Re: GNOME Travel Committee Travel Policy: A proposal for consideration and feedback

2009-02-24 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, I of course have no problem with a web form for requesting sponsorship, but I would like to see us have, like the Linux Foundation, something that people sign which lists the obligations they have in return for travel support (actually attending, for example - I don't want to see us

Re: GNOME Travel Committee Travel Policy: A proposal for consideration and feedback

2009-02-20 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote: Summarising all the discussion a bit: - a travel committee is suggested to take out the huge work of processing sponsorship applications from the GUADEC committee Also (perhaps principally?) to provide consistency, transparency, and fiscal responsibility

Re: GNOME Travel Committee Travel Policy: A proposal for consideration and feedback

2009-02-20 Thread Germán Póo-Caamaño
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 11:20 +0100, Dave Neary wrote: [..] I think, nevertheless, that it is essential that the board not push the entire responsibility for reimbursement policy to a nominated travel committee - it's the board's role to guide the travel committee on how they should make

Re: GNOME Travel Committee Travel Policy: A proposal for consideration and feedback

2009-02-19 Thread Diego Escalante Urrelo
On 2/18/09, Bruno Boaventura brunoboavent...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote: Note that I'm not against a generalized co-pay policy, I'm just concerned about making it a rule set to stone that would have an impact on our ability to

Re: GNOME Travel Committee Travel Policy: A proposal for consideration and feedback

2009-02-18 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi! (If you feel strongly that it is a good idea, now is the time to speak up.) I think it's a good idea except for students! Regards, Johannes signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil ___ foundation-list mailing

Re: GNOME Travel Committee Travel Policy: A proposal for consideration and feedback

2009-02-18 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, One other thing, then I'll make my peace. Bruno Boaventura wrote: I'm with Claudio on this issue. Last year I could not go to GUADEC if I had to pay 200 € (wait to be reimbursed has been difficult). GUADEC should be a special case. A person who shall rename nameless (unless he wants to

Re: GNOME Travel Committee Travel Policy: A proposal for consideration and feedback

2009-02-18 Thread Bruno Boaventura
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote: Note that I'm not against a generalized co-pay policy, I'm just concerned about making it a rule set to stone that would have an impact on our ability to foster future contributors. That's my position too. Co-pay policy is

Re: GNOME Travel Committee Travel Policy: A proposal for consideration and feedback

2009-02-18 Thread Bruno Boaventura
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote: Hi Bruno, Hey, Dave! You are making an assumption of unlimited funds! I'm not disagreeing out of the co-pay policy, I'm just thinking that we don't need fixed values to do this. The committee can treat each case separately.

Re: GNOME Travel Committee Travel Policy: A proposal for consideration and feedback

2009-02-17 Thread Stormy Peters
Claudio, I think the 200 € was intended to apply to GUADEC. GUADEC is most of our travel money. But it could be set on a case by case and could even be lowered or waived on a case-by-case basis. (If we adopt it.) Stormy On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Claudio Saavedra csaave...@gnome.orgwrote:

Re: GNOME Travel Committee Travel Policy: A proposal for consideration and feedback

2009-02-17 Thread Bruno Boaventura
Hey Stormy, Dave and Claudio! Seriously, I don't like this. Telling a student who's been contributing on his free time to the project that he needs to request special consideration if he can't afford those 200 € could even cause him not to apply at all. I think GUADEC is a special kind of

Re: GNOME Travel Committee Travel Policy: A proposal for consideration and feedback

2009-02-17 Thread Bruno Boaventura
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote: I have to point out here, that when I got sponsored in Vilanova, my contributions weren't that many to the point that I felt kind of guilty. But the fact that I was there really boost my enthusiasm, involvement and I felt

Re: GNOME Travel Committee Travel Policy: A proposal for consideration and feedback

2009-02-17 Thread Stormy Peters
I feel strongly that students should be covered completely. I'd suggest that as a standard policy whatever we decide on the 200. Stormy On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Bruno Boaventura brunoboavent...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote: I

Re: GNOME Travel Committee Travel Policy: A proposal for consideration and feedback

2009-02-11 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Jason D. Clinton wrote: What should people who want to apply for Gran Caneria GUADEC do at this point? Also, it seems like anyone who might ask for help at some point in the future would be someone who shouldn't sit on the committee (to avoid accusation of COI). We haven't finalised

GNOME Travel Committee Travel Policy: A proposal for consideration and feedback

2009-02-10 Thread Stormy Peters
The GNOME Board of Directors is proposing a GNOME Travel Committee to handle travel assistance for GNOME developers traveling to events. The GNOME Foundation supports the GNOME project and one important way of doing that is sponsoring contributors to travel to GNOME events like conferences and

Re: GNOME Travel Committee Travel Policy: A proposal for consideration and feedback

2009-02-10 Thread Stormy Peters
You can find the missing attachment (the application form for travel assistance) at http://live.gnome.org/Travel?action=AttachFiledo=viewtarget=gnome_travel_subsidy.odt. Stormy On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Stormy Peters sto...@gnome.org wrote: The GNOME Board of Directors is proposing a