hello all;
I have converted b-tree filer to work on Free Pascal on Windows Xp
and Windows 7. Two of the function do not work, (reorg rekey). I
wrote three function that do the same thing, only two are needed I
have a demo (part of my program)
the editor and map driver and graphics demo one te
On 2012-11-09 22:44, waldo kitty wrote:
>
> yes, sorry...
OK, I currently have the following layout. I like to keep paths to
libraries and projects as should as possible. I used to use
/opt/fpc-x.y.z/ and /opt/laz/ etc. /opt and /home is normally in
separate partitions so that if I update (reins
Am 09.11.2012 20:53, schrieb waldo kitty:
when you add additional libraries to your FPC and/or Lazarus
installation, how do you normally do it? where do you normally place them?
i'm thinking of libraries like synapse, fpGUI, tiOPF and similar...
It depends. If the libraries contains GUI elemen
On 11/9/2012 16:42, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2012-11-09 19:53, waldo kitty wrote:
when you add additional libraries to your FPC and/or Lazarus installation, how
do you normally do it? where do you normally place them?
Do you mean your directory layout on your hard drive?
yes, sorry...
c
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> On Fri, November 9, 2012 17:38, ik wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>>> On Fri, November 9, 2012 17:01, ik wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Jonas Maebe
wrote:
> On 09 Nov 2012, at 16:06, ik wrote
On 2012-11-09 19:53, waldo kitty wrote:
>
> when you add additional libraries to your FPC and/or Lazarus installation,
> how
> do you normally do it? where do you normally place them?
Do you mean your directory layout on your hard drive?
Regards,
- Graeme -
when you add additional libraries to your FPC and/or Lazarus installation, how
do you normally do it? where do you normally place them?
i'm thinking of libraries like synapse, fpGUI, tiOPF and similar...
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.f
On Fri, November 9, 2012 17:38, ik wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>> On Fri, November 9, 2012 17:01, ik wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Jonas Maebe
>>> wrote:
On 09 Nov 2012, at 16:06, ik wrote:
And if I do it without the hash, then it's just
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> On Fri, November 9, 2012 17:01, ik wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Jonas Maebe
>> wrote:
>>> On 09 Nov 2012, at 16:06, ik wrote:
>>>
>>> And if I do it without the hash, then it's just a number
>>>
>>>
>>> UCS4Char is in fact just a n
On Fri, November 9, 2012 17:01, ik wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Jonas Maebe
> wrote:
>> On 09 Nov 2012, at 16:06, ik wrote:
>>
>> And if I do it without the hash, then it's just a number
>>
>>
>> UCS4Char is in fact just a number, and UCS4String is just a dynamic
>> array of
>> cardina
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 09 Nov 2012, at 16:06, ik wrote:
>
> And if I do it without the hash, then it's just a number
>
>
> UCS4Char is in fact just a number, and UCS4String is just a dynamic array of
> cardinal. UCS4 is not implemented as a complete string type i
On 11/08/2012 09:36 AM, bsquared wrote:
Hello,
I thought I would put this out to see what helpful information I could
gather.
I am in need of some JSON and HTTP functionality. I am thinking about
using some pieces from WST and I was looking for some input on this.
What I am doing is pulling d
On 09 Nov 2012, at 16:06, ik wrote:
And if I do it without the hash, then it's just a number
UCS4Char is in fact just a number, and UCS4String is just a dynamic
array of cardinal. UCS4 is not implemented as a complete string type
in FPC (or Delphi, for that matter).
Jonas__
Hello,
I'm trying to work with UCS4Char (for this:
https://github.com/ik5/fp-msgpack), but I can't figure out how to do
it.
For example, if do the following:
---
{$H+}
uses cwstring;
var
ch : UCS4Char;
begin
ch := #$233B4;
writeln(ch);
end.
-
On 2012-11-09 12:11, ik wrote:
>
> Qt5 afaik, does not support X11 anymore, only wayland, and that's the
> main path most Linux toolkits takes today.
As far as I know, they are simply moving more to XCB (the replacement
libary for XLib). Saying that, all (big five at least) Linux distros
already
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
> > I'm not sure why, because as far as I know, it replaces the X11
> > protocol, not gdk, Qt etc...
>
> That is how I understood it too.
>
> A while back I thought of starting the API bindings for fpGUI's Wayland
> backend. But I was told that the
On 09/11/12 11:06, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2012-11-09 10:42, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>> IOW, I wouldn't desperately try to support Wayland native at this point.
>>
>> That can be done if the native api turns out to be stable, Wayland truely
>> takes over X11, and all distros package it.
>>
On Friday 09 of November 2012 13:11:27 ik wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
>
> wrote:
> > On 2012-11-09 10:42, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> >> IOW, I wouldn't desperately try to support Wayland native at this point.
> >>
> >> That can be done if the native api turns out
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> On 2012-11-09 10:42, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>> IOW, I wouldn't desperately try to support Wayland native at this point.
>>
>> That can be done if the native api turns out to be stable, Wayland truely
>> takes over X11, and all distros p
On 2012-11-09 10:42, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> IOW, I wouldn't desperately try to support Wayland native at this point.
>
> That can be done if the native api turns out to be stable, Wayland truely
> takes over X11, and all distros package it.
>
> Now it is just asking for pain IMHO.
+1
That's
Am 09.11.2012 11:36, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
On 2012-11-09 09:51, ik wrote:
I'm not sure why, because as far as I know, it replaces the X11
protocol, not gdk, Qt etc...
That is how I understood it too.
A while back I thought of starting the API bindings for fpGUI's Wayland
backend. But I wa
Am 09.11.2012 10:51, schrieb ik:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
On 08.11.2012 22:35, ik wrote:
Hello,
It seems that many GUI toolkits are slowly starting to move to wayland
(http://wayland.freedesktop.org/), that moved to v1.0
Is there anyone who currently working on bindi
(Cross-posted to lazarus & fpc mailing lists)
I'm happy to announce a new binary version of Ludo Brands' and my fpcup
FPC+Lazarus+packages SVN downloader/installer.
New binaries for Windows, Windows x64, Linux x86, Linux x64 can be
downloaded from
https://bitbucket.org/reiniero/fpcup/downloads
S
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
>
> That is how I understood it too.
>
> A while back I thought of starting the API bindings for fpGUI's Wayland
> backend. But I was told that the Wayland API is still in flux. Unlike Qt
> or GTK, I don't have so much resources to spend on a movin
On 2012-11-09 09:51, ik wrote:
>
> I'm not sure why, because as far as I know, it replaces the X11
> protocol, not gdk, Qt etc...
That is how I understood it too.
A while back I thought of starting the API bindings for fpGUI's Wayland
backend. But I was told that the Wayland API is still in flux
Sorry, It was sent by mistake from my android device...
09.11.2012 7:19, waldo kitty пишет:
On 11/8/2012 22:15, Виктор Матузенко wrote:
Ккк
what? i don't understand how this is related to my query :? :(
--
Victor Matuzenko (Виктор Матузенко)
___
Ккк
09.11.2012 7:12 пользователь "waldo kitty"
написал:
> On 11/8/2012 17:11, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 8 Nov 2012, waldo kitty wrote:
>>
>>
>>> i'm looking at creating a REST web application client... nothing fancy...
>>> command line oriented... fire it up, it logs into the
I have converted b-tree filer to work on Free Pascal on Windows Xp
and Windows 7. Two of the function do not work, (reorg rekey). I
wrote three function that do the same thing, only two are needed I
have a demo (part of my program)
the editor and map driver and one text editor for the maps.
On 09 Nov 2012, at 02:30, Noah Silva wrote:
haha I see. It seemed very easy at the time, though. The binaries
were
just there, so I linked them. The reason for doing it that was was
just
that the installer/FAQ mentioned using the "Unix tools" option in the
installer, but the "installer"
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 08.11.2012 22:35, ik wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> It seems that many GUI toolkits are slowly starting to move to wayland
>> (http://wayland.freedesktop.org/), that moved to v1.0
>> Is there anyone who currently working on binding for it for FPC
30 matches
Mail list logo
