americanism and a sign of profound
on 3/12/12 11:43 AM, Nathan at nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
The bible belt phrase that some people throw around in this discussion is
just a stand-in for anti-Americanism and a sign of profound ignorance. It's
best ignored, along with the people who use it.
Nathan, how on earth do you equate the
On 12 March 2012 16:34, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
...
You got this the wrong way round, mate. All those pictures of dicks and
arseholes are preventing people from learning what they might want to
learn, because actual worthwhile knowledge is crowded out by all the dicks
and
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Marc Riddell michaeldavi...@comcast.netwrote:
on 3/12/12 11:43 AM, Nathan at nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
The bible belt phrase that some people throw around in this discussion
is
just a stand-in for anti-Americanism and a sign of profound ignorance.
It's
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Fae fae...@gmail.com wrote:
Strangely enough, searching Commons for Male figure rather than
Male human shows me artwork from the National Museum of African Art
and a Michelangelo Buonarroti sketch from the Louvre in top matches.
No problem with wading through
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Fae fae...@gmail.com wrote:
Strangely enough, searching Commons for Male figure rather than
Male human shows me artwork from the National Museum of African Art
and a Michelangelo
???
Hubertl
Am 12.03.2012 16:43, schrieb Nathan:
The bible belt phrase that some people throw around in this discussion is
just a stand-in for anti-Americanism and a sign of profound ignorance. It's
best ignored, along with the people who use it.
___
Am 12.03.2012 18:02, schrieb Marc Riddell:
on 3/12/12 11:43 AM, Nathan at nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
The bible belt phrase that some people throw around in this discussion is
just a stand-in for anti-Americanism and a sign of profound ignorance. It's
best ignored, along with the people who use
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Fae fae...@gmail.com wrote:
Strangely enough, searching Commons for Male figure rather than
Male human shows me artwork from the National Museum of African Art
and a Michelangelo Buonarroti sketch from the Louvre in top matches.
No problem with wading through
I'm tired to reply to this kind of comments since I said anything
important multiple times already. So I will keep it as that and only
write the following:
Sorry, but your comments are total bullshit¹ and you know it.
¹ includes strong language, overly repeated selective examples,
bending
On 12 March 2012 20:24, Tobias Oelgarte tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm tired to reply to this kind of comments since I said anything important
multiple times already. So I will keep it as that and only write the
following:
Sorry, but your comments are total bullshit¹ and you know
Andreas,
I am not going to express an opinion on the case you reference, this is
still a hot debate, particularly on Commons, and I do not believe there is
a stable consensus yet. I certainly have no personal interest in being
continually dragged into penis wars or be forced to read criminal
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:29 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 March 2012 20:24, Tobias Oelgarte tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I'm tired to reply to this kind of comments since I said anything
important
multiple times already. So I will keep it as that and only
I would like it the other way:
Why should some minorities force a worldwide project to obay their point of
view regarding images or other controversial content?
Why should the german speaking community collect funds for this filtering and
hiding project?
Every community is free to discuss
24 matches
Mail list logo
