Jonas Maebe wrote:
Unfortunately, mantis is seldom updated when changes are merged back
these days. I used to do that for all changes merged back by anyone, but
it's become too much work (and it's also much more work to figure out
this information afterwards compared to immediately updating ma
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote on Wed, 05 Sep 2012:
Thanks Jonas, noted. I'm going to step back a little and build a
clean 2.6.0 from an fpcbuild .zip, build a Lazarus 1.0, and then see
how many issues still give obvious problems. Mantis suggests that
the issues I reported in the latter part of l
Jonas Maebe wrote:
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote on Wed, 05 Sep 2012:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Is there a specific revision number that is known to be OK for this?
I'm trying to do notes for somebody off-list, and there's a
code-generation patch in 2.6.1 that's needed for SPARC.
Mattias already
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote on Wed, 05 Sep 2012:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Is there a specific revision number that is known to be OK for
this? I'm trying to do notes for somebody off-list, and there's a
code-generation patch in 2.6.1 that's needed for SPARC.
Mattias already answered that. T
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Is there a specific revision number that is known to be OK for this? I'm
trying to do notes for somebody off-list, and there's a code-generation
patch in 2.6.1 that's needed for SPARC.
Mattias already answered that. The last two days 100+ revs were merged,
mostly fpd
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said:
> Referring to http://www.freepascal.org/develop.var is there a reason why
> the "Fixes to 2.6.x" section gives a URI for fixes_2_2 ?
Take your pick:
1. it is just an example
2. lazy webadmins
3. it is fixed in svn
> Is there a specific revision n
Mark Morgan Lloyd hat am 5. September 2012
um 11:38 geschrieben:
> Referring to http://www.freepascal.org/develop.var is there a reason why
> the "Fixes to 2.6.x" section gives a URI for fixes_2_2 ?
>
> What's correct in this context- branches/fixes_2_6/ or
> branches/fixes_2_6_0/ ?
fixes_2_6
S
Referring to http://www.freepascal.org/develop.var is there a reason why
the "Fixes to 2.6.x" section gives a URI for fixes_2_2 ?
What's correct in this context- branches/fixes_2_6/ or
branches/fixes_2_6_0/ ?
I'm trying to find a 2.6.1 that will compile Lazarus 1.0. Yesterday's
daily snapsho
