Hi *,
In current Delphi is String synonym for base type UnicodeString UTF-16
AFAIU ATM in FPC is String synonym for AnsiString (as in previos
versions of Delphi)
Are there any plans to change meaning of String type ?
(like Delphi to UnicodeString , or UTF8String?)
Are there any plans to
Am 10.01.2011 05:15, schrieb Paul Ishenin:
10.01.2011 1:47, Andrew Brunner wrote:
Type
NS_APP=class
const
const1=2;
const3=5;
type
NS_SPACE1=class
type
Properties=(Name,Value);
TMyRecord=record
ID : integer;
Name:string;
Value:string;
end;
end;
NS_SPACE2=class
type
Properties=(Name,Value); //
On 01/10/2011 09:12 AM, LacaK wrote:
In current Delphi is String synonym for base type UnicodeString UTF-16
AFAIK, in current Delphi (which I don't have) a String is a variable
that can contain dynamically coded informations (such as locally coded
8-Bit ANSI, UTF-8, UTF-16, ...) and - of
AFAIK, in current Delphi (which I don't have) a String is a variable
that can contain dynamically coded informations (such as locally
coded 8-Bit ANSI, UTF-8, UTF-16, ...) and - of course - know which
code it holds.
I understand By default, variables declared as type String are
On 10 Jan 2011, at 09:12, LacaK wrote:
In current Delphi is String synonym for base type UnicodeString UTF-16
AFAIU ATM in FPC is String synonym for AnsiString (as in previos
versions of Delphi)
Are there any plans to change meaning of String type ?
(like Delphi to UnicodeString , or
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
In current Delphi is String synonym for base type UnicodeString UTF-16
AFAIU ATM in FPC is String synonym for AnsiString (as in previos
versions of Delphi)
Are there any plans to change meaning of String type ?
(like Delphi to UnicodeString ,
On 10 Jan 2011, at 13:33, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
In current Delphi is String synonym for base type UnicodeString
UTF-16
AFAIU ATM in FPC is String synonym for AnsiString (as in previos
versions of Delphi)
Are there any plans to change meaning of
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
If/when this is done, it will only be with a compiler switch or
directive.
(
That won't be enough, since that would not change the relevant units
and
classes to such type. (e.g. tstringlist would remain defined
ansistring)
If it's
On 10 Jan 2011, at 13:57, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
If/when this is done, it will only be with a compiler switch or
directive.
(
That won't be enough, since that would not change the relevant units
and
classes to such type. (e.g. tstringlist would
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
If it's a D2009-style ansistring, does that matter?
A lot of conversion, since it will use ansistring(0) so reading/
writing
ansistring(cp_utf8) will force conversions. (0 means system
encoding, $
means never convert)
Why should a
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
In current Delphi is String synonym for base type UnicodeString UTF-16
AFAIU ATM in FPC is String synonym for AnsiString (as in previos
versions of Delphi)
Are there any plans to change meaning of String type ?
(like Delphi to UnicodeString , or UTF8String?)
If/when
On 10 Jan 2011, at 16:27, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
Why should a tstringlist force ansistring(0)?
I mean that if you locally (for your units) set string=utf8string,
TStringList still would be ansistring(0) or whatever the default becomes.
I
On Monday, 10. January 2011 16.27:19 Marco van de Voort wrote:
And there are three such cases
- normal FPC and Delph 2007- code : ansistring(0)
- Lazarus : ansistring=utf8
- Delphi 2009+ UTF16.
- fpGUI: ansistring = utf-8
- MSEgui: existing FPC UnicodeString = utf-16
Martin
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 01:12 +, Martin wrote:
On 03/01/2011 11:30, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
I also promised to build a Windows-gdb binary with the latest Dwarf-3
patches from the Archer-project. This can be downloaded here:
On 10/01/2011 20:26, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 01:12 +, Martin wrote:
On 03/01/2011 11:30, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
I also promised to build a Windows-gdb binary with the latest Dwarf-3
patches from the Archer-project. This can be downloaded here:
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 20:43 +, Martin wrote:
On 10/01/2011 20:26, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 01:12 +, Martin wrote:
On 03/01/2011 11:30, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
I also promised to build a Windows-gdb binary with the latest Dwarf-3
patches from the
procedure Something(Param1...);
var
my:TMyData;
procedure Testing; inline; // or whatever
begin
my.test:=0;
end;
begin
MyAPI.DoeSomething(Param1,@Testing);
end;
I want to be able to pass Testing as a variable so the callback can
occur but realize that FPC did not like nested
I did read this however, I don't have the option of rewriting all the
other implements to my api to declare as nested...
http://wiki.freepascal.org/FPC_New_Features_Trunk#Support_for_nested_procedure_variables
___
fpc-devel maillist -
I did some more test., I will check in later...
None of the old dwarf or stabs seems to define the operator for classes.
p FooBar
gives unknown symbold FooBar
So it does take it as one symbol?
nil
nil is not defined ever.
but under stabs dwarf2 Foo=0 works
Dwarf 3:
While the debugger can
On 11/01/2011 00:23, Martin wrote:
I did some more test., I will check in later...
Variant has also changed. Maybe intended, but no result can be optained...
*** gdb 7.2-50 (fpc trunk / Dwarf3) TTestWatches TTestWatches
TestWatches
ptype ArgVariantInt
ptype ArgVariantInt\n
~type =
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Andrew Brunner
andrew.t.brun...@gmail.comwrote:
I did read this however, I don't have the option of rewriting all the
other implements to my api to declare as nested...
http://wiki.freepascal.org/FPC_New_Features_Trunk#Support_for_nested_procedure_variables
21 matches
Mail list logo
