Re: [fpc-devel] msgtxt.inc and msgidx.inc

2009-10-19 Thread Vincent Snijders
Florian Klaempfl schreef: Alexander Klenin schrieb: On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 18:35, Florian Klaempfl wrote: And taking into account the size of the patch (see below and ignore the auto generated files msg*.inc), it's worth to add. private etc. cause much more trouble in the compiler and has no

Re: [fpc-devel] msgtxt.inc and msgidx.inc

2009-10-19 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Jonas Maebe schrieb: > > On 19 Oct 2009, at 10:44, Florian Klaempfl wrote: > >> I still think that none of the people mainly working on the compiler use >> lazarus :) > > Actually, I mostly use Lazarus for working on the compiler nowadays, > because of its code navigation. I see :) I still navi

Re: [fpc-devel] msgtxt.inc and msgidx.inc

2009-10-19 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Micha Nelissen schrieb: > Florian Klaempfl wrote: >> I want really fast building and no external tool calling etc., that's >> why I still use the text mode ide. Not to forget that msg*.inc not the >> only auto generated files in the compiler sources: there are e.g. >> autogenerated register tables

Re: [fpc-devel] msgtxt.inc and msgidx.inc

2009-10-19 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 19 Oct 2009, at 10:44, Florian Klaempfl wrote: I still think that none of the people mainly working on the compiler use lazarus :) Actually, I mostly use Lazarus for working on the compiler nowadays, because of its code navigation. I still build on the command line using the makefile

Re: [fpc-devel] msgtxt.inc and msgidx.inc

2009-10-19 Thread Micha Nelissen
Florian Klaempfl wrote: I want really fast building and no external tool calling etc., that's why I still use the text mode ide. Not to forget that msg*.inc not the only auto generated files in the compiler sources: there are e.g. autogenerated register tables and instruction tables so this adds

Re: [fpc-devel] msgtxt.inc and msgidx.inc

2009-10-19 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Alexander Klenin schrieb: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 18:44, Florian Klaempfl > wrote: >> Alexander Klenin schrieb: >>> BTW, I have already asked in the beginning of the thread, >>> but got no answer: why are those files under version control at all? >> Because it's easier to handle when doing comp

Re: [fpc-devel] msgtxt.inc and msgidx.inc

2009-10-19 Thread Alexander Klenin
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 18:44, Florian Klaempfl wrote: > Alexander Klenin schrieb: >> BTW, I have already asked in the beginning of the thread, >> but got no answer: why are those files under version control at all? > > Because it's easier to handle when doing compiler development work What is ea

Re: [fpc-devel] msgtxt.inc and msgidx.inc

2009-10-19 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Alexander Klenin schrieb: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 18:35, Florian Klaempfl > wrote: >> And taking into account the size of the patch (see below and ignore the >> auto generated files msg*.inc), it's worth to add. private etc. cause >> much more trouble in the compiler and has no more real use im

[fpc-devel] msgtxt.inc and msgidx.inc

2009-10-19 Thread Alexander Klenin
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 18:35, Florian Klaempfl wrote: > And taking into account the size of the patch (see below and ignore the > auto generated files msg*.inc), it's worth to add. private etc. cause > much more trouble in the compiler and has no more real use imo. > >> By I guess this whole thre