Hi,
I'm using fpmake more and more in my projects (large or small) and from time to
time I come across some limitations that need to be resolved. In the past I
have supplied a number of small patches which were normally applied without
problems, but sometimes I was sent back (mostly with good r
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
Hi,
I'm using fpmake more and more in my projects (large or small) and from time to time I
come across some limitations that need to be resolved. In the past I have supplied a
number of small patches which were normally applied without problems, bu
Am 30.03.2011 17:31, schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
>> - execute fpmake from command line (see thread by mattias : "run
>> pascal programs as script") for this we would need instantfpc to
>> support win32 and it should be supplied as a standard fpc tool
>
> I doubt this is feasible for window
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Am 30.03.2011 17:31, schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
- execute fpmake from command line (see thread by mattias : "run
pascal programs as script") for this we would need instantfpc to
support win32 and it should be supplied as a standard fpc too
In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
> > - implement the creation of installer (scripts) for all platforms
>
> I doubt a cross-platform installer is feasible within the scope of FPC.
> If you mean the creation of a skeleton inno setup script or a .rpm or .deb
> spec, that can
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:57:48 +0200 (CEST)
mar...@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
> In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
> > > - implement the creation of installer (scripts) for all platforms
> >
> > I doubt a cross-platform installer is feasible within the scope of FPC.
On Mar 30, 2011, at 5:31 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
>> - managing debug/release builds (also cross-compiling)
>
> What is failing in the current system for this ?
I was thinking to be able to do something like :
>fpmake build debug
This will add some debug options to the build proc
On Mar 30, 2011, at 5:46 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>
>> Am 30.03.2011 17:31, schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
- execute fpmake from command line (see thread by mattias : "run
pascal programs as script") for this we wou
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
On Mar 30, 2011, at 5:31 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
- managing debug/release builds (also cross-compiling)
What is failing in the current system for this ?
I was thinking to be able to do something like :
fpmake build debug
This
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
On Mar 30, 2011, at 5:46 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Am 30.03.2011 17:31, schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
- execute fpmake from command line (see thread by mattias : "run
pascal progra
On Mar 30, 2011, at 9:08 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 30, 2011, at 5:31 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
>>
- managing debug/release builds (also cross-compiling)
>>>
>>> What is failing in the current system for th
On Mar 30, 2011, at 9:12 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>> - execute fpmake from command line (see thread by mattias : "run
>> pascal programs as script") for this we would need instantfpc to
>> support win32 and it should be supplied as a standard fpc tool
>
> I doubt this is
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
On Mar 30, 2011, at 9:08 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
On Mar 30, 2011, at 5:31 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
- managing debug/release builds (also cross-compiling)
What is failing in the
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
On Mar 30, 2011, at 9:12 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
- execute fpmake from command line (see thread by mattias : "run
pascal programs as script") for this we would need instantfpc to
support win32 and it should be supplied as a standard fpc tool
On Mar 30, 2011, at 9:29 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>> - managing debug/release builds (also cross-compiling)
>
> What is failing in the current system for this ?
I was thinking to be able to do something like :
> fpmake build debug
This will add so
On Mar 30, 2011, at 9:37 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>> I don't think this is needed/wanted. fpmake.pp is intended to be used in
>>> tandem with fppkg, and that looks for a fpmake.pp program, not a script.
>> For FPC yes, but for standalone projects this is not the case as you
>> mentioned.
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
On Mar 30, 2011, at 9:29 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
- managing debug/release builds (also cross-compiling)
What is failing in the current system for this ?
I was thinking to be able to do something like :
fpmake build debug
This will add
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
On Mar 30, 2011, at 9:37 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I don't think this is needed/wanted. fpmake.pp is intended to be used in tandem
with fppkg, and that looks for a fpmake.pp program, not a script.
For FPC yes, but for standalone projects thi
On Mar 30, 2011, at 11:46 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>> fpmake build debug
>>>
>>> I would prefer a named option, i.e.
>>>
>>> fpmake build --profile=debug
>> from the users perspective this is not very friendly.
>
> It is more clear what is meant. All other options are also specified
> (not to mention all the possible complications on Windows, probably Mac
> OS as well)
Can you name a potential issue you see by renaming the makefile to some
other extension? I thought that FPC does not mind which extension you use,
as long as the syntax is correct?
>>>
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
On Mar 30, 2011, at 11:46 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
fpmake build debug
I would prefer a named option, i.e.
fpmake build --profile=debug
from the users perspective this is not very friendly.
It is more clear what is meant. All other option
> Imagine you have debug, profiling and testing setup locally b
Should be debug, release and testing
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
(not to mention all the possible complications on Windows, probably Mac OS as
well)
Can you name a potential issue you see by renaming the makefile to some other
extension? I thought that FPC does not mind which extension you use, as long as
the s
23 matches
Mail list logo
