On Jan 17, 2008 9:01 PM, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See the fgl unit in current 2.2.1 or 2.3.1. Generics were not stable
> enough in the past to have the unit already enabled in 2.2.0.
Oh, thanks. In my search I had actually found this unit, but then I
looked at the unit name and sa
I think is really most important can use it ASAP.
Right ! See the latest posts in the Borland Kylix Newsgroup (that indeed
still exists :) ).
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
My questions are:
1)...when this patch will be apply to the current 2.2.x version (I
think currently it works only on the last 2.3.x version)?
The patch is not even 24 hours old and needs to stabilize first. Maybe in a
couple of months it will be considered for incl
At 20:56 17-1-2008, you wrote:
Hi Felipe,
I have never gotten onto the band wagon regarding Generics. I have
only seen the word being tossed around on the mailing lists and
newsgroups. Do you maybe have a nice link explaining Generics, what
benefits it has over TList (TObjectList and friends) a
At 18:54 17-1-2008, you wrote:
Hi to all,
can someone tell me if exists some units ables to read RAW data from a
specified section of an executable file (in all the supported
executable file format)?
What is available in FPC is already written in previous mails about
the debuginfo.
For the
At 20:40 17-1-2008, you wrote:
Hello,
I was coding and I suddently saw that need to use a typed list. I went
with TFPList, but considering we already have compiler support I
thougth that maybe we could have a basic library with useful classes
using generics. I searched on fpc 2.2.0 sources a lot
BTW : current trunk fpc is no compilable due to error in fpini,
missing crc32 function or file not added to uses clause.
Fixed.
Peter
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Hi Felipe,
I have never gotten onto the band wagon regarding Generics. I have
only seen the word being tossed around on the mailing lists and
newsgroups. Do you maybe have a nice link explaining Generics, what
benefits it has over TList (TObjectList and friends) and what I would
use it for? I ga
Hello,
I was coding and I suddently saw that need to use a typed list. I went
with TFPList, but considering we already have compiler support I
thougth that maybe we could have a basic library with useful classes
using generics. I searched on fpc 2.2.0 sources a lot, but I couldn't
find anything.
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
> >
> > Because 2.2.2 is a bugfix only release, no new features are allowed.
> >
> > Michael.
>
> I understand and agree with this position, add a new features in a
> "bugfix only" release is dangerous!
>
> Any opinion about the 2.4 release date?
No
Hi,
2008/1/17, Joao Morais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Vincent Snijders wrote:
> > Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
> >>
> >> Where I can find the "make" program (command) on Windows?
> >>
> >> On the FPC\bin I found only fpcmake.exe
> >>
> >
> > IMO, the best way to get it, is to install the latest FPC releas
Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
Hi,
2008/1/17, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
Where I can find the "make" program (command) on Windows?
On the FPC\bin I found only fpcmake.exe
IMO, the best way to get it, is to install the latest FPC release (which
you have anyway for
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
Where I can find the "make" program (command) on Windows?
On the FPC\bin I found only fpcmake.exe
IMO, the best way to get it, is to install the latest FPC release (which
you have anyway for the starting compiler as explained in the buildfaq
Hi,
2008/1/17, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
> >
> > Where I can find the "make" program (command) on Windows?
> >
> > On the FPC\bin I found only fpcmake.exe
> >
>
> IMO, the best way to get it, is to install the latest FPC release (which
> you have anyway for t
Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
Where I can find the "make" program (command) on Windows?
On the FPC\bin I found only fpcmake.exe
IMO, the best way to get it, is to install the latest FPC release (which
you have anyway for the starting compiler as explained in the buildfaq)
and get it from the co
Hi to all,
can someone tell me if exists some units ables to read RAW data from a
specified section of an executable file (in all the supported
executable file format)?
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.fre
Hi,
2008/1/17, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
> >
> > I'm very confused.
> > I cannot build it!
> > Many errors.
> >
> > Why do not add a simple .bat file able to do all the works? :(
> >
>
> I can think of several reasons:
> 1. .bat doesn't work on the majority
Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
I'm very confused.
I cannot build it!
Many errors.
Why do not add a simple .bat file able to do all the works? :(
I can think of several reasons:
1. .bat doesn't work on the majority of OS-es
2. .bat only can work in a certain default configuration
3. in this defa
Hi,
2008/1/17, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
> > Hi to all,
> >
> > I have just checkout the FPC 2.3.1 trunk from the SVN.
> >
> > Now I need to know how I can build FPC from its sources.
> >
> > Can someone help me, please?
> >
>
> Read the buildfaq:
> http://ww
Hi,
2008/1/17, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
> > Hi to all,
> >
> > I have just checkout the FPC 2.3.1 trunk from the SVN.
> >
> > Now I need to know how I can build FPC from its sources.
> >
> > Can someone help me, please?
> >
>
> Read the buildfaq:
> http://ww
Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
Hi to all,
I have just checkout the FPC 2.3.1 trunk from the SVN.
Now I need to know how I can build FPC from its sources.
Can someone help me, please?
Read the buildfaq:
http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/buildfaq.pdf
Vincent
_
Hi to all,
I have just checkout the FPC 2.3.1 trunk from the SVN.
Now I need to know how I can build FPC from its sources.
Can someone help me, please?
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
htt
Hi,
2008/1/17, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2008/1/17, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > 2008/1/17, Peter Vreman <[
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2008/1/17, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > 2008/1/17, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > Hi to all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have some questions
Hi,
2008/1/17, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2008/1/17, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > Hi to all,
> > > >
> > > > I have some questions about the last 9778 revision (related to the new
> > > > -Xg option).
>
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2008/1/17, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Hi to all,
> > >
> > > I have some questions about the last 9778 revision (related to the new
> > > -Xg option).
> > >
> > > The help tell: "-Xg now produces a .dbg file with debuginfo that
Hi,
2008/1/17, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi to all,
> >
> > I have some questions about the last 9778 revision (related to the new
> > -Xg option).
> >
> > The help tell: "-Xg now produces a .dbg file with debuginfo that can
> > be used by gdb."
> >
> > My questions are:
> >
> > 1)...w
> Hi to all,
>
> I have some questions about the last 9778 revision (related to the new
> -Xg option).
>
> The help tell: "-Xg now produces a .dbg file with debuginfo that can
> be used by gdb."
>
> My questions are:
>
> 1)...when this patch will be apply to the current 2.2.x version (I
> think cur
Hi to all,
I have some questions about the last 9778 revision (related to the new
-Xg option).
The help tell: "-Xg now produces a .dbg file with debuginfo that can
be used by gdb."
My questions are:
1)...when this patch will be apply to the current 2.2.x version (I
think currently it works only
On Thu, January 17, 2008 10:59, Peter Vreman wrote:
I think it should by default look for program.dbg file , and then if
not
exists for paramstr(0). Is that enough ? If so,please explain how to
check if file exists , which function could be used here.
>>>
>>> No, as Peter descri
Hi,
2008/1/17, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>> I think it should by default look for program.dbg file , and then if not
> >>> exists for paramstr(0). Is that enough ? If so,please explain how to
> >>> check if file exists , which function could be used here.
> >>
> >> No, as Peter describe
Bogusław Brandys schreef:
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.3.1-r9226 [2008/01/17] for i386
Oops..what I did wrong ? Look below
D:\>fpc -Xg -g p.pas
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.3.1 [2008/01/10] for i386
Maybe a little old?
Vincent
___
fpc-deve
Peter Vreman wrote:
Support for a separate .dbg file is now available for windows in
current svn trunk with the -Xg option. No need anymore for "objcopy
--only-keep-debug && objcopy --add-debug-link && strip" under
windows. The external linker (e.g. linux) still be updated to support
objcopy and
>>> I think it should by default look for program.dbg file , and then if not
>>> exists for paramstr(0). Is that enough ? If so,please explain how to
>>> check if file exists , which function could be used here.
>>
>> No, as Peter described, you should look in the executable for a link to
>> the fi
>> Support for a separate .dbg file is now available for windows in
>> current svn trunk with the -Xg option. No need anymore for "objcopy
>> --only-keep-debug && objcopy --add-debug-link && strip" under
>> windows. The external linker (e.g. linux) still be updated to support
>> objcopy and strip w
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Bogusław Brandys schreef:
I think it should by default look for program.dbg file , and then if
not exists for paramstr(0). Is that enough ? If so,please explain how
to check if file exists , which function could be used here.
No, as Peter described, you should look i
On Thu, January 17, 2008 10:45, Vincent Snijders wrote:
> BogusÅaw Brandys schreef:
>>
>> I think it should by default look for program.dbg file , and then if not
>> exists for paramstr(0). Is that enough ? If so,please explain how to
>> check if file exists , which function could be used here.
>
Bogusław Brandys schreef:
I think it should by default look for program.dbg file , and then if not
exists for paramstr(0). Is that enough ? If so,please explain how to
check if file exists , which function could be used here.
No, as Peter described, you should look in the executable for a li
Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
Hi,
2008/1/17, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
Hi to all,
I'm writing a patch to can use an external .dbg file during the
debugging process.
All works fine but when an unhandled exception is raised the RTL show
sta
Hi,
2008/1/17, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
>
> > Hi to all,
> >
> > I'm writing a patch to can use an external .dbg file during the
> > debugging process.
> >
> > All works fine but when an unhandled exception is raised the RTL show
>
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> I'm writing a patch to can use an external .dbg file during the
> debugging process.
>
> All works fine but when an unhandled exception is raised the RTL show
> stacktrace without debug info (no sources line).
>
> How I can instruct
Hi,
2008/1/17, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
> > Hi to all,
> >
> > I'm writing a patch to can use an external .dbg file during the
> > debugging process.
> >
> > All works fine but when an unhandled exception is raised the RTL show
> > stacktrace without debug i
> Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
>> Hi to all,
>>
>> I'm writing a patch to can use an external .dbg file during the
>> debugging process.
>>
>> All works fine but when an unhandled exception is raised the RTL show
>> stacktrace without debug info (no sources line).
>>
>> How I can instruct the RTL to se
Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
Hi to all,
I'm writing a patch to can use an external .dbg file during the
debugging process.
All works fine but when an unhandled exception is raised the RTL show
stacktrace without debug info (no sources line).
How I can instruct the RTL to search the debug symbols i
Hi to all,
I'm writing a patch to can use an external .dbg file during the
debugging process.
All works fine but when an unhandled exception is raised the RTL show
stacktrace without debug info (no sources line).
How I can instruct the RTL to search the debug symbols in a
project.dbg file (if no
45 matches
Mail list logo
