Lev Lafayette wrote:
> and like the TurboPascal critter from all those years ago, verdade? If
Yes.
> this is so, where does it live in the filesystem? Not that coding in
> vi(m)/emacs/pico etc is a problem as such...
/usr/bin/fp ? It's named 'fp' in any case.
Micha
_
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 09:34 +0100, Micha Nelissen wrote:
> Lev Lafayette wrote:
> > and like the TurboPascal critter from all those years ago, verdade? If
>
> Yes.
>
> > this is so, where does it live in the filesystem? Not that coding in
> > vi(m)/emacs/pico etc is a problem as such...
>
> /usr
Mmm... shiny.
Maybe you should try Lazarus as well, a GUI-RAD based on Free Pascal (FPC).
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/
If you're familiar with Delphi, you might thought Lazarus is a Delphi-like IDE
for FPC. Lazarus is alot shinier than FPC's default text-mode IDE. ;)
-Bee-
has Bee.og
Hi,
I'd like to show to some people that FreePascal can do good graphical
and efficient things :o)
So I organise an eye candy contest, with some simple rules, and I'll
give three rewards ($150, $100 and $50) for the three best programs.
The rules :
-The end of the contest is December 15th (i
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Marc PERTRON wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to show to some people that FreePascal can do good graphical and
> efficient things :o)
> So I organise an eye candy contest, with some simple rules, and I'll give
> three rewards ($150, $100 and $50) for the three best programs.
Indep
Michael Van Canneyt a écrit :
Independent of this, you may want to show your 'people':
http://www.freepascal.org/gallery.html
There are some very nifty graphics programs. Pixel32 for instance. Voxel.
Or the games. Probably the pascal game development site has also some
nice screenshots.
The
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Marc PERTRON wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt a écrit :
> >
> > Independent of this, you may want to show your 'people':
> >
> > http://www.freepascal.org/gallery.html
> >
> > There are some very nifty graphics programs. Pixel32 for instance. Voxel.
> > Or the games. Probably the
I have a question (for ROPS) in FPC that is way over my head.
- Can you find out how FPC expects string/interface/variant results ?
Is there documentation where I could get this information? I think it
is about cpu registers, etc. (?)
Also, I might ask, how does FPC expect parameters passing? A
On 01 Nov 2006, at 14:30, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
- Can you find out how FPC expects string/interface/variant results ?
Is there documentation where I could get this information? I think it
is about cpu registers, etc. (?)
Also, I might ask, how does FPC expect parameters passing? And Method
Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 01 Nov 2006, at 14:30, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
>
>> - Can you find out how FPC expects string/interface/variant results ?
>>
>> Is there documentation where I could get this information? I think it
>> is about cpu registers, etc. (?)
>>
>> Also, I might ask, how does FPC ex
2006/11/1, Tomas Hajny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 01 Nov 2006, at 14:30, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
>
>> - Can you find out how FPC expects string/interface/variant results ?
>>
>> Is there documentation where I could get this information? I think it
>> is about cpu registers, etc
2006/11/1, Tomas Hajny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 01 Nov 2006, at 14:30, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
>
>> - Can you find out how FPC expects string/interface/variant results ?
>>
>> Is there documentation where I could get this information? I think it
>> is about cpu registers, etc
Dear list,
I was thinking of writing a daemon in freepascal. When the program is
started it will ask for a password. Then keep the pass in a string
variable, using it every 10 minutes.
It's not for an high security environment but I'm interested in
general. How to protect those information in me
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Johannes Nohl wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I was thinking of writing a daemon in freepascal. When the program is
> started it will ask for a password. Then keep the pass in a string
> variable, using it every 10 minutes.
>
> It's not for an high security environment but I'm inte
Johannes Nohl a écrit :
Dear list,
I was thinking of writing a daemon in freepascal. When the program is
started it will ask for a password. Then keep the pass in a string
variable, using it every 10 minutes.
It's not for an high security environment but I'm interested in
general. How to protec
On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 12:19:57 +0100
Marc PERTRON wrote:
The usual answer is 'yes but you can do that with VB too'.
I don't want people to compare VB and FP, but to see that FP is as good
as C for heavy things ;o)
And an eye-candy is one of the best examples :)
--
Marc
Lots of people are very fo
hello all
i've noticed that DateToStr gives correct results on win32 (regarding
locale), but on linux and osx it always gives the date as dd-mm-.
i read somewhere in the archives that there's a problem implementing
this due to the need to link to libc or something (hand wavy). can
anyone she
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 15:55, Marc PERTRON wrote:
> dictionary attacks';
> pwd := md5('My Secret Password' + salt);
> end;
And where do you think the phrase 'My Secret Password' would be stored
other than memory?
Vinzent.
___
fpc-pascal mai
Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> 2006/11/1, Tomas Hajny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Jonas Maebe wrote:
>> > On 01 Nov 2006, at 14:30, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
>> >
>> >> - Can you find out how FPC expects string/interface/variant results ?
>> >>
>> >> Is there documentation where I could get this information
Tomas Hajny schrieb:
Not that recently - the calling convention hasn't changed during 2.x
lifetime. Moreover, you can still force the old behaviour, i.e. you aren't
Well, the calling conventions are changed if this is required because
they are incompatible e.g. broken. So if we discover that w
On 1 nov 2006, at 17:35, Tomas Hajny wrote:
We don't expect to change the current default any more (although
we cannot guarantee that fully), and almost certainly not within 2.x
series.
Actually, someone recently found out our register calling convention
on i386 is incompatible with Delphi'
And where do you think the phrase 'My Secret Password' would be stored
other than memory?
so you have to override variables after use? like
var pwd: array[0..15] of char;
xpwd: string;
[...]
readln(pwd);
xpwd := encrypt(pwd);
pwd := '123456789012345'; // override
[...]
???
_
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Henry Vermaak wrote:
> hello all
>
> i've noticed that DateToStr gives correct results on win32 (regarding
> locale), but on linux and osx it always gives the date as dd-mm-.
> i read somewhere in the archives that there's a problem implementing
> this due to the need to
I all,
when using -Xe option DBG is working, but when using -Xi it is not. Is
it normal? (Using an old 3823 revision.)
I tried r4479 (v2.0.4) and v2.0.4 FPC version but -Xe is not an
available switch. And debuger is not working without it. Is there
anything to do with that?
--
Alexandre Leclerc
2006/10/31, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2006/10/31, Jesus Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> --- Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest
> > compiler
> > in svn. Is there a compiler switch required
Alexandre Leclerc schrieb:
For now, the only thing I'm sure about is that with version 2.0.4 of
the compiler it is working correctly with ROPS for this problem.
Can't you try the binary search to find the revision causing trouble?
Are there any fpc defines in the ROPS sources? Where are the
At 21:23 1-11-2006, you wrote:
I all,
when using -Xe option DBG is working, but when using -Xi it is not. Is
it normal? (Using an old 3823 revision.)
It works with current SVN.
Peter
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
ht
2006/11/1, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alexandre Leclerc schrieb:
>
> For now, the only thing I'm sure about is that with version 2.0.4 of
> the compiler it is working correctly with ROPS for this problem.
>
Can't you try the binary search to find the revision causing trouble?
Are ther
2006/11/1, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 21:23 1-11-2006, you wrote:
>I all,
>
>when using -Xe option DBG is working, but when using -Xi it is not. Is
>it normal? (Using an old 3823 revision.)
It works with current SVN.
Ok, I see; I tested the latest version and it works great. (Is it t
At 21:43 1-11-2006, you wrote:
2006/11/1, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alexandre Leclerc schrieb:
>
> For now, the only thing I'm sure about is that with version 2.0.4 of
> the compiler it is working correctly with ROPS for this problem.
>
Can't you try the binary search to find the re
At 21:47 1-11-2006, you wrote:
2006/11/1, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 21:23 1-11-2006, you wrote:
>I all,
>
>when using -Xe option DBG is working, but when using -Xi it is not. Is
>it normal? (Using an old 3823 revision.)
It works with current SVN.
Ok, I see; I tested the latest vers
On 01 Nov 2006, at 21:43, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
Binary search is complex because I have difficulties to get a FPC
revision that will be able to compile latest Lazarus version...
(unless I do not need to recompile my Laz each time but simple
replacing the fpcsrc & pp folders?)
Does ROPS dep
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Marc PERTRON wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to show to some people that FreePascal can do good graphical and
>> efficient things :o)
>> So I organise an eye candy contest, with some simple rules, and I'll give
>> three rewards ($150, $100 and $50
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Marc Weustink wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Marc PERTRON wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'd like to show to some people that FreePascal can do good graphical and
> >> efficient things :o)
> >> So I organise an eye candy contest, with some simp
2006/11/1, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 21:43 1-11-2006, you wrote:
>2006/11/1, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>Alexandre Leclerc schrieb:
>> >
>> > For now, the only thing I'm sure about is that with version 2.0.4 of
>> > the compiler it is working correctly with ROPS for this pr
2006/11/1, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 01 Nov 2006, at 21:43, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> Binary search is complex because I have difficulties to get a FPC
> revision that will be able to compile latest Lazarus version...
> (unless I do not need to recompile my Laz each time but simple
>
Marc PERTRON wrote:
The rules :
-The program MUST : *Compile and work in fullscreen mode under Ubuntu
6.10 (i386), in at least 640x480, 800x600 and 1024x768 with Gnome or KDE
I'd recommend saying fullscreen in at least 640x480, 800x600 _OR_ 1024x768.
If you are using 3d style rendering then
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 16:36 +0700, Bisma Jayadi wrote:
> > Mmm... shiny.
>
> Maybe you should try Lazarus as well, a GUI-RAD based on Free Pascal (FPC).
>
> http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/
>
> If you're familiar with Delphi, you might thought Lazarus is a Delphi-like
> IDE
> for FPC. Lazaru
Neil Graham a écrit :
I'd recommend saying fullscreen in at least 640x480, 800x600 _OR_
1024x768.
If you are using 3d style rendering then resolution changes are not
much of an issue. But if you are going for 2d and bitmap effects,
often the best results come
from designing for a particula
Marc PERTRON wrote:
Neil Graham a écrit :
I'd recommend saying fullscreen in at least 640x480, 800x600 _OR_
1024x768.
If you are using 3d style rendering then resolution changes are not
much of an issue. But if you are going for 2d and bitmap effects,
often the best results come
from des
Steve Williams a écrit :
What about displays that aren't your standard 4:3 ratio, such as my
dual 1920x1200 widescreens or my 1024x600 handheld?
Well, i ask *at least* the 3 resolutions i gave.
You can do more... :o)
Also, as i give the money i also give the minimal requirements and i
think
41 matches
Mail list logo
