On 12/12/09 1:49 PM, "Brian Cameron" wrote:
>
> However, since this problem seems to really happen only on rare
> occasion, and since it does not seem that any non-free organizations
> are really trying to use GNOME Planet to do any real advertising,
> then perhaps a disclaimer link to highlight
On 12/12/09 5:33 AM, "Richard Stallman" wrote:
>
> What happened there is that some people misunderstood a joke in my
> speech, and others mistakenly accused me of intentionally disparaging
> people.
I personally find it telling that you somehow managed to find it within
yourself to provide an a
On 12/12/09 5:34 AM, "Richard Stallman" wrote:
>
> I think GNOME activities should not grant legitimacy to non-free
> software.
You're entitled to your opinion, but not to impose it on unwilling others.
> This is a minimal form of support for the cause of software
> users' freedom -- minimal in
Em 12-12-2009 11:31, Philip Van Hoof escreveu:
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 09:51 +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
I have a personal blog and when I asked planet.openmoko.org to add my
posts, I gave them the RSS feed corresponding to posts under the tag
OpenMoko.
Perhaps it would be a simpler sug
We _were_ attempting to finalize a Code of Conduct which could be provided
to speakers, in the hope of avoiding future instances of the sort of
"harmless fun" we experienced during Mr. Stallman's keynote at the Gran
Canaria Desktop Summit, as I recall.
What happened there is that s
I believe Stormy was quite clear and on point: It sounded to me as though
she were arguing against the sort of "prior restraint" that you seem to be
attempting to impose here.
I think GNOME activities should not grant legitimacy to non-free
software. This is a minimal form of support
Is GNOME part of any anti-proprietary software movement?
that terminology didn't come from me. I would rather describe what we
are doing in positive terms: GNOME is part of the free software
movement, which strives to give users freedom.
I don't think so and I've never seen it like that.
Gnome supports both the free software movement as well as proprietary
developers, and that is why Gnome for years has encouraged the use of
the LGPL license for all of its libraries.
The decision you and I made, in the early days, was to use the LGPL
for the more basic and general libr
Philip:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:20:50 -0600 Brian Cameron wrote:
Richard's suggestion that a "mild approach" may be appropriate does
not seem over-the-top to me. Perhaps a "mild approach" could be
something simple like a disclaimer on planet...
I don't think Richard is suggesting that as "m
Hi!
> I have a personal blog and when I asked planet.openmoko.org to add my
> posts, I gave them the RSS feed corresponding to posts under the tag
> OpenMoko.
>
> Perhaps it would be a simpler suggestion to pass on the aggregated
> bloggers that after date X only posts with the tag GNOME will
(I'm replying the two of you at the same time in an attempt at reducing
the thread's size)
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:20:50 -0600 Brian Cameron wrote:
> Richard's suggestion that a "mild approach" may be appropriate does
> not seem over-the-top to me. Perhaps a "mild approach" could be
> something s
Em 11-12-2009 18:20, Brian Cameron escreveu:
If there is enough people to do a vote, that's great.
My vote: -1
I do not think that people should be discouraged from suggesting rules
for the GNOME community, and a reaction like leaving the GNU community
because Richard made a suggestion could b
12 matches
Mail list logo
