Op Sun, 4 Feb 2007, schreef Martin Schreiber:
> On Sunday 04 February 2007 11.58, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> > > - Null based index.
> >
> > You can ignore the char 0?
> >
> [...]
>
> Do you think it is possible with this methods to achieve the same or better
> performance as with ansi strings
On Sunday 04 February 2007 11.58, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> > - Null based index.
>
> You can ignore the char 0?
>
[...]
Do you think it is possible with this methods to achieve the same or better
performance as with ansi strings or refcounted widestrings?
Martin
On 04 Feb 2007, at 12:01, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 4 Feb 2007, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
- No unique check by assigning to character.
True. But maybe we should simply allow to overload [] then.
Not necessary, wrap it into an object and define a default property.
Then you can't tak
Op Sun, 4 Feb 2007, schreef Marco van de Voort:
> > Op Sun, 4 Feb 2007, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
> >
> > > > - No unique check by assigning to character.
> > >
> > > True. But maybe we should simply allow to overload [] then.
> >
> > Not necessary, wrap it into an object and define a default
> What's wrong with
>
> type
>tmywidestring = type array of widechar;
a number of things
1: afaict it lacks the automatic refcounting/copy on write semantics of strings
2: it doesn't allow specification of the allocators/deallocators which causes
problems for its safe passing to dlls etc
__
> Op Sun, 4 Feb 2007, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
>
> > > - No unique check by assigning to character.
> >
> > True. But maybe we should simply allow to overload [] then.
>
> Not necessary, wrap it into an object and define a default property.
- Object is not refcounted, which is why dyn array is
> Martin Schreiber schrieb:
> >
> > - Null based index.
>
> You can ignore the char 0?
Then you need to implement a conversion for pwidechar(x).
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/f
Op Sun, 4 Feb 2007, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
> > - No unique check by assigning to character.
>
> True. But maybe we should simply allow to overload [] then.
Not necessary, wrap it into an object and define a default property.
Daniël___
fpc-devel m
Martin Schreiber schrieb:
On Sunday 04 February 2007 10.57, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
peter green schrieb:
if my understanding is correct this should allow all the widestrings
stuff to be moved to the library and people to implement thier own
string types as required (for example maybe a widestri
On Sunday 04 February 2007 10.57, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> peter green schrieb:
> > if my understanding is correct this should allow all the widestrings
> > stuff to be moved to the library and people to implement thier own
> > string types as required (for example maybe a widestring counterpart
>
peter green schrieb:
if my understanding is correct this should allow all the widestrings
stuff to be moved to the library and people to implement thier own
string types as required (for example maybe a widestring counterpart
for some system that is similar to com)
What's wrong with
type
tmy
On Sunday 04 February 2007 01.23, peter green wrote:
> from a low level perspective such a string is just a pointer to an array
> plus some compiler magic just like current ansistrings, debugging tools
> shouldn't need to be aware of the magic any more than they need to be aware
> of it for curren
On Sunday 04 February 2007 01.01, peter green wrote:
> currently there is some demand for a fast widestring type on windows and i
> suspect there will be requirements for more string types in the future.
>
> So i make a proposal for a new syntax that will allow string types to be
> created easilly
On Sunday 04 February 2007 01:01, peter green wrote:
> currently there is some demand for a fast widestring type on windows and i
> suspect there will be requirements for more string types in the future.
During the creation of our project, Technetium (www.technetium.dk), we
designed a string libr
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daniël
> Mantione
> Sent: 04 February 2007 00:09
> To: FPC developers' list
> Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] strings: a proposeal
>
>
>
>
> Op Sun, 4 Feb 2007, sch
Op Sun, 4 Feb 2007, schreef peter green:
> my proposal is a statement like
>
> type
> tmystring=string(elementtype,allocator,deallocator,copier,uniquer);
And how should you generate debug information for such a user defined
string?
Daniël___
fpc-
16 matches
Mail list logo
