I've some problems with building and testing an new compiler.
1) The buildfaq mentions both PP= and FPC= for the compiler, to be used
by Make. It should be made clear whether these are equivalent, or
(better) only one option should be used across the entire FAQ.
2) An unqualified reference (P
Michael Van Canneyt escreveu:
I agree that the contents/content properties should be reduced to 1
property. But this is a change which will break backwards
compatibility.
AFAIK the fpWeb interface is still in progress. Anyway, better
change now than later.
The question is: which one ?
Co
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt escreveu:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt escreveu:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Hi,
I've playing a bit with fpWeb and have some suggestio
Michael Van Canneyt escreveu:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt escreveu:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Hi,
I've playing a bit with fpWeb and have some suggestions and questions:
- In TFPWebAction.DoHandleRequest if req
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt escreveu:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Hi,
I've playing a bit with fpWeb and have some suggestions and questions:
- In TFPWebAction.DoHandleRequest if request is not handled by OnReques
Michael Van Canneyt escreveu:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Hi,
I've playing a bit with fpWeb and have some suggestions and questions:
- In TFPWebAction.DoHandleRequest if request is not handled by
OnRequest and inherited, the content is copied to the response and
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> - Content and Contents properties are redundant. Also can lead to some
>> performance issues. See the code of DoGetContent:
>>
>> If (Self.Content<>'') then
>>
On 08/03/2010 01:30 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Michael Schnell schrieb:
Regarding the hardware and without rewriting or switching the
selector table, a user land program could access 64K different
(potentially non-overlapping) address spaces (each 4 GB size) using a
selector register such
On 08/03/2010 01:37 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Michael Schnell schrieb:
You only have to determine the flat address, before storing it in
the pointer variable - @MyThreadvar?
How do you think this is possible ? How to you think it's possible in
FPC to define a pointer that does not use D
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Hi,
I've playing a bit with fpWeb and have some suggestions and questions:
- In TFPWebAction.DoHandleRequest if request is not handled by OnRequest and
inherited, the content is copied to the response and handled is checked by
the res
On 08/03/2010 01:30 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
We are doing "flat" software all the time. The last use of segmented
pointers dates back to Win3.1, with near and far pointers.
It was you who introduced the flat vs segmented paradigm in this
discussion. :)
Nonetheless, we _always_ do use
Hi,
Just a courtesy note. Michael van Canneyt has reproduced and confirmed this
compiler bug as well.
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=17093
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/
Hi,
Just thought I would let you guys know that we are more that halfway in
2010, and FPC 2.5.1 (latest trunk) still shows the copyright notice as 2009. :)
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.5.1 [2010/08/03] for x86_64
Copyright (c) 1993-2009 by Florian Klaempfl
Target OS: Linux for x86-64
...
Re
13 matches
Mail list logo
