This program runed in valgrind brings on error:
program val;
var
n, e: Integer;
begin
System.Val('', n, e);
end.
==18377== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==18377==at 0x804EDC5:
SYSTEM_INITVAL$SHORTSTRING$BOOLEAN$BYTE$$LONGINT (sstrings.inc:768)
==18377==
On Sunday 30 March 2008 20.48:23 Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Martin Schreiber wrote:
Inline is used for subforms, components in a form which inherit from
another form (TFrame in Delphi), in MSEgui every form can be used as
inline component. The ffInline filer flag must
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Sunday 30 March 2008 20.48:23 Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Martin Schreiber wrote:
Inline is used for subforms, components in a form which inherit from
another form (TFrame in Delphi), in MSEgui every form can be used
On Sunday 30 March 2008 20.42:13 Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Martin Schreiber wrote:
I'd like to second Colins wish. Please use the same resolving order as
Delphi. MSEide+MSEgui compiles with Delphi7 so the reversed order is an
unnecessary complication and error source.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Subject: RE: [fpc-devel] Important: Call for testing.
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:21:52 +
I have noticed another incompatibility with the previous version - the
TParser object in parser.inc can now return toWString as one of the
On Monday 31 March 2008 15.00:02 Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
It is like streaming of an inherited form. Lookup the ancestor and write
the property differences.
Nono, when streaming an inherited form, the IDE provides the ancestor
instance when the streaming starts, because it calls
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Sunday 30 March 2008 20.42:13 Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Martin Schreiber wrote:
I'd like to second Colins wish. Please use the same resolving order as
Delphi. MSEide+MSEgui compiles with Delphi7 so the reversed
Op maandag 31-03-2008 om 16:13 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Michael Van
Canneyt:
Simply said: if I must reverse order, then I have to redo the whole
cleanroom stuff and it will be exactly as in Delphi. This is not an
option.
Is this about mine (cleanroom) code? Maybe I can change it? If
On Monday 31 March 2008 16.13:48 Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Martin Schreiber wrote:
I am not convinced. By controlling the order of the properties and the
load order of the forms it is possible to control the resolving order.
Does FPC loose on quality if you use the
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Monday 31 March 2008 16.13:48 Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Martin Schreiber wrote:
I am not convinced. By controlling the order of the properties and the
load order of the forms it is possible to control the resolving
Giulio Bernardi wrote:
Maybe this patch (for lazarus) solves the issue? (warning: lazarus compiles and
runs but I didn't test it).
Giulio
It seems to work reasonably OK for me. It doesn't handle the copyright
symbol quite right that was causing me problems, but I don't think the
previous
C Western schreef:
Giulio Bernardi wrote:
Maybe this patch (for lazarus) solves the issue? (warning: lazarus
compiles and runs but I didn't test it).
Giulio
It seems to work reasonably OK for me. It doesn't handle the copyright
symbol quite right that was causing me problems, but I don't
12 matches
Mail list logo
