Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote on Wed, 05 Sep 2012:
Thanks Jonas, noted. I'm going to step back a little and build a
clean 2.6.0 from an fpcbuild .zip, build a Lazarus 1.0, and then see
how many issues still give obvious problems. Mantis suggests that
the issues I reported in the latter part of l
Jonas Maebe wrote:
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote on Wed, 05 Sep 2012:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Is there a specific revision number that is known to be OK for this?
I'm trying to do notes for somebody off-list, and there's a
code-generation patch in 2.6.1 that's needed for SPARC.
Mattias already
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote on Wed, 05 Sep 2012:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Is there a specific revision number that is known to be OK for
this? I'm trying to do notes for somebody off-list, and there's a
code-generation patch in 2.6.1 that's needed for SPARC.
Mattias already answered that. T
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Is there a specific revision number that is known to be OK for this? I'm
trying to do notes for somebody off-list, and there's a code-generation
patch in 2.6.1 that's needed for SPARC.
Mattias already answered that. The last two days 100+ revs were merged,
mostly fpd
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said:
> Referring to http://www.freepascal.org/develop.var is there a reason why
> the "Fixes to 2.6.x" section gives a URI for fixes_2_2 ?
Take your pick:
1. it is just an example
2. lazy webadmins
3. it is fixed in svn
> Is there a specific revision n
Mark Morgan Lloyd hat am 5. September 2012
um 11:38 geschrieben:
> Referring to http://www.freepascal.org/develop.var is there a reason why
> the "Fixes to 2.6.x" section gives a URI for fixes_2_2 ?
>
> What's correct in this context- branches/fixes_2_6/ or
> branches/fixes_2_6_0/ ?
fixes_2_6
S
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Martin said:
function RunCommand(const cmdline:string;var
outputstring:string):boolean; deprecated;
Sorry seen to late, it is deprecated...
Seems that FPC is missing the functionality for "commandline" (which is
a prope
In our previous episode, Martin said:
> > function RunCommand(const cmdline:string;var
> > outputstring:string):boolean; deprecated;
>
> Sorry seen to late, it is deprecated...
>
> Seems that FPC is missing the functionality for "commandline" (which is
> a property that existed for very long).
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Martin wrote:
On 05/09/2012 10:38, Martin wrote:
function RunCommand(const cmdline:string;var outputstring:string):boolean;
deprecated;
Sorry seen to late, it is deprecated...
Seems that FPC is missing the functionality for "commandline" (which is a
property that exi
On 05/09/2012 10:38, Martin wrote:
function RunCommand(const cmdline:string;var
outputstring:string):boolean; deprecated;
Sorry seen to late, it is deprecated...
Seems that FPC is missing the functionality for "commandline" (which is
a property that existed for very long). Seen that it is n
In our previous episode, Martin said:
> > On non-windows, each element in the params list is passed as-is in the
> > argv
> > array; No changes are performed at all.
>
> FPC itself supplies a function
>
> function RunCommand(const cmdline:string;var
> outputstring:string):boolean; deprecated;
>
On 05/09/2012 09:55, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On non-windows, each element in the params list is passed as-is in the
argv
array; No changes are performed at all.
FPC itself supplies a function
function RunCommand(const cmdline:string;var
outputstring:string):boolean; deprecated;
Referring to http://www.freepascal.org/develop.var is there a reason why
the "Fixes to 2.6.x" section gives a URI for fixes_2_2 ?
What's correct in this context- branches/fixes_2_6/ or
branches/fixes_2_6_0/ ?
I'm trying to find a 2.6.1 that will compile Lazarus 1.0. Yesterday's
daily snapsho
On 05/09/2012 09:55, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On non-windows, each element in the params list is passed as-is in the
argv
array; No changes are performed at all.
Does FPC offer a utility function to break a "shell style" commandline
into the correct arguments?
--foo=abc --bar="
michael.vancanneyt wrote on Wed, 05 Sep 2012:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Martin wrote:
I know TProcess changed from a single command-line to a listof
arguments. So I couldn't find the User Changes note for this.
You don't need the 'User changes'. It is documented. Press F1.
Well, one of the rea
On 05/09/12 09:55, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
I know TProcess changed from a single command-line to a listof
arguments. So I couldn't find the User Changes note for this.
You don't need the 'User changes'. It is documented. Press F1.
Which reminds me... I sent a process.xml patch to M
In our previous episode, Martin said:
> That is not always possible. And the quotes work on most platforms.
Define "platform" in the context of execution. Both API and shell?
> An application may however have a list of arguments in a single string
> (e.g. the IDE ask the user to specify extra a
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Martin wrote:
From http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=22801
You should not pass quotes. The quotes are only needed in a shell.
That is not always possible. And the quotes work on most platforms.
Windows is a
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Martin wrote:
From http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=22801
You should not pass quotes. The quotes are only needed in a shell.
That is not always possible. And the quotes work on most platforms.
Windows is an exception (as usual). See below.
I know TProcess chan
For reference http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=22751
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
From http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=22801
You should not pass quotes. The quotes are only needed in a shell.
That is not always possible. And the quotes work on most platforms.
I know TProcess changed from a single command-line to a listof
arguments. So I couldn't find the User Change
21 matches
Mail list logo
