Vincent Snijders wrote:
>
> I didn't think Mattias commented on this thread. Do you mean Matthias,
ah, spelling mistake from my side. Yes, I was agreeing with what Matthias
Klumpp said.
> who suggested to use Git on the FPC svn server?
Then we can't call it a FPC SVN server any more. :-) I rea
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
I agree with Mattias.
I didn't think Mattias commented on this thread. Do you mean Matthias,
who suggested to use Git on the FPC svn server?
Vincent
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://list
Bee Jay wrote:
>
> If it would use fpWeb then I refuse to be the project owner because I
> almost know nothing about fpWeb.
Well if you don't use it, you will never learn it. There seems to be 4 or
so developers interested in this. ANYBODY, just create a damn repository
and start coding - no p
Vincent Snijders wrote:
>
> A. Because there no Git Server on the FPC SVN server.
Git doesn't need a server/daemon app to work on a server - anyway, git
includes everything needed. Anyway, SourceForge and GitHub etc all support
Git repositories with no problems - so we don't need to disturb the F
Lukas Gradl wrote:
Hi!
I'm having serious troubles compiling a DLL for 64bit Windows.
I'm using FPC svn 1 (Ver 2.5.1) on all machines. I tried on WinXP
32bit (works), Vista 64bit (doesn't work), Win7 32Bit (works) and Win7
64bit (doesn't work).
> rMonitor=packed record
...
end;
r
Hi!
I'm having serious troubles compiling a DLL for 64bit Windows.
I'm using FPC svn 1 (Ver 2.5.1) on all machines. I tried on WinXP
32bit (works), Vista 64bit (doesn't work), Win7 32Bit (works) and Win7
64bit (doesn't work).
The DLL works as a print-monitor, providing a virtual printer p
2009/12/17 Michael Van Canneyt :
>
> I don't see the benefit in that. Compiler defines are evil, no need to
> promote them.
The compiler defines for linking persistence layers are limited to one
unit out of about three hundred units - no compiler defines are in
your actual project code, only in th
Matthias Klumpp schreef:
server, this is not really a problem.
Why don't use Git this time?
A. Because there no Git Server on the FPC SVN server.
It's making code review and code merging from
other sources a lot easier.
I don't understand what you mean here.
Vincent
__
The advantage of fpweb is that it doesn't matter whether you want to
use
an apache module, plain cgi or fastcgi, or in a standalone server.
It works with all 4 types.
Is there any demo or documentation about them, especially the FCGI? I
only saw CGI demos and very lack of documentation arou
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:23:08 +0100 (CET), Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Bee Jay wrote:
>
>>> Well, fpWeb is winner, yes?
>>> Bee can create a sourceforge project?
>>
>> If it would use fpWeb then I refuse to be the project owner because I
>> almost
>> know nothing about fpWeb.
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:23:08 +0100 (CET), Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Bee Jay wrote:
>
>>> Well, fpWeb is winner, yes?
>>> Bee can create a sourceforge project?
>>
>> If it would use fpWeb then I refuse to be the project owner because I
>> almost
>> know nothing about fpWeb.
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Bee Jay wrote:
Well, fpWeb is winner, yes?
Bee can create a sourceforge project?
If it would use fpWeb then I refuse to be the project owner because I almost
know nothing about fpWeb. I even intend to study fpWeb from this project. The
project owner should be someone w
Well, fpWeb is winner, yes?
Bee can create a sourceforge project?
If it would use fpWeb then I refuse to be the project owner because I
almost know nothing about fpWeb. I even intend to study fpWeb from
this project. The project owner should be someone who knows how to
build (at least) the
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The advantage of fpweb is that it doesn't matter whether you want to use
an apache module, plain cgi or fastcgi, or in a standalone server.
It works with all 4 types.
That's good news! Can you explain more about what
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
And what should it do according to you ?
IMHO tiOPF kicks in too late; the layer is loaded only once, at program startup.
Exactly why I'm asking your? :-) Can the initialization code in SqlDB
(firebird embedded) not b
Well, fpWeb is winner, yes?
Bee can create a sourceforge project?
2009/12/17 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>
>> The advantage of fpweb is that it doesn't matter whether you want to use
>> an apache module, plain cgi or fastcgi, or in a standalone server.
>> It works with all 4
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> And what should it do according to you ?
> IMHO tiOPF kicks in too late; the layer is loaded only once, at program
> startup.
Exactly why I'm asking your? :-) Can the initialization code in SqlDB
(firebird embedded) not be delayed or overridden slightly later - aft
> You can extend TQueue to have a method to insert the integer as pointers.
Thanks for the answer, but I already found a way of using TQueue directly to
solve my problem.
R.
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-po
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> The advantage of fpweb is that it doesn't matter whether you want to use
> an apache module, plain cgi or fastcgi, or in a standalone server.
> It works with all 4 types.
That's good news! Can you explain more about what you mean by "standalone
server"? One of our
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
All it takes (if you use sqldb) is 1 statement in a unit initialization or
program startup code:
uses ibase60dyn; // must be there
Begin
UseEmbeddedFirebird:=True;
Thanks Michael. Any thoughts on a tiOPF patch
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> All it takes (if you use sqldb) is 1 statement in a unit initialization or
> program startup code:
>
> uses ibase60dyn; // must be there
>
> Begin
>UseEmbeddedFirebird:=True;
>
Thanks Michael. Any thoughts on a tiOPF patch for the SqlDB persistence
layer? ;
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Roberto Padovani wrote:
What about data encryption? Is anyone of those providing it ?
Firebird definitely not.
Personally, I don't think that this is the task of a database engine...
Michael.
Thanks!
R#
2009/12/16 ik :
You also have Firebird Embeeded and MySQL E
So I would recommend going with something closer to home (part of
FPC) -
like fpWeb. This gives much better certainty that it will be
continuously
maintained - even if that only means no new feature but at least
compilable
with latest FPC.
Yes, that's also the main reason of mine to build
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Andreas Berger wrote:
If I made one, then I'll make it using Powtils (fully CGI) or ExtPascal
(fully Ajax) because that's what I know and have been experience with. I
myself prefer to use fpWeb since it's provided by FPC's FCL. No third party
dependency is good for new
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, ik wrote:
You need to bind the embedded API for it, and the rest is the same. You act
like it's a server.
I haven't done it myself, only read about it in the Firebird's source
documentation :)
All it takes (if you use sqldb) is 1 statement in a unit initialization or
> I need a queue that can store integer values. Is there any way to use
TQueue for this task
You can extend TQueue to have a method to insert the integer as pointers.
Ex:
type
TMyQueue = class(TQueue)
public
procedure AddInt(const Integer: i);
end;
... // implementation
procedure TMy
You need to bind the embedded API for it, and the rest is the same. You act
like it's a server.
I haven't done it myself, only read about it in the Firebird's source
documentation :)
Ido
http://ik.homelinux.org/
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt wr
27 matches
Mail list logo
