I haven't dabbled into the DB components in FPC and Lazarus much. Does
Free Pascal have a TClientDataset? Has anybody done any 3-tier
development with Free Pascal?
The last time I did 3-tier development with Delphi 7 was some 5 years
ago. I found this link which is a drop in replacement for the D
Hello,
I've created for my own use a bash script file that try to find for me
the proper library that contain a function when I create binding for
libraries.
The script file can be found at
http://ik.homelinux.org/projects/files/find_function.sh .
I wish to create an addition to Lazarus that will
leledumbo wrote:
OK, I've read http://wiki.freepascal.org/Modernised_Pascal this (and the
FAQ as well). I disagree with any statement saying that for .. in loop is
only a type-saver. It's a good language extension and should be included
(since Delphi already have this, it will also be a good id
'JcfStringUtils.pas' very strange looking code.
Please, what format is the file in?
Thanks!
ô¿ô
V e r n
WinXp sp2 , Delphi5, WebDwarf, Trellian WebPage,
Lazarus-0.9.26-fpc-2.2.2-win32.exe,
wxPython2.8-win32-unicode-2.8.9.1-py26.exe , Boa 0.6.1
http://www.flickr.com/photos/vmars956/
Wanted
Hello Eduardo,
Friday, January 23, 2009, 1:46:59 PM, you wrote:
>>I'm using FPC 2.2.2 running over WinXP SP2. Are there any technical
>>reasons that expains that a program runs faster using all checks ( I/O,
>>Range, Overflow, Stack and Verify calls ) with optimization level 1
>>and using heaptra
Giovanni Premuda schreef:
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Anybody (also Giovanni Premuda) anyone spread this all over the
Lazarus site
OK, I had the wrong impression that the lazarus docs where editable only
by insiders, as the main site seems to be.
Good, Lazarus is essentially a community proje
At 01:10 23/01/2009, you wrote:
Hello FPC-Pascal,
I'm using FPC 2.2.2 running over WinXP SP2. Are there any technical
reasons that expains that a program runs faster using all checks ( I/O,
Range, Overflow, Stack and Verify calls ) with optimization level 1
and using heaptrace, than the same one
Hello leledumbo,
Friday, January 23, 2009, 7:55:28 AM, you wrote:
l> Perhaps bugs in the optimizer, I usually get MUCH faster code with
l> optimization. Well... depending on the code. You can try examining the
l> assembler output (-a compiler switch, -alnrt for more informative output).
I had do
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Paul Ishenin wrote:
>
> Here in
> http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/trunk/components/jcf2/Utils/JcfStringUtils.pas
> I used the same code :)
Thanks Paul, I feel better already! I'm not alone. :-)
Regards,
- Graeme -