>
>
> On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>> In a message dated 1/2/2005 12:31:43 P.M. Central Standard Time,
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
>> writes:
>>
>> The Free Pascal Team is pleased to announce that FPC version 1.9.6
>> (or 2.0.0-RC1) is available and ready f
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 1/2/2005 12:31:43 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes:
>
> The Free Pascal Team is pleased to announce that FPC version 1.9.6
> (or 2.0.0-RC1) is available and ready for down
In a message dated 1/2/2005 12:31:43 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
The Free
Pascal Team is pleased to announce that FPC version 1.9.6(or 2.0.0-RC1) is
available and ready for download.
Thanks, Michael.
Downloaded it this morning and it seems to be working nice
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, DrDiettrich wrote:
> > > So let me list the problems I encountered with a preceding version:
> > >
> > > - Mouse buttons inoperative (W2K, no menu selection...)
> > > - "\\" contained in all stored pathes, IMO due to input of the FPC
> > > directory ending with an "\".
> >
>
Peter Vreman wrote:
> >> If no major bugs are found, version 2.0 will be released in a short
> >> timeframe.
Only one major problem so far. Congratulations! :-)
> > So let me list the problems I encountered with a preceding version:
> >
> > - Mouse buttons inoperative (W2K, no menu selection...
Tomas Hajny wrote:
> You can always download just the needed parts from
> ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/beta/i386-win32-1.9.6/separate/ (for win32).
> You should always get install.exe and install.dat, then base.i386-win32.zip
> which contains the compiler and RTL. Whatever else is up to you
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 4 jan 2005, at 15:27, peter green wrote:
lazarus is essentially what completes the cloning of delphi by
freepascal.
I prefer to think that we're much more than just a clone of Delphi :)
In fact, I've never even used Delphi in my entire life (nor really
used Lazarus, for th
On 4 jan 2005, at 15:27, peter green wrote:
lazarus is essentially what completes the cloning of delphi by
freepascal.
I prefer to think that we're much more than just a clone of Delphi :)
In fact, I've never even used Delphi in my entire life (nor really used
Lazarus, for that matter).
Jonas
_
>If you go this way I'd suggest adding also Lazarus.
>I know the thing is "just another project made with FPC" but I think it
>would be good for both.
lazarus and freepascal are far closer than that.
lazarus is essentially what completes the cloning of delphi by freepascal.
_
> >
> >Maybe we should start making CDs and sell them for the
> >price of CD+Shipping. Like Marco proposed.
> >(He's been shouting in the desert since years... ;-) )
> >
> >
> >Michael.
> >
> >
> If you go this way I'd suggest adding also Lazarus.
> I know the thing is "just another project made
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:41:59 +0100, DrDiettrich wrote
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > If no major bugs are found, version 2.0 will be released in a short
> > > timeframe.
> >
> > I would like to test the Win32 distribution, but the archives are too
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:41:59 +0100, DrDiettrich wrote
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If no major bugs are found, version 2.0 will be released in a short
timeframe.
I would like to test the Win32 distribution, but th
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:41:59 +0100, DrDiettrich wrote
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > If no major bugs are found, version 2.0 will be released in a short
> > timeframe.
>
> I would like to test the Win32 distribution, but the archives are too
> big for an download (narrow band) :-(
.
.
You ca
>> If no major bugs are found, version 2.0 will be released in a short
>> timeframe.
>
> I would like to test the Win32 distribution, but the archives are too
> big for an download (narrow band) :-(
There are separate downloads available. And if you want even smaller
download use CVS and build it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If no major bugs are found, version 2.0 will be released in a short
> timeframe.
I would like to test the Win32 distribution, but the archives are too
big for an download (narrow band) :-(
So let me list the problems I encountered with a preceding version:
- Mouse but
15 matches
Mail list logo