Marco van de Voort wrote:
Some of these target functionality (specially in the linking section) might
require restructures
related to
* introduction of an internal linker for some core platforms (no more LD)
* Rewrite of module (unit) handling
Yes, these would be great, IMHO.
For the
>> I am investigating a crash of lazarus on the amd64 platfrom.
>>
>> Part of the backtrace looks like this:
>> #18 0x00434ea0 in TAPPLICATION__RUN (this=Cannot access memory
>> at address 0x8000ed18
>> ) at application.inc:980
>>
>> Note the parameter of TApplication.Run is not shown,
> I am investigating a crash of lazarus on the amd64 platfrom.
>
> Part of the backtrace looks like this:
> #18 0x00434ea0 in TAPPLICATION__RUN (this=Cannot access memory
> at address 0x8000ed18
> ) at application.inc:980
>
> Note the parameter of TApplication.Run is not shown, becau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>Can you create a small example which shows the problem? BTW: Which OS do you
>>use? Win or other?
>
> OS: Linux
> fpc 2.1.1 from svn.
Fixed in svn.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.fre
Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am investigating a crash of lazarus on the amd64 platfrom.
>
> Part of the backtrace looks like this:
> #18 0x00434ea0 in TAPPLICATION__RUN (this=Cannot access memory
> at address 0x8000ed18
> ) at application.inc:980
>
> Note the parameter of TAp
my marks start with :
- Original Message -
From: "Ales Katona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FPC developers' list"
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] Re: [fpc-l] type discussion
> Gerhard Scholz wrote:
>
> >>> var
> >>> x : type1, y : t
Hi,
I am investigating a crash of lazarus on the amd64 platfrom.
Part of the backtrace looks like this:
#18 0x00434ea0 in TAPPLICATION__RUN (this=Cannot access memory
at address 0x8000ed18
) at application.inc:980
Note the parameter of TApplication.Run is not shown, because of the
Hi,
Can somebody explain what is the difference between a ptrint and a sizeint.
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/system/ptrint.html
and
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/system/sizeint.html
indicate there is a difference, but are there systems where these two
are different?
Vince
I tried this example, but it does compile! No problem!
- Original Message -
From: 杨哲
To: fpc bug
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 4:10 AM
Subject: [fpc-devel] Fwd: bug report
fpc 2.0.0 win32
problem:
I can't see pi in proceudre pre but I can see it in procedure kmp.
pre is a procedure
Gerhard Scholz wrote:
var
x : type1, y : type2 ;
x *:= y ;
in my humble opinion(IMHO):
:= is based on the fact that A: is written normaly in math etc. where it
means " this is a fact about A "
So when someone writes A:=5; it means "it's a fact that A
- Original Message -
From: "Marco van de Voort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FPC developers' list"
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] Re: [fpc-l] type discussion
>... (shortened)
> >
> > Useful extensions I would see:
> >
> > bigger sets: set of -10..10
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:11:37PM +0200, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 03:22:10PM +0200, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> >
> >>Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> Hi.
>
> >
El Miércoles, 1 de Junio de 2005 13:50, Marco van de Voort escribió:
> Main plans short term to my knowledge are:
> ...
> * improved "packages" and dynamic libraries (PIC!) support in general.
Sorry if I've been confused by "improved". Is PIC already supported?
--
saludos,
Nico Aragón
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 03:22:10PM +0200, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>
>>Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>>
Hi.
Now I'm working on porting our Delphi database application (cca 100
000 lines) to FreeP
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 03:22:10PM +0200, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> Now I'm working on porting our Delphi database application (cca 100
> >> 000 lines) to FreePascal. I
> >> have some lit
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Now I'm working on porting our Delphi database application (cca 100
>> 000 lines) to FreePascal. I
>> have some little patches principally around TDataset. Where can I send
>> this patches?
>
>
> Send
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
Now I'm working on porting our Delphi database application (cca 100 000 lines)
to FreePascal. I
have some little patches principally around TDataset. Where can I send this
patches?
Send them to me.
Our application is now possible to transl
Hi.
Now I'm working on porting our Delphi database application (cca 100 000 lines)
to FreePascal. I
have some little patches principally around TDataset. Where can I send this
patches?
Our application is now possible to translate in fpc, but first problem was
unfunctional VarArrayCreate([0, 1],
> I followed this discussion if that construction (see below) should be
> allowed or not (I think it should be allowed, but it's possible to live
> without it; I can imagine situations where it could make easier to read),
> and I'm missing a bit a discussion forum about the future of FPC. It
> shou
> I've read somewhere that Delphi 7 compatibility is planned (since I do not
> have it I do not know what that means in detail).
Main plans short term to my knowledge are:
* create/improve the COM/OLE support. This has multiple facets:
o COM compat interfaces/vmt
o Va
I followed this discussion if that construction (see below) should be
allowed or not (I think it should be allowed, but it's possible to live
without it; I can imagine situations where it could make easier to read),
and I'm missing a bit a discussion forum about the future of FPC. It should
contain
21 matches
Mail list logo
