On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Scott Pascoe wrote:
Daniël,
Thanks, I did that right after I sent the email and got it to generate.
Glad to know I'm thinking along the correct lines here.
Before I get too much further, the generated xml file has a comment
...
Is this indicating that it couldn't fi
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:22:39 +0200
Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > Under which category should h2pas bugs be reported?
>
> Probably the 'these-will-only-be-solved-if-you-also-provide-a-patch'
> category :-).
I know, but hope dies last.
Maybe I can raise s
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Under which category should h2pas bugs be reported?
Probably the 'these-will-only-be-solved-if-you-also-provide-a-patch'
category :-).
Micha
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/
Under which category should h2pas bugs be reported?
Mattias
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On 20/09/06, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scott Pascoe wrote:
You know also that there are gui tools to write the docs?
I was just about to mention that to Scott as well. I made some
improvements to the "lazde" (documentation editor included with
Lazarus). I am busy working o
Scott Pascoe wrote:
You know also that there are gui tools to write the docs?
> Daniël,
>
> Thanks, I did that right after I sent the email and got it to
> generate. Glad to know I'm thinking along the correct lines here.
>
> Before I get too much further, the generated xml file has a comme
Daniël,
Thanks, I did that right after I sent the email and got it to generate. Glad to know I'm thinking along the correct lines here.
Before I get too much further, the generated xml file has a comment
...
Is this indicating that it couldn't find the zbase unit?
On 9/20/06, Daniël M
Op Wed, 20 Sep 2006, schreef Scott Pascoe:
> but the result was no different.
>
> Can you give me a clue on what I'm doing wrong?
Simply fix the syntax error in the source. I think the fpc parser might
have a reason to scan the {$else} part, so it will abort. You only need to do
this once, s
Back with another question...
I've run into an error using makeskel and haven't figured out how to fix it.
running makeskel with all of the .pas files in paszlib generated an unhandled exception.
I've narrowed it down to the zbase.pas file, so a command line of :
makeskel --package=paszlib
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Scott Pascoe wrote:
Ok,
Assuming that the makeskel has been run, then it would probably need to be
fleshed out. So, would the proper location for the xml documentation file be
in the root of the fpcdoc and should it be named paszlib.xml?
Yes.
Michael.
_
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Scott Pascoe wrote:
Is the paszlib package documented in the fpcdocs?
No, it is not.
If not, I'm considering using it as my first try at documenting a
unit/package. I haven't been able to find the docs yet, so I'll assume it
doesn't exist.
Would I begin by creating
Ok,
Assuming that the makeskel has been run, then it would probably need to be fleshed out. So, would the proper location for the xml documentation file be in the root of the fpcdoc and should it be named paszlib.xml?
Thank you for the clarification and help,
On 9/20/06, Florian Klaempfl <[E
Daniël Mantione schreef:
Op Wed, 20 Sep 2006, schreef Scott Pascoe:
Is the paszlib package documented in the fpcdocs?
If not, I'm considering using it as my first try at documenting a
unit/package. I haven't been able to find the docs yet, so I'll assume it
doesn't exist.
To my knowledge t
Daniël Mantione wrote:
>
> Op Wed, 20 Sep 2006, schreef Scott Pascoe:
>
>> Is the paszlib package documented in the fpcdocs?
>>
>> If not, I'm considering using it as my first try at documenting a
>> unit/package. I haven't been able to find the docs yet, so I'll assume it
>> doesn't exist.
>
>
Op Wed, 20 Sep 2006, schreef Scott Pascoe:
> Is the paszlib package documented in the fpcdocs?
>
> If not, I'm considering using it as my first try at documenting a
> unit/package. I haven't been able to find the docs yet, so I'll assume it
> doesn't exist.
To my knowledge there exists no pas
Is the paszlib package documented in the fpcdocs?
If not, I'm considering using it as my first try at documenting a unit/package. I haven't been able to find the docs yet, so I'll assume it doesn't exist.
Would I begin by creating a paszlib.xml file in the root of the fpcdocs? or should it go
Sorry, Fat fingered the keyboard
Take two. The patch is attached.
Scott
Index: fpdoc.tex
===
--- fpdoc.tex (revision 197)
+++ fpdoc.tex (working copy)
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@
\begin{enumerate}
\item The fpdoc sources. These can
Hi,
Attached is my first documentation patch.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Hi,
Attached is a patch for fpcUnit, which adds test timing results to the
test results. Individual timings as well as overall timing.
Patch needs to be applied from the root fpc source directory.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
There's no place like 127.0.0.1
Index: fcl/fpcunit/fpcunit.pp
==
19 matches
Mail list logo