Your message made me aware of the GNOME Ambassadors program, so I read
the page http://live.gnome.org/Ambassadors to learn about it.
There is a subtle but deep difference between the goal stated in that
page, To ... teach people the advantages of using a free desktop,
and teaching them the idea
On 06/01/2010 02:30 PM, Vincent Untz wrote:
Hi,
I originally wanted to have some questions included in the list of
questions sent by the membership committee, but I feel like waiting for
Friday while the voting period is already opened is waiting a long time
and I'm not being patient here :-)
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Richard Stallman r...@gnu.org wrote:
* LWN.net agreement - status
o The GNOME Foundation received the legal agreement from the
lawyers and this has been shared this with LWN. Once this
is finalized, work with
People and corporations will not choose Free Software (or Open Source,
or any derivative flavour) because it's free.
Stating that as a broad, universal claim goes against the facts.
Many people have already chosen free software precisely for the sake
of freedom. So have some national and
I would think it being fine to say, GNOME is:
- Linux kernel
- D-Bus
- NetworkManager/BlueZ/PolicyKit/udisks/upower
- X11
all the way to GTK+/Clutter combination and apps
It seems like stretching things that a GUI desktop
includes all the lower level facilities it runs on.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Richard Stallman r...@gnu.org wrote:
I would think it being fine to say, GNOME is:
- Linux kernel
- D-Bus
- NetworkManager/BlueZ/PolicyKit/udisks/upower
- X11
all the way to GTK+/Clutter combination and apps
It seems like stretching things
