On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 22:03 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Hi, perhaps a little late to the party here but I thought I'd ask
> anyway. One of the most frequent enhancements people suggest to
> gnome-software is the ability to donate to both upstream applications,
> and to independent developers. Th
On 21 May 2014 12:24, Emily Gonyer wrote:
> Sure, those of us who are not currently paid can speak up on mailing lists,
> but we're (mostly) roundly ignored.
I think this is a classic case of "code speaks" -- i.e. if you're
willing to spend the time writing the feature and maintaining the code
f
Hey,
Some of you may know me (I've been around for a long time), but for
those who don't, let me introduce myself: I've been a GNOME translator
since 2008 (pt_BR team). In 2012 I participated in the Google Summer
of Code program working in GNOME Documents. Since then, I've been
contributing here a
Hi, perhaps a little late to the party here but I thought I'd ask
anyway. One of the most frequent enhancements people suggest to
gnome-software is the ability to donate to both upstream applications,
and to independent developers. This is something I think we need to
address if we want random deve
On 21 May 2014 10:14, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Suggesting that we don't have GNOME's best interests at heart is
> just hurtful, and incorrect.
Agreed. I've never once been told by anyone at Red Hat to do something
that I didn't think was in the best interests of GNOME as a project.
Richard
__
