Op Thu, 31 Jul 2008, schreef Michael Schnell:
procedure x(const s:integer);
var a:array[0..s] of byte;
I never understood why this is not possible in Pascal.
OTOH with dynamic arrays this is not really necessary any more, but
non-dynamic arrays of course can be faster than dynamic arrays.
procedure x(const s:integer);
var a:array[0..s] of byte;
I never understood why this is not possible in Pascal.
OTOH with dynamic arrays this is not really necessary any more, but
non-dynamic arrays of course can be faster than dynamic arrays.
-Michael
_
Op Thu, 31 Jul 2008, schreef "Vinzent Höfler":
Op Thu, 31 Jul 2008, schreef Boian Mitov:
Stupid me, to 20 years ago when I studied Fortran 77, I thought it was
obsolete :-)
I hope they at least have loops now, and who knows, it may even support
Hmm Hmm... recursion :-D .
No, Fortran is
> Op Thu, 31 Jul 2008, schreef Boian Mitov:
>
> > Stupid me, to 20 years ago when I studied Fortran 77, I thought it was
> > obsolete :-)
> > I hope they at least have loops now, and who knows, it may even support
> > Hmm Hmm... recursion :-D .
>
> No, Fortran is still in big use, and yes i
> Stupid me, to 20 years ago when I studied Fortran 77, I thought it was
> obsolete :-)
> I hope they at least have loops now, and who knows, it may even support
> Hmm Hmm... recursion :-D .
As far as I know it does. Lemme check ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortran
... yes, since Fortr
Op Thu, 31 Jul 2008, schreef Boian Mitov:
Stupid me, to 20 years ago when I studied Fortran 77, I thought it was
obsolete :-)
I hope they at least have loops now, and who knows, it may even support
Hmm Hmm... recursion :-D .
No, Fortran is still in big use, and yes it is obsolete. Howev
Mitov Software
http://www.mitov.com
- Original Message -
From: ""Vinzent Höfler"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FPC developers' list"
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 12:54 A
