On 2011-05-17 20:36, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Please update packages/Makefile* and try again. I added a dependency
of fppkg on fcl-web
Michael.
Thank you, it works now.
Regards
Žilvinas
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.or
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Žilvinas Ledas wrote:
Hello all,
is it me, or compilation is broken (revision: 17482):
<...>
Fatal: Can't find unit fphttpclient used by pkgfphttp
Fatal: Compilation aborted
make[4]: *** [pkgfphttp.ppu] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory
`E:/lazarus/fpc/fpc_my/source_SVN
Hello all,
is it me, or compilation is broken (revision: 17482):
<...>
Fatal: Can't find unit fphttpclient used by pkgfphttp
Fatal: Compilation aborted
make[4]: *** [pkgfphttp.ppu] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory
`E:/lazarus/fpc/fpc_my/source_SVN___/packages/fppkg'
make[3]: *** [fpc_smart] E
Am Tue, 17 May 2011 13:38:35 +0100
schrieb Martin :
> Going for educational.. or theoretical...
You understand, it is not even easy for someone to have a need ore a
valid use for an macro, after 30 years without? Then crutch macro
support that fpc has, makes that not better. It makes people preve
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Inoussa OUEDRAOGO wrote:
2011/5/17 Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Inoussa OUEDRAOGO wrote:
I've committed simple HTTP server (threaded or not) and HTTP Client
components to FCL-Web. They work using the fcl-net ssockets unit. (for
which
a fix has been comm
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 05/17/2011 01:10 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Will you look at it, or would you like me to do it ?
It would be just great if an example project would come with the components.
There are example projects (see my initial mail).
Michael.
Hi, I did an ssh tunnel to a remote server that has a Firebird 2.5 database,
this way, my computer can connect to that database by simply pointing to
'localhost', this works when I connect through FlameRobin, but I can't make it
work using this simple program:
program dbtest;
{$mode objfpc}
use
On 05/17/2011 02:13 PM, Inoussa OUEDRAOGO wrote:
It is getting better. At least on WinXP/32 I can the fpc test suite,
there are some failed tests, but not that much.
Check it out and test it by yourself. Tests (preferably validated with
delphi) are welcome.
Sounds good. I frequently do check
On 17/05/2011 13:19, Joerg Schuelke wrote:
Am Tue, 17 May 2011 12:59:57 +0100
schrieb Martin:
Based on this. The question is does the benefits really outweigh the
cost ?
Of course not. The much writing shows there is only Hans-Peter possibly
for a try. I thought that some of the reasons where
Am Tue, 17 May 2011 12:59:57 +0100
schrieb Martin :
> Based on this. The question is does the benefits really outweigh the
> cost ?
>
Of course not. The much writing shows there is only Hans-Peter possibly
for a try. I thought that some of the reasons where only educational ;-)
Regards
2011/5/17 Michael Schnell
> On 05/17/2011 01:19 PM, Inoussa OUEDRAOGO wrote:
>
>> I am busy right now with cpstrnew.
>>
> Yeah ! Great !
>
> Can you say anything about the state of same ?
>
It is getting better. At least on WinXP/32 I can the fpc test suite, there
are some failed tests, but not
On 05/17/2011 01:19 PM, Inoussa OUEDRAOGO wrote:
I am busy right now with cpstrnew.
Yeah ! Great !
Can you say anything about the state of same ?
Thanks a lot
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepa
On 17/05/2011 12:19, Joerg Schuelke wrote:
Am Mon, 16 May 2011 15:35:24 +0100
schrieb Martin:
{$EXPAND ProcFoo(1)}
// the code in thr try finally block
{$EXPAND ProcFooEnd}
I can see that happen very easy?
And there we are, Pascal would be down to where C is now.
There is no answer for that,
Am Mon, 16 May 2011 15:35:24 +0100
schrieb Martin :
> {$EXPAND ProcFoo(1)}
> // the code in thr try finally block
> {$EXPAND ProcFooEnd}
>
> I can see that happen very easy?
> And there we are, Pascal would be down to where C is now.
There is no answer for that, you know. But you can always deci
2011/5/17 Michael Van Canneyt
>
>
> On Tue, 17 May 2011, Inoussa OUEDRAOGO wrote:
>
> I've committed simple HTTP server (threaded or not) and HTTP Client
>>> components to FCL-Web. They work using the fcl-net ssockets unit. (for
>>> which
>>> a fix has been committed as well). Both use blocking
On 05/17/2011 01:10 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Will you look at it, or would you like me to do it ?
It would be just great if an example project would come with the components.
Thanks a lot !
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.fr
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Inoussa OUEDRAOGO wrote:
I've committed simple HTTP server (threaded or not) and HTTP Client
components to FCL-Web. They work using the fcl-net ssockets unit. (for which
a fix has been committed as well). Both use blocking sockets.
Great news ! It should be now possible
Am Mon, 16 May 2011 13:01:39 +0300
schrieb ik :
> Why not to create something like:
>
> *macro* Macro_Name(Param)
> *begin*
> *end*;
>
> The Pascal way ? It's more readable. But then what do you gain with
> that Macro ?
-Doing it this way would not be acceptable by any developer, therefor
tact
> I've committed simple HTTP server (threaded or not) and HTTP Client
> components to FCL-Web. They work using the fcl-net ssockets unit. (for which
> a fix has been committed as well). Both use blocking sockets.
>
Great news ! It should be now possible to develop a WST "web service" http
server a
19 matches
Mail list logo
