2009/11/8 :
> The reason I asked for no personal attacks is because the above, by you,
> sounds very much like : "You are the problem. You are a problem."
Actually, you are the problem. Your posts to foundation-l of late have
pretty much entirely been self-aggrandising noise and the meta-issue
In a message dated 11/8/2009 2:06:47 AM Pacific Standard Time,
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com writes:
> Your notion that you "deserve" at least as much room to experiment as the
> worst of us is a fallacy. You have been made aware that there is an issue
> and that relevant people refuse to post on th
Hoi,
This was not meant as an attack. What I intended to do is rebut your
arguments. When this is considered as a personal attack, it means that it is
not possible to respond to you and reply to your arguments.
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/11/8
> In a message dated 11/8/2009 2:06:47 AM Pacific Stan
In a message dated 11/8/2009 2:06:47 AM Pacific Standard Time,
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com writes:
> When you learn from your research that we have a problem, you only
> confirm
> what is already known. The only question I have is, will this make a
> difference to you?>>
No personal attacks Gera
Hoi,
Please do your research.. but do not expect that people did not look at the
numbers before. So the person that most needs to be convinced is yourself.
Your notion that you "deserve" at least as much room to experiment as the
worst of us is a fallacy. You have been made aware that there is an
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 5:13 AM, wrote:
> Is there a way to create a chart showing how many messages each poster has
> posted to the list? Also Gerard I think if you're going to use an argument
> about the value of those people who *aren't* posting, we need to know who
> they are. Perhaps we do
I will in the next few days, create a list which shows who, each month, has
posted the most messages to the list. Or perhaps the top few. I was
surprised, seeing the statistics page, at how few active participants there
are.
Really just a handful, and it's been that way, for quite a long tim
Gerard may post quite a bit, but in general his posts serve a purpose. Many
people on this list seem to write just to see their words, that is to say,
they seem repeat information and attempt to reply to every e-mail. This is
not constructive and it is not conducive to the expansion of knowledge.
In a message dated 11/8/2009 12:30:05 AM Pacific Standard Time,
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com writes:
> Now if you think that you need to
> pass judgement on this, you have a self centred world. That is very much
> part of the issue. The issue is that the context of the issue IS clear
> from
> my o
Hoi,
If you want statistics, you do not have to google ... there are our own
statistics ...
http://www.infodisiac.com/Wikipedia/ScanMail/_PowerPosters.html I am a power
poster and that often does not feel good. However, it is beside the point.
I am on a conference and it is from people who are ess
There is already a statistics page,
http://www.infodisiac.com/Wikipedia/ScanMail/Index.html
skype: node.ue
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 1:13 AM, wrote:
> In a message dated 11/7/2009 11:28:13 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> gerard.meijs...@gmail.com writes:
>
>
> > Please read it as an appeal to reply to
In a message dated 11/7/2009 11:28:13 PM Pacific Standard Time,
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com writes:
> Please read it as an appeal to reply to foundation-l in moderation.
> Please
> read it as an appeal to post liberally to this list as we do not have an
> alternative.>>
> ---
>
>
Hoi,
I am at the Commons usability conference in Paris. I am not on any internal
mailing lists. It has become painfully obvious that as a consequence of a
refusal to any longer post on the foundation-l by several people present at
this conference, the use of foundation-l has been severely diminishe
13 matches
Mail list logo
