Re: [fpc-devel] type discussion

2005-06-02 Thread Angelo Bertolli
the C-style operators += etc. should better be written as +:= since C has = as assignment, Pascal has := as assignment symbol := means assign to, += means add to etc., I cannot find any inconsistency here. Also, += and such were created to make it easier to convert C code. If you

[fpc-devel] Extend the libraries people!

2005-06-02 Thread Angelo Bertolli
What makes python interesting are the many classes it offers by default to perform standard tasks, especially in the text treatment department; regular expression stuff etc. The same goes for most languages; Mostly it's not the language syntax that determines the productivity factor; it's the

[fpc-devel] Re: [fpc-l] type discussion

2005-06-02 Thread Angelo Bertolli
What matters is designing und understanding the code, not writing it. I spend less than 10% of my time at work in actually _writing_ code, so even if someone can type in his/her code twice as fast, the maximum (s)he would gain would be five percent in overall performance. you are missing

Re: [fpc-devel] type discussion

2005-06-02 Thread Angelo Bertolli
Well pascal in the only mainstream langugae that does that - I dont see the pont and it aint magic. Jamie, now I KNOW I don't understand where you're coming from Pascal? Mainstream? ;) ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org

[fpc-devel] Re: [fpc-l] type discussion

2005-06-02 Thread Angelo Bertolli
Forward declarations are redundant - they exist purely for the benefit of the compiler. I agree. I hate prototyping. That's why you use top-down design. What's wrong with that? Begin..End is redundant - you have to indent them to make em readable anyways. Not at all; I certainly

Re: [fpc-devel] WTF? Type checking dependent on compilation mode!?

2005-04-26 Thread Angelo Bertolli
I usually don't say anything, but I wanted to throw my opinion on this as well. This is important to me as someone who likes Pascal as a learning tool (teaching tool), and as a language which adheres to certain ideals. I use FPC in standard mode--is it still going to let me mix types like

Re: [fpc-devel]Recompile the RTL to trace bugs

2004-05-03 Thread Angelo Bertolli
It is also not possible to use new features in the compiler. The compiler needs to be able to be compiled with 1.0.x for bootstrapping. This may be a dumb question but, can you explain what you mean by this, and why this is not possible? ___

Re: [fpc-devel]sdlgraph

2004-02-20 Thread Angelo Bertolli
I have had an interest in creating an sdlgraph unit for a while, and have been planning for a few months. I didn't really know that there was other talk about this, although I suspected it. So today, I looked around and saw some interest, and this listed as a project. I am starting