[fpc-devel] InstantFPC

2011-07-11 Thread dhkblaszyk
ZeelandNet Webmail I would like to create a patch for instantfpc but would like to ask first here. The patch will add a new extension (.ppx) to instantfpc and the installers so it get's registered with the OS after installing. Is this ok with everybody? Darius

Re: [fpc-devel] Fppkg questions

2011-05-22 Thread dhkblaszyk
The idea at the time was to have a different fppkg configuration for each repository, not to have everything in 1 configuration. I assume that you want something like apt-get, where there is a file with known repositories, and that fppkg scans all repositories. I suppose that may be easier. If

Re: [fpc-devel] fppkg question

2011-05-10 Thread dhkblaszyk
On Tue, 10 May 2011 08:30:28 +0200 (CEST), Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote: On Tue, 10 May 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote: Hi, I've created a trivial front end for fppkg (see lazarus mailing list) but working on this I realized that they are not grouped in any way. Currently

Re: [fpc-devel] helper feature finished

2011-04-05 Thread dhkblaszyk
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:17:48 +0200, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 05.04.2011 04:27, schrieb Paul Ishenin: 05.04.2011 3:51, Sven Barth wrote: Both class helpers and record helpers are implemented and work as Delphi compatible as reasonably possible. Congratulations.

Re: [fpc-devel] The future of fpmake

2011-03-31 Thread dhkblaszyk
Thisnfeature is already there. When you use fpmake directly: -f, if you use fppkg (what I would recommend): fppkg -c. Thanks, I will have a look how it works. I'll try to document it on the wiki. On the side, fppkg is only for FPC right? So not useful for standalone projects. Darius

[fpc-devel] Added new target to fpmake

2010-11-25 Thread dhkblaszyk
ZeelandNet Webmail Hi, Today I was playing with FPDoc and I decided to add creating the documents as a target to fpmake which seems logical to me. I only did a very basic implementation to show tghe principle so someone (Joost / Michael??) can shoot at it first before I burn too much time

Re: [fpc-devel] Added new target to fpmake

2010-11-25 Thread dhkblaszyk
I think it is a good and valuable idea. Do you have any plans to add more functionality to it ? I was thinking about adding a few more helper functions, such as adding documentation for whole directories at a time. Also the documentation output should be possible to be set, currently it's in

Re: [fpc-devel] Added new target to fpmake

2010-11-25 Thread dhkblaszyk
I think it is a good and valuable idea. Do you have any plans to add more functionality to it ? I was thinking about adding a few more helper functions, such as adding documentation for whole directories at a time. Also the documentation output should be possible to be set, currently it's in

Re: [fpc-devel] fpmkunit

2007-11-13 Thread dhkblaszyk
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:28:47 +0100 (CET) Peter Vreman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:21:36 +0100 (CET) Peter Vreman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] fpc -n -FUunits\i386-win32\ -Fu..\..\src\ -Fuunits\i386-win32\* myexample.pp 1. What strikes me is that the

Re: [fpc-devel] patch fpmkunit

2007-08-21 Thread dhkblaszyk
Jonas Maebe schreef: On 20 Aug 2007, at 09:27, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: - implemented archiving to zip using TZipper (only when no user assigned ArchiveFilesProc, because that overrides the command) The snapshots were broken last night: /FPC/home/fpc/snapshot/fpc-2.1/compiler/ppc386

Re: [fpc-devel] paszlib patch

2007-06-12 Thread dhkblaszyk
The patch needs some reconsideration. zip.pas (perhaps other units I added also?) have a dependency on zlib. But zlib is in packages/extra and not packages/base like paszlib. Does that mean that zip.pas cannot reside at base/paszlib? Probably yes, unless I remove the dep (if possible). Or should