Am 18.12.2012 19:17, schrieb Vincent Snijders:
> 2012/12/18 Florian Klämpfl :
>> Am 17.12.2012 10:36, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Any FPC developer willing to comment on the status of some of these
>>> issues (that have been years overdue)?
>>
>> It narrows basically down to the fact
2012/12/18 Florian Klämpfl :
> Am 17.12.2012 10:36, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Any FPC developer willing to comment on the status of some of these
>> issues (that have been years overdue)?
>
> It narrows basically down to the fact that fpc lacks developers and
> contributors, or do I m
Am 17.12.2012 10:36, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
> Hi,
>
> Any FPC developer willing to comment on the status of some of these
> issues (that have been years overdue)?
It narrows basically down to the fact that fpc lacks developers and
contributors, or do I miss something?
>
> Original
Am 18.12.2012 17:47 schrieb "Thomas Schatzl" :
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 17:35 +0100, Sven Barth wrote:
> > > === objdump end ===
> > >
> > > The first one shouldn't be the full pathname... also isn't the linker
> > > on Android called "/system/bin/linker"?
>
> You're trying to generate an
Hi,
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 17:35 +0100, Sven Barth wrote:
> > === objdump end ===
> >
> > The first one shouldn't be the full pathname... also isn't the linker
> > on Android called "/system/bin/linker"?
You're trying to generate an executable or a shared library (.so)?
> >
> > Do I need any fur
Am 18.12.2012 17:24, schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 18.12.2012 14:22, schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 18.12.2012 14:15, schrieb Thomas Schatzl:
I now simply replaced my 2.6.0 fpcmake with one compiled from the
Android branch and were happy to go :)
So I (this time on Windows) managed to compile and install t
Am 18.12.2012 14:22, schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 18.12.2012 14:15, schrieb Thomas Schatzl:
I now simply replaced my 2.6.0 fpcmake with one compiled from the
Android branch and were happy to go :)
So I (this time on Windows) managed to compile and install the branch
and now just need to check wheth
Am 18.12.2012 15:00, schrieb Dimitri Smits:
As Sven wrote, I guess the FPC community needs to think about this. XE2 already
supported MacOS X (but through fpc). Haven't checked the OS-X in XE3 though.
Only iOS was done through FPC. Mac OS X itself was already done through
Embarcadero's compiler
As Sven wrote, I guess the FPC community needs to think about this. XE2 already
supported MacOS X (but through fpc). Haven't checked the OS-X in XE3 though.
As for the multi-platform: they are rewriting their compiler to be a front for
llvm. Probably they will make a few code-generators and opt
Am 18.12.2012 14:47, schrieb Anton Kavalenka:
On 15.12.2012 21:35, Martin wrote:
I am trying to figure out how to do that, or what I do wrong. I found
a page about $codepage, but it did not help
http://wiki.freepascal.org/LCL_Unicode_Support
I didnt find the fpc specific page, if exists (I sus
On 15.12.2012 21:35, Martin wrote:
I am trying to figure out how to do that, or what I do wrong. I found
a page about $codepage, but it did not help
http://wiki.freepascal.org/LCL_Unicode_Support
I didnt find the fpc specific page, if exists (I suspect it does)
I am calling a function "functi
On 18/12/12 13:26, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> They could deliver ppu's and .o's.
True, but widely untested. As a previous conversation from a few month
back ended... it should work in theory.
Also Lazarus Packages are designed to work with source only. There is no
option to install .ppu's an
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
> > IMHO Delphi-like IDE (design-time) packages are not useful in Lazarus,
> > as adding a source package and recompiling does the trick just as well.
>
> Tell that to component developers and companies like Devx, TMS etc! With
> the current way th
Am 18.12.2012 14:15, schrieb Thomas Schatzl:
I now simply replaced my 2.6.0 fpcmake with one compiled from the
Android branch and were happy to go :)
So I (this time on Windows) managed to compile and install the branch
and now just need to check whether it will work...
Now I just need to tes
Am 18.12.2012 13:19, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 12/17/2012 03:44 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Probably not even implemented, because Delphi IDE is Windows only -
and there are no plans to make a cross-platform IDE by Embarcadero.
Regards, - Graeme -
IMHO Delphi-like IDE (design-time) packag
Hi,
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 13:48 +0100, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 18.12.2012 11:09, schrieb Thomas Schatzl:
> >
> >> > There is a new issue I have never seen before that fpdoc
> >> > (actually
> >> > cwstring) now wants to link with libiconv which is not
> >> > available on
> >> > Android (you
On 18/12/12 12:19, Michael Schnell wrote:
>
> IMHO Delphi-like IDE (design-time) packages are not useful in Lazarus,
> as adding a source package and recompiling does the trick just as well.
Tell that to component developers and companies like Devx, TMS etc! With
the current way things work, the
Am 18.12.2012 11:09, schrieb Thomas Schatzl:
> There is a new issue I have never seen before that fpdoc (actually
> cwstring) now wants to link with libiconv which is not available on
> Android (you can build it yourselves though). Simply excluding it from
> the android build would fix
On 12/17/2012 04:29 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
From what I see so far of the route that Embarcadero takes (complete
reimplementation of compiler, sudden appearence of "type helpers" and
things like "zero based strings") I predict that we'll reach a point
in the near(!) future where we won't (be able
On 12/17/2012 03:55 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
No. We need to think about this ourselves as we support more targets
than Delphi ever will support.
Even cross-platform runtime packages might make sense (e.g. linking a
native "plugin" package to an Android/Java Program)
Something I could (suppose
On 12/17/2012 03:44 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Probably not even implemented, because Delphi IDE is Windows only -
and there are no plans to make a cross-platform IDE by Embarcadero.
Regards, - Graeme -
IMHO Delphi-like IDE (design-time) packages are not useful in Lazarus,
as adding a sour
Hi,
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 07:30 +0100, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 18.12.2012 00:10, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 21:45 +0100, Sven Barth wrote:
> >> I'm currently testing the Android branch and I've already reached a
> >> problem when trying to build it. I've downlo
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
This is why I decided to diversify, and why I will once again turn my
attention to Java (not
JavaScript-that-is-the-assembly-language-of-the-internet). Java seems
the sensible route to go, for long term employment. There is a very
healthy Java industry (stacks of jobs),
23 matches
Mail list logo
