>> > I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL.
>>
>> fpnet package. The FCL is only basic stuff, some extended RTL. IMHO the
>> fpimage,db and xml shall also be moved to fpimage, fpdb and fpxml
>> packages.
>
> Why prefix everything with fp ?
I think it will be more obvious as
On 2/3/06, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Packages are not necessarily class based, are often simple imports of
> libraries and so on; not the place for VCL/CLX counterparts.
I don't want to get into the fp discussion, but I think that many
things on FCL are not the counter-part
I'll be honest to say that I don't care much if it's in FCL or
Packages/Bare or Extra but the fp is not going to happen.
Names are already done and they are used, I can't rename the API.
Ales
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
h
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 12:41:49 +0100
Ales Katona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try 2...
>
And almost the same sendfile support for linux. Uses the 64bit sendfile
syscall per default.
Micha
sendfile-linux.tar.gz
Description: Binary data
___
fpc-devel ma
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Peter Vreman wrote:
> >> > I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL.
> >>
> >> fpnet package. The FCL is only basic stuff, some extended RTL. IMHO the
> >> fpimage,db and xml shall also be moved to fpimage, fpdb and fpxml
> >> packages.
> >
> > Why prefix e
>> > I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL.
>>
>> fpnet package. The FCL is only basic stuff, some extended RTL. IMHO the
>> fpimage,db and xml shall also be moved to fpimage, fpdb and fpxml
>> packages.
>
> Why prefix everything with fp ?
To have a common prefix that shows i
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:11:23 +0100 (CET)
"Peter Vreman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL.
>
> fpnet package. The FCL is only basic stuff, some extended RTL. IMHO the
> fpimage,db and xml shall also be moved to fpimage, fpdb and fpxml
> pack
>
>
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Ales Katona wrote:
>
>> I was wondering if I could put lNet library (for those who don't know,
>> go to
>> http://members.chello.sk/ales ) into packages.
>
> I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL.
fpnet package. The FCL is only basic stuff, some exte
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Ales Katona wrote:
I was wondering if I could put lNet library (for those who don't know, go to
http://members.chello.sk/ales ) into packages.
I'm all for it. The question is: base or extra. Or even FCL.
Michael.
___
fpc-devel
I was wondering if I could put lNet library (for those who don't know,
go to http://members.chello.sk/ales ) into packages.
What do you think?
Ales
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:36:47PM +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > Defining the syscall numbers is independent of choosing the target linux
> > kernel, right ?
>
> It should. But sometimes call names are changed to _old and new ones with
> the same name appear (with e.g. rt_ prefixed).
>
>
Does svn client create a logfile somewhere that could possibly give me
more hints as to what is going wrong?
Graeme.
On 2/3/06, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> > I can access all other repositories without error.
> >
> > Repositories I tested:
> >
> > Ap
On 2/3/06, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already did a checkout just to test this for you.
Umm... Thanks for the test. Back to Googling
Graeme.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.or
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I can access all other repositories without error.
Repositories I tested:
Apache svn - no problems
TechInsite running apache on Windows - no problems
FPC and Lazarus - error mentioned below.
All the above repositories run via HTTP using apache.
I did a Google search a
I can access all other repositories without error.
Repositories I tested:
Apache svn - no problems
TechInsite running apache on Windows - no problems
FPC and Lazarus - error mentioned below.
All the above repositories run via HTTP using apache.
I did a Google search and found similar reports fo
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Has something changed on the SVN repository? For the last week I
cannot get updates from SVN for FPC or Lazarus. I was using svn
command line client ver.1.2.3
I just saw a new version of SVN was released, so thought that was the
problem, so upgraded to ver.1.3.0 and st
Has something changed on the SVN repository? For the last week I
cannot get updates from SVN for FPC or Lazarus. I was using svn
command line client ver.1.2.3
I just saw a new version of SVN was released, so thought that was the
problem, so upgraded to ver.1.3.0 and still I cannot do an update o
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Fri, 3 Feb 2006, schreef Amir Aavani:
Any one call a webservice (WSDL) from Freepascal. I did it using Delphi, but
now i want to do it by freepascal/Lazarus.
You are as clear as saying "I live in Europe and don't like my
neighbourhood". Plea
Op Fri, 3 Feb 2006, schreef Amir Aavani:
>
> Any one call a webservice (WSDL) from Freepascal. I did it using Delphi, but
> now i want to do it by freepascal/Lazarus.
You are as clear as saying "I live in Europe and don't like my
neighbourhood". Please be more specific.
Daniel
__
Any one call a webservice (WSDL) from Freepascal. I did it using Delphi,
but now i want to do it by freepascal/Lazarus.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On 3 feb 2006, at 12:36, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I think most will have a 2.6 kernel by now, except for people running
odd architectures with lazy kernel maintainers.
IIRC FC4 comes standard with at least 2.4 as choice. Don't
underestimate
peopl that run under standard circumstances.
T
Try 2...
--- Begin Message ---
This is an update kqueue and a sendfile support for freeBSD with example.
Kqueue will run on all BSDs (I've added other syscall_nrs for it) but
sendfile is specific to FreeBSD.
Ales
kqueue_sendfile.tar.gz
Description: application/gzip
--- End Message ---
__
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:23:08PM +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> >
> > First sb who is more into practical aspects of the Linux kernel should say
> > which kernel we are targeting.
>
> Defining the syscall numbers is independent of choosing the target linux
> kernel, right ?
It should. Bu
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:23:08PM +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>> > Marco, is it possible to update the sysnr.inc files in
>> rtl/linux/
>> > from a newer version of the kernel ? It's probably less work than me
>> > trying to split all the syscall numbers up and you copy pasting them
>> > fo
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:23:08PM +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > Marco, is it possible to update the sysnr.inc files in rtl/linux/
> > from a newer version of the kernel ? It's probably less work than me
> > trying to split all the syscall numbers up and you copy pasting them
> > for each ar
> > Attached is a linux unit with epoll system call wrappers. Also a demo is
> > included that creates 100 pipes and writes a character to each and reads it
> > non-blockingly.
>
> Marco, is it possible to update the sysnr.inc files in rtl/linux/
> from a newer version of the kernel ? It's probabl
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 06:16:53PM +0100, Micha Nelissen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached is a linux unit with epoll system call wrappers. Also a demo is
> included that creates 100 pipes and writes a character to each and reads it
> non-blockingly.
Marco, is it possible to update the sysnr.inc files in
27 matches
Mail list logo
