Am 08.06.2016 20:41 schrieb "Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis" <
d.ioanni...@nephelae.eu>:
>
> Στις 2016-05-30 15:43, Sven Barth έγραψε:
>>
>> Am 30.05.2016 14:07 schrieb "Michael Van Canneyt"
>> :
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, 30 May 2016, tha...@thaddy.com wrote:
>> >
>> >>
2016-06-08 15:40 GMT-03:00 Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis :
> I know that I'm probably late, but ...
>
> Sven,
>
> currently fpc is ahead of Delphi in Linux platform but this will
> probably change ( if this time, they keep their Road Map that is) .
>
> Plz, think again
Στις 2016-05-30 15:43, Sven Barth έγραψε:
Am 30.05.2016 14:07 schrieb "Michael Van Canneyt"
:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 30 May 2016, tha...@thaddy.com wrote:
>
>> New feature. Belongs in 3.1.1.
>
>
> And the implementation is contested, which is the reason why it
doesn't
Hi.
Could revision 32125 please be merged. Without it mode iso would still be
broken. See http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=28862
Thanks - MiSchi.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Thank you very much :)
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:24 AM Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
> > @Marco: you can go ahead and merge the corresponding revision. It's a
> > bugfix after all...
>
> Done.
>
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
> @Marco: you can go ahead and merge the corresponding revision. It's a
> bugfix after all...
Done.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
On 31.05.2016 7:59, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Ondrej Pokorny said:
Could you please include http://mantis.freepascal.org/view.php?id=28578
(r31434) into 3.0.2 as well? (Or confirm that it won't be merged.)
Done.
Thank you!
Ondrej
Am 30.05.2016 12:43 schrieb "Dejan Boras" :
>
> Is there a chance to merge the fix for #29321 as well in 3.0.2? Last time
I tested 3.0.1 (few days ago), this wasn't included. Not really in an
environment now where I can test it again.
@Marco: you can go ahead and merge the
In our previous episode, Ondrej Pokorny said:
> > well?
>
> Could you please include http://mantis.freepascal.org/view.php?id=28578
> (r31434) into 3.0.2 as well? (Or confirm that it won't be merged.)
Done.
___
fpc-devel maillist -
It's not a big change for #29321, from what I see in the svn diff for
r32845. If not, I can always patch fpc myself.
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:27 PM, tha...@thaddy.com
wrote:
> It says fixed in 3.1.1. It doesn't say it would be back-ported, but indeed
> you can request it.
>
On 20.05.2016 11:21, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
On 12.04.2016 9:22, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I also think so, we've already been merging the necessary fixes to
fixes_3_x
Could you please include
http://mantis.freepascal.org/view.php?id=28578 (r31434) into 3.0.2 as
well?
Could you please
On Mon, 30 May 2016, Maciej Izak wrote:
2016-05-30 15:40 GMT+02:00 Michael Van Canneyt :
This is not an argument.
Yes this is not an argument but reality. It blocks a lot of code.
Certainly.
I suffer from it myself from time to time, but such is life...
On Mon, 30 May 2016, Maciej Izak wrote:
2016-05-30 14:41 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth :
Let me first finish the packages stuff as that will lead to a breaking
change in the RTTI binary format (PPTypeInfo instead of PTypeInfo,
necessary due to Windows' PE format) and I
2016-05-30 14:41 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth :
> Let me first finish the packages stuff as that will lead to a breaking
> change in the RTTI binary format (PPTypeInfo instead of PTypeInfo,
> necessary due to Windows' PE format) and I don't want to add any new RTTI
> stuff
Am 30.05.2016 11:58 schrieb "Maciej Izak" :
>
> 2016-05-30 11:29 GMT+02:00 Marco van de Voort :
>>
>> In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
>> > > Is possible to add r31911 to 3.0.2?
>> > >
>> > > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=29045
>> >
>> > It
On Mon, 30 May 2016, tha...@thaddy.com wrote:
New feature. Belongs in 3.1.1.
And the implementation is contested, which is the reason why it doesn't get
merged to trunk.
Michael.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
New feature. Belongs in 3.1.1.
On 30-May-16 12:38 PM, Alfred wrote:
I would like to support the inclusion of interface RTTI.
Included a patch for this !
Thanks.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
It says fixed in 3.1.1. It doesn't say it would be back-ported, but
indeed you can request it.
And indeed in this case I support your request. (Since it was an
oversight in the first place?)
I have no clue if this is easy to do, but I think it is warranted.
Regards,
Thaddy
On 30-May-16 12:42
Is there a chance to merge the fix for #29321 as well in 3.0.2? Last time I
tested 3.0.1 (few days ago), this wasn't included. Not really in an
environment now where I can test it again.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
I would like to support the inclusion of interface RTTI.
Included a patch for this !
Thanks.
fpc300rtti.patch
Description: Binary data
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
2016-05-30 11:29 GMT+02:00 Marco van de Voort :
> In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
> > > Is possible to add r31911 to 3.0.2?
> > >
> > > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=29045
> >
> > It can't be merged as is, but I've provided Marco with a custom patch.
>
> Done.
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
> > Is possible to add r31911 to 3.0.2?
> >
> > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=29045
>
> It can't be merged as is, but I've provided Marco with a custom patch.
Done.
___
fpc-devel maillist -
Am 29.05.2016 16:02 schrieb "Maciej Izak" :
>
> 2016-04-11 15:27 GMT+02:00 Ondrej Pokorny :
>>
>> What are the plans on releasing 3.0.2?
>
>
> Is possible to add r31911 to 3.0.2?
>
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=29045
It can't be merged as is, but
About 3.0.2, it may be the occasion to merge the interface RTTI branch
to the trunk.
Alfred managed to make mORMot's interface invoke and stubbing in Linux
x64, ARM 32 and AARCH64 platforms!
In addition to existing Win32, Win64 and Linux x86, we now cover a lot
of platforms.
See
2016-04-11 15:27 GMT+02:00 Ondrej Pokorny :
> What are the plans on releasing 3.0.2?
>
Is possible to add r31911 to 3.0.2?
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=29045
--
Best regards,
Maciej Izak
___
fpc-devel maillist -
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
> We're set to create the branch at the end of May, which is about now.
> The last merges have been performed. I assume Marco will tag somewhere this
> week, and then building starts.
That is good news! Thanks.
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> > Do you have a merge list on the net somewhere (like Lazarus has:
> > http://wiki.freepascal.org/Lazarus_1.6_fixes_branch ) or do I have to check
> > the SVN merge info manually to see what has been merged?
>
> Marco maintains a merge list,
On Sun, 29 May 2016, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
On 29.05.2016 10:33, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
We're set to create the branch at the end of May, which is about now.
The last merges have been performed. I assume Marco will tag somewhere this
week, and then building starts.
Great!
Do you have a
On 29.05.2016 10:33, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
We're set to create the branch at the end of May, which is about now.
The last merges have been performed. I assume Marco will tag somewhere
this
week, and then building starts.
Great!
Do you have a merge list on the net somewhere (like
On Sun, 29 May 2016, Juha Manninen wrote:
Is there any estimate for FPC 3.0.2 release?
FPC 3.0.0 was released already at November 26, over half a year ago.
Fixes branches of both FPC and Lazarus have lots of important commits.
Lazarus 1.6.2 + FPC 3.0.2 would make a nice and solid combination.
Is there any estimate for FPC 3.0.2 release?
FPC 3.0.0 was released already at November 26, over half a year ago.
Fixes branches of both FPC and Lazarus have lots of important commits.
Lazarus 1.6.2 + FPC 3.0.2 would make a nice and solid combination.
Juha
On 12.04.2016 9:22, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I also think so, we've already been merging the necessary fixes to
fixes_3_x
Could you please include http://mantis.freepascal.org/view.php?id=28578
(r31434) into 3.0.2 as well?
Ondrej
___
fpc-devel
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 22:15:53 +0400, Dejan Boras
wrote:
Would it be possible to include bug #29321 fix in 3.0.2? as this solves
my
problems with array helpers.
And #27349, please.
--
Kazantsev Alexey
___
fpc-devel
Would it be possible to include bug #29321 fix in 3.0.2? as this solves my
problems with array helpers.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
2016-04-12 5:03 GMT-03:00 Marco van de Voort :
> In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> >
> > I also think so, we've already been merging the necessary fixes to
> > fixes_3_x
>
> For people that missed this hint: PLEASE retest your issues with the fixes
>
Fixes
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
>
> I also think so, we've already been merging the necessary fixes to
> fixes_3_x
For people that missed this hint: PLEASE retest your issues with the fixes
branch (3.0.1), specially if your problems were mostly library in nature.
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
What are the plans on releasing 3.0.2?
We'd like to release Lazarus 1.6.2 - it would be good if it was released with
FPC 3.0.2 because of the Currency bug.
I also think so, we've already been merging the necessary fixes to fixes_3_x
Now we need
What are the plans on releasing 3.0.2?
We'd like to release Lazarus 1.6.2 - it would be good if it was released
with FPC 3.0.2 because of the Currency bug.
Ondrej
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
38 matches
Mail list logo