On 31.05.2016 7:59, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Ondrej Pokorny said:
Could you please include http://mantis.freepascal.org/view.php?id=28578
(r31434) into 3.0.2 as well? (Or confirm that it won't be merged.)
Done.
Thank you!
Ondrej
_
Am 30.05.2016 12:43 schrieb "Dejan Boras" :
>
> Is there a chance to merge the fix for #29321 as well in 3.0.2? Last time
I tested 3.0.1 (few days ago), this wasn't included. Not really in an
environment now where I can test it again.
@Marco: you can go ahead and merge the corresponding revision.
In our previous episode, Ondrej Pokorny said:
> > well?
>
> Could you please include http://mantis.freepascal.org/view.php?id=28578
> (r31434) into 3.0.2 as well? (Or confirm that it won't be merged.)
Done.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.fr
It's not a big change for #29321, from what I see in the svn diff for
r32845. If not, I can always patch fpc myself.
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:27 PM, tha...@thaddy.com
wrote:
> It says fixed in 3.1.1. It doesn't say it would be back-ported, but indeed
> you can request it.
> And indeed in this c
2015-10-10 21:12 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth :
>
> "@@" (though I have to admit that I don't know where you got that @@ from;
> was that introduced in Delphi recently?)).
>
> It's not an easy topic and I'd really welcome the input of other core
> developers...
>
Somehow I forgot to answer...
@@ is old
On 20.05.2016 11:21, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
On 12.04.2016 9:22, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I also think so, we've already been merging the necessary fixes to
fixes_3_x
Could you please include
http://mantis.freepascal.org/view.php?id=28578 (r31434) into 3.0.2 as
well?
Could you please incl
On Mon, 30 May 2016, Maciej Izak wrote:
2016-05-30 15:40 GMT+02:00 Michael Van Canneyt :
This is not an argument.
Yes this is not an argument but reality. It blocks a lot of code.
Certainly.
I suffer from it myself from time to time, but such is life...
Expecting some kind of timeline
2016-05-30 15:40 GMT+02:00 Michael Van Canneyt :
> This is not an argument.
>
Yes this is not an argument but reality. It blocks a lot of code.
> I will repeat: FPC is and remains a hobby project for the core team.
>
Nothing new: most of 3rd contributions for FPC/Lazarus stuff is produced as
h
On Mon, 30 May 2016, Maciej Izak wrote:
2016-05-30 14:41 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth :
Let me first finish the packages stuff as that will lead to a breaking
change in the RTTI binary format (PPTypeInfo instead of PTypeInfo,
necessary due to Windows' PE format) and I don't want to add any new RTTI
2016-05-30 14:41 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth :
> Let me first finish the packages stuff as that will lead to a breaking
> change in the RTTI binary format (PPTypeInfo instead of PTypeInfo,
> necessary due to Windows' PE format) and I don't want to add any new RTTI
> stuff before this is dealt with.
>
I d
Am 30.05.2016 14:07 schrieb "Michael Van Canneyt" :
>
>
>
> On Mon, 30 May 2016, tha...@thaddy.com wrote:
>
>> New feature. Belongs in 3.1.1.
>
>
> And the implementation is contested, which is the reason why it doesn't
get
> merged to trunk.
It's less the binary/RTTI format (which is what the bra
Am 30.05.2016 11:58 schrieb "Maciej Izak" :
>
> 2016-05-30 11:29 GMT+02:00 Marco van de Voort :
>>
>> In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
>> > > Is possible to add r31911 to 3.0.2?
>> > >
>> > > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=29045
>> >
>> > It can't be merged as is, but I've provided
On Mon, 30 May 2016, tha...@thaddy.com wrote:
New feature. Belongs in 3.1.1.
And the implementation is contested, which is the reason why it doesn't get
merged to trunk.
Michael.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lis
New feature. Belongs in 3.1.1.
On 30-May-16 12:38 PM, Alfred wrote:
I would like to support the inclusion of interface RTTI.
Included a patch for this !
Thanks.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi
It says fixed in 3.1.1. It doesn't say it would be back-ported, but
indeed you can request it.
And indeed in this case I support your request. (Since it was an
oversight in the first place?)
I have no clue if this is easy to do, but I think it is warranted.
Regards,
Thaddy
On 30-May-16 12:42
Is there a chance to merge the fix for #29321 as well in 3.0.2? Last time I
tested 3.0.1 (few days ago), this wasn't included. Not really in an
environment now where I can test it again.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lis
I would like to support the inclusion of interface RTTI.
Included a patch for this !
Thanks.
fpc300rtti.patch
Description: Binary data
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-d
2016-05-30 11:29 GMT+02:00 Marco van de Voort :
> In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
> > > Is possible to add r31911 to 3.0.2?
> > >
> > > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=29045
> >
> > It can't be merged as is, but I've provided Marco with a custom patch.
>
> Done.
Sven & Marco - T
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
> > Is possible to add r31911 to 3.0.2?
> >
> > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=29045
>
> It can't be merged as is, but I've provided Marco with a custom patch.
Done.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@
Am 29.05.2016 16:02 schrieb "Maciej Izak" :
>
> 2016-04-11 15:27 GMT+02:00 Ondrej Pokorny :
>>
>> What are the plans on releasing 3.0.2?
>
>
> Is possible to add r31911 to 3.0.2?
>
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=29045
It can't be merged as is, but I've provided Marco with a custom patch.
20 matches
Mail list logo
