Re: AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud?

2000-09-06 Thread Kirk D Carver
>From our in house AB guru: " I do not know of a situation in which it wouldn't work at 19.2K, but the bandwidth requirement is small: the bottleneck is the GP, not the DF1 line. If he's actually getting real empirical results back showing a huge ==x2 improvement when moving the DF1 connectio

RE: AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud?

2000-09-06 Thread Wright,Jason
David, I have seen it this way on account of cable length. Right or wrong, the Site Planning/Installation section of the Integrators for Allen-Bradley Controllers document (B0193RG-C on page 52), "For Reliable communicaition, however, the shorter (20 feet) cable should be used in configurations u

RE: AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud?

2000-09-07 Thread Campbell John C
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: September 6, 2000 2:04 PM > To: Foxboro DCS Mail List > Subject: Re: AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud? > > > > From our in house AB guru: > > " I do not know of a situation in which it wouldn't work at 19.2K, but > the > bandwidth re

Re: AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud?

2000-09-07 Thread MURPHY_JAMES_D
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Foxboro DCS Mail List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: Re: AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud? >From our in house AB guru: " I do not know of a situation in which it wouldn't work at 19.2K, but the bandwidth requirement is small: the bottleneck is the GP, n

Re: AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud?

2000-09-07 Thread Glen
The newer revision KF2's do have the 19.2K option. But unless you make a 12' cable don't try it. It will be slower than 9600 with all the retry's. Glen Bounds - Original Message ----- Subject: Re: AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud? > > This confused me more than helped t

RE: AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud?

2000-09-07 Thread Kirk D Carver
s John Campbell > -Original Message- > From: Kirk D Carver [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: September 6, 2000 2:04 PM > To: Foxboro DCS Mail List > Subject: Re: AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud? > > > > From our in house AB guru: > > " I do not kn

Re: AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud?

2000-09-07 Thread Kirk D Carver
0 01:03:37 PM Please respond to Foxboro DCS Mail List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Foxboro DCS Mail List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: Re: AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud? >From our in house AB guru: " I do not know of a situation in which it wouldn't work at 19.2K

Re: AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud?

2000-09-07 Thread Kirk D Carver
ED]> on 09/07/2000 10:24:04 AM Please respond to "Foxboro DCS Mail List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Foxboro DCS Mail List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: (bcc: Kirk D Carver/Beaumont/Mobil-Notes) Subject: Re: AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud? The newer revision KF2

RE: AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud?

2000-09-08 Thread Alan J Schaff
ptember 6, 2000 2:04 PM > To: Foxboro DCS Mail List > Subject: Re: AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud? > > > > From our in house AB guru: > > " I do not know of a situation in which it wouldn't work at 19.2K, but > the > bandwidth requirement is small: the bottle

RE: AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud?

2000-09-08 Thread Campbell John C
gards John > -Original Message- > From: Alan J Schaff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: September 8, 2000 6:49 AM > To: Foxboro DCS Mail List > Subject: RE: AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud? > > John, > We are looking at using the radio modem for a remote PLC. We are go