Ralf Quint wrote:
On 12/18/2014 2:09 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I presume that the early enthusiasm had largely dissipated by the time
IBM started pushing it as a 32-bit OS, with a new binary format etc.
OS/2 is 32bit (for the most part) since v2.0, released in 1992 and it
became actually
On Thu, December 18, 2014 21:54, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Thu, December 18, 2014 19:49, Ralf Quint wrote:
On 12/17/2014 2:56 PM, mark diener wrote:
Ralf, I am not goint to tell you to do anything, but gently suggest
that you chill out.
Well, how about you live what you are preaching?
I'd like
2014-12-17 21:38 GMT+01:00 rpzrpz...@gmail.com rpzrpz...@gmail.com:
Ralf, Such passion for obsolescence...
What is the use case other than a hobby and pride for OS/2 support?
Hopefully, FPC core maintainers are not distracted by the legacy support.
FPC maintainers don't hesitate to stop
Tomas Hajny wrote:
Switching to fpc-other as a more appropriate space: I believe that
although my time available for FPC is quite limited, my activities related
to OS/2 target in FPC in the last few years show more than clearly that I
want to continue support of this target regardless of the
