Re: [fpc-other] Re: fpc-other Digest, Vol 62, Issue 1

2012-10-07 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 07 Oct 2012, at 12:17, Marco van de Voort wrote: > Why run a separate forum from Lazarus? The current fora are already separate, so switching to better forum software would have been an improvement as far as I'm concerned. Merging the FPC and Lazarus fora has been discussed/proposed for man

Re: [fpc-other] Re: fpc-other Digest, Vol 62, Issue 1

2012-10-07 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said: > > Highly regrettable, but at least it happened /before/ all of the mailing > > lists etc. were transitioned to a system which the core project > > maintainers didn't understand and might not be in control of. > > I don't think he ever insisted on that,

Re: [fpc-other] Re: fpc-other Digest, Vol 62, Issue 1

2012-10-07 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said: > > > > He unsubscribed from all FPC lists immediately after he sent his last > > message. > > Highly regrettable, but at least it happened /before/ all of the mailing > lists etc. were transitioned to a system which the core project > maintaine

Re: [fpc-other] Re: fpc-other Digest, Vol 62, Issue 1

2012-10-07 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 07 Oct 2012, at 12:06, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Jonas Maebe wrote: >> On 06 Oct 2012, at 23:17, Tomas Hajny wrote: >>> To be fair, it's probably useful to mention that the example forum prepared >>> by Peter should be better compared to the forum we currently provide on FPC >>> pages (comm

Re: [fpc-other] Re: fpc-other Digest, Vol 62, Issue 1

2012-10-07 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Jonas Maebe wrote: On 06 Oct 2012, at 23:17, Tomas Hajny wrote: To be fair, it's probably useful to mention that the example forum prepared by Peter should be better compared to the forum we currently provide on FPC pages (community.freepascal.org) rather than NNTP newsgroups, etc., which we

Re: [fpc-other] Re: fpc-other Digest, Vol 62, Issue 1

2012-10-07 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 06 Oct 2012, at 23:17, Tomas Hajny wrote: > To be fair, it's probably useful to mention that the example forum > prepared by Peter should be better compared to the forum we currently > provide on FPC pages (community.freepascal.org) rather than NNTP > newsgroups, etc., which we do not provi

Re: [fpc-other] Re: fpc-other Digest, Vol 62, Issue 1

2012-10-06 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 6 Oct 12, at 17:12, Giuliano Colla wrote: > Cephas Atheos ha scritto: > [..] > > > > I knew that I wasn't going to convince anyone who wasn't willing to give > > new technology a fair go! But we do need to at least be fair with our > > evaluation of technology, not just go with what we know and

Re: [fpc-other] Re: fpc-other Digest, Vol 62, Issue 1

2012-10-06 Thread Giuliano Colla
Cephas Atheos ha scritto: [..] I knew that I wasn't going to convince anyone who wasn't willing to give new technology a fair go! But we do need to at least be fair with our evaluation of technology, not just go with what we know and love. It's not fair to the users who may not know the differen

Re: [fpc-other] Re: fpc-other Digest, Vol 62, Issue 1

2012-10-06 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 2012-10-06 00:08, Cephas Atheos wrote: > > You're not seriously comparing nntp clients with > browser clients and claiming that news servers are just as popular and > useable as forums, and more reliable to boot? Seriously? Seriously? Well, I think so. > One of the critical points I tried to

[fpc-other] Re: fpc-other Digest, Vol 62, Issue 1

2012-10-05 Thread Cephas Atheos
> >NNTP and Mailing Lists are better the Web forums for the simple reason >that >you can pull the whole history onto your own computer and it is there for >good. Quite simply you get a whole archive of all the activity on the >mailing list or newsgroup from the time you joined,and even going back >