On 27/04/2019 23:17, Григорий Параскевов via fpc-devel wrote:
command line tools are already installed, use "Software Update" to
install updates", но при очередной попытке
установить fpc-3.0.4.intel.macosx выходит сообщение "you have to install
Xcode and its command line tools before
Здравствуйте! Я не могу установить Лазарю на свой Мак. После того, как скачиваю
fpc-3.0.4.intel.macosx и в терминал ввожу xcode-select ---install, пишет "
command line tools are already installed, use "Software Update" to install
updates", но при очередной попытке установить
DIFF attached for comment and review. Provides the following features /
difference:
1) Switched operation of cpuinfo.pas - there is still a SET containing the ct_
constants, but that now indexes an array of structures rather than a
collection
of arrays. The array contains the info from
--
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 -
sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1:
-Skload fpcylix unit
what is it for?
Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers
for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal system/sysutils
unit.
___
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1:
-Skload fpcylix unit
what is it for?
Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers
for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal system/sysutils
unit.
Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1:
-Skload fpcylix unit
what is it for?
Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers
for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal
system/sysutils
unit.
where can i find it ?
~/fpc find . -name 'fpcylix.pp'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1:
-Skload fpcylix unit
what is it for?
Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers
for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal
system/sysutils
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1:
-Skload fpcylix unit
what is it for?
Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers
for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal
system/sysutils
unit.
BTW, looking at the
Tomas Hajny wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1:
-Skload fpcylix unit
what is it for?
Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers
for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal
system/sysutils
unit.
BTW,
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers
for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal system/sysutils
unit.
Is FPC able to compile Kylix forms (*.xfm) now?
Forms are something of a higher level than FPC. They are
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1:
-Skload fpcylix unit
what is it for?
Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers
for Kylix compat that we _really_
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1:
-Skload fpcylix unit
what is it for?
Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers
for Kylix compat
How I can aligh data in FPC like in C?
struct __declspec(align(16)) VECTOR4F
{
float x;
float y;
float z;
float w;
};
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Will be an SSE3 for assembler support?
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Ростислав Окулов wrote:
Ростислав Окулов wrote:
How I can aligh data in FPC like in C?
struct __declspec(align(16)) VECTOR4F
{
float x;
float y;
float z;
float w;
};
FPC can align local data only up to 4 byte boundaries. Aligning to 16 byte
boundaries done by the compiler
Hint: fpc-1.9.7.i386-win32.exe 8/2/2005 is corrupt!
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:04:10 +0100 (CET), Ladislav Lacina wrote
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:31:41 +0100
From: Tomas Hajny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] The new 1.9.6 release
To: FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content
the new directory structure has broken something!?
D:\Lazarusmake
process_begin: CreateProcess((null), ppc386.exe -iVSPTPSOTO, ...) failed.
process_begin: CreateProcess((null), ppc386.exe -iSP, ...) failed.
process_begin: CreateProcess((null), ppc386.exe -iTP, ...) failed.
process_begin:
the new directory structure has broken something!?
D:\Lazarusmake
process_begin: CreateProcess((null), ppc386.exe -iVSPTPSOTO, ...) failed.
process_begin: CreateProcess((null), ppc386.exe -iSP, ...) failed.
process_begin: CreateProcess((null), ppc386.exe -iTP, ...) failed.
process_begin:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got the latest lazarus and fpc snap. The message comes since the new
directories are being introduces
e.g. win32 -- i386-win32
just noticed this dir change myself, i'm assuming that it should be ok
to copy the non-updated files from the old bin dir to the new one?
--
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is there no daily binary snapshot at
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/v11/win32-i386/ ???
Latest files are marked with 14/12/03.
It probably means that the build fails for some reason.
Michael.
Why is there no daily binary snapshot at
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/v11/win32-i386/ ???
Latest files are marked with 14/12/03.
___
fpc-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Am Fre, 2003-04-04 um 09.40 schrieb Jeff Pohlmeyer:
Patch for /fpc/fcl/passrc/pscanner.pp
so it will recognize '', '', and ''
- Not sure why these were omitted, maybe it has
something to do with fpdoc's tag generation?
No, as Michael said, it's just because until now it only scans
Patch for /fpc/fcl/passrc/pscanner.pp
so it will recognize '', '', and ''
- Not sure why these were omitted, maybe it has
something to do with fpdoc's tag generation?
[PATCH]
--- pscanner.oldThu Mar 27 10:32:48 2003
+++ pscanner.newThu Apr 3 23:48:57 2003
@@ -51,7 +51,9 @@
25 matches
Mail list logo
