Index: rtl/objpas/varutils.inc
Aded forgotten initialization
===
--- rtl/objpas/varutils.inc (revision 1083)
+++ rtl/objpas/varutils.inc (working copy)
@@ -359,6 +359,7 @@
if Res<>VAR_OK then
exit;
Result^.DimC
Any reason to re-implement the tempbuffer? Or were you just using an
older version?
regards,
Joost.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 04:21:16PM +0200, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> Any reason to re-implement the tempbuffer? Or were you just using an
> older version?
Please give me more datails (history) about "tempbuffer".
I can look deeply into ZeosLib and find out why it needs tempbuffer.
Patch with co
On 9/16/05, Joost van der Sluis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any reason to re-implement the tempbuffer? Or were you just using an
> older version?
>
> regards,
> Joost.
>
> ___
> fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
> http://lists.freep
Alexandrov Alexandru wrote:
On 9/16/05, Joost van der Sluis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any reason to re-implement the tempbuffer? Or were you just using an
older version?
regards,
Joost.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http
> > Any reason to re-implement the tempbuffer? Or were you just using an
> > older version?
> Please give me more datails (history) about "tempbuffer".
Well, it was an empty procedure. But no-one had a clue where it was used
for. Probably it had something to do with some very old fpc-TDataset-
des
> It seems that there are many delphi compatible components left that
> use tempbuffer. I have myself reintroduced this function instantly,
> becouse it is used in filtering/searching operations by my dataset
> component.
> Since this function exists in delphi and it is used by some
> components,
On 9/19/05, Joost van der Sluis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It seems that there are many delphi compatible components left that
> > use tempbuffer. I have myself reintroduced this function instantly,
> > becouse it is used in filtering/searching operations by my dataset
> > component.
> > Since
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:29:16PM +0200, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > > Any reason to re-implement the tempbuffer? Or were you just using an
> > > older version?
> > Please give me more datails (history) about "tempbuffer".
>
> Well, it was an empty procedure. But no-one had a clue where it was
