Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Martin Schreiber schrieb:
On Sunday 02 March 2008 18.48:01 Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
What did I wrong?
I'am not sure how this could be made working just a remark: -Fcutf8
influences _only_ the interpr
On Sunday 02 March 2008 19.22:38 ik wrote:
> I wonder, do you care also to try BIDI text as well ?
>
> Ido
>
No, BIDI is out of scope of MSEgui up to now, supporting all European
languages without a headache is a must.
Martin
___
fpc-devel maillist -
On Sunday 02 March 2008 19.31:37 Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Martin Schreiber schrieb:
> > On Sunday 02 March 2008 18.48:01 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> >> Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
> What did I wrong?
> >>>
> >>> I'am not sure how this could be made working just a remark: -Fcutf
Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
On Sunday 02 March 2008 18.48:01 Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
What did I wrong?
I'am not sure how this could be made working just a remark: -Fcutf8
influences _only_ the interpretation of string constants
Martin Schreiber schrieb:
> On Sunday 02 March 2008 18.48:01 Daniël Mantione wrote:
>> Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
What did I wrong?
>>> I'am not sure how this could be made working just a remark: -Fcutf8
>>> influences _only_ the interpretation of string constants when conve
I wonder, do you care also to try BIDI text as well ?
Ido
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Martin Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sunday 02 March 2008 18.48:01 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> > Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
> > >> What did I wrong?
> > >
> > > I'am not sur
On Sunday 02 March 2008 18.48:01 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
> >> What did I wrong?
> >
> > I'am not sure how this could be made working just a remark: -Fcutf8
> > influences _only_ the interpretation of string constants when converting
> > them to unicode
On Sunday 02 March 2008 18.43:01 Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Martin Schreiber schrieb:
> > What did I wrong?
>
> I'am not sure how this could be made working just a remark: -Fcutf8
> influences _only_ the interpretation of string constants when converting
> them to unicode.
I thought as much. :-)
__
Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
What did I wrong?
I'am not sure how this could be made working just a remark: -Fcutf8
influences _only_ the interpretation of string constants when converting
them to unicode.
Right. Try to compile the (utf-8 encoded) file without specifying a
Martin Schreiber schrieb:
> On Sunday 02 March 2008 15.31:04 Daniël Mantione wrote:
>>> Then the only possible way to use resourcestrings independent from the
>>> system encoding is to compile all resource units with -Fcutf8 and to
>>> write every assignment as "widestringvar:=
>>> Utf8Decode(resou
On Sunday 02 March 2008 15.31:04 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> > Then the only possible way to use resourcestrings independent from the
> > system encoding is to compile all resource units with -Fcutf8 and to
> > write every assignment as "widestringvar:=
> > Utf8Decode(resourceconstant);"?
> > Would th
Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
On Sunday 02 March 2008 14.09:47 Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
On Sunday 02 March 2008 10.22:32 Daniël Mantione wrote:
Regarding code generation, there is a difference between ansistrings and
resourcestring
On Sunday 02 March 2008 14.09:47 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
> > On Sunday 02 March 2008 10.22:32 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> >> Regarding code generation, there is a difference between ansistrings and
> >> resourcestrings, since with a resourcestring load, t
Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
On Sunday 02 March 2008 10.22:32 Daniël Mantione wrote:
Regarding code generation, there is a difference between ansistrings and
resourcestrings, since with a resourcestring load, the compiler must look
into the resourcestring tables to find the
On Sunday 02 March 2008 10.22:32 Daniël Mantione wrote:
>
> Regarding code generation, there is a difference between ansistrings and
> resourcestrings, since with a resourcestring load, the compiler must look
> into the resourcestring tables to find the ansistring constant.
>
So it is theoretical p
Op Sun, 2 Mar 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
On Friday 29 February 2008 10.07:29 Daniël Mantione wrote:
Ideally from my point of view would be if the resourcestrings are stored
in utf-8 if the unit is compiled with -Fcutf8 and decoded by utf8decode
for widestring assignment on runtime indep
On Friday 29 February 2008 10.07:29 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> >
> > Ideally from my point of view would be if the resourcestrings are stored
> > in utf-8 if the unit is compiled with -Fcutf8 and decoded by utf8decode
> > for widestring assignment on runtime independent of the system encoding.
>
> Th
Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Friday 29 February 2008 09.02:02 Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Fri, 29 Feb 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
Hi,
Is there a way in current FPC to have unicode or wide resourcestrings?
Thanks,
Resourcestrings are ansistrings, so the answer is no. This is indeed a
shortcomin
This has been discussed before. Automatic conversion to/from
ansistrings will always be to/from system encoding. If you want
another encoding than the system encoding you will have to do a manual
conversion.
Actually you as the application developer can control how conversions
between ans
> On Friday 29 February 2008 10.07:29 Dani?l Mantione wrote:
> Another suggestion:
>
> implementation
>
> resourcestrings
> resstring1 = 'abc';
> resstring2 = '1234';
>
> resourcewidestrings
> resstring3 = 'abc';
> resstring4 = '1234';
I don't like inventing Delphi incompat syntax for it, s
On 29 Feb 2008, at 09:25, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Fri, 29 Feb 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
Are there plans to implement unicode resourcestrings?
No, but this is just because you are the first one to ask.
There is already a bug report about it:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=6
On Friday 29 February 2008 10.07:29 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> Op Fri, 29 Feb 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
> > On Friday 29 February 2008 09.25:18 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> >> Op Fri, 29 Feb 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
> >>> On Friday 29 February 2008 09.02:02 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> Op F
Op Fri, 29 Feb 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
On Friday 29 February 2008 09.25:18 Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Fri, 29 Feb 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
On Friday 29 February 2008 09.02:02 Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Fri, 29 Feb 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
Hi,
Is there a way in current F
On Friday 29 February 2008 09.25:18 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> Op Fri, 29 Feb 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
> > On Friday 29 February 2008 09.02:02 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> >> Op Fri, 29 Feb 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> Is there a way in current FPC to have unicode or wide resour
On Friday 29 February 2008 09.27:08 Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > On Friday 29 February 2008 09.02:02 Dani?l Mantione wrote:
> > > Op Fri, 29 Feb 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > Is there a way in current FPC to have unicode or wide
> > > > resourcestrings? Thanks,
> > >
> > > Re
> On Friday 29 February 2008 09.02:02 Dani?l Mantione wrote:
> > Op Fri, 29 Feb 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
> > > Hi,
> > > Is there a way in current FPC to have unicode or wide resourcestrings?
> > > Thanks,
> >
> > Resourcestrings are ansistrings, so the answer is no. This is indeed a
> > sho
Op Fri, 29 Feb 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
On Friday 29 February 2008 09.02:02 Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Fri, 29 Feb 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
Hi,
Is there a way in current FPC to have unicode or wide resourcestrings?
Thanks,
Resourcestrings are ansistrings, so the answer is no.
On Friday 29 February 2008 09.02:02 Daniël Mantione wrote:
> Op Fri, 29 Feb 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
> > Hi,
> > Is there a way in current FPC to have unicode or wide resourcestrings?
> > Thanks,
>
> Resourcestrings are ansistrings, so the answer is no. This is indeed a
> shortcoming in a wi
Op Fri, 29 Feb 2008, schreef Martin Schreiber:
Hi,
Is there a way in current FPC to have unicode or wide resourcestrings?
Thanks,
Resourcestrings are ansistrings, so the answer is no. This is indeed a
shortcoming in a widestring environment, the only solution is probably to
encode them UT
Hi,
Is there a way in current FPC to have unicode or wide resourcestrings?
Thanks,
Martin
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
30 matches
Mail list logo
